Raiders Team to kick off round 2

Inactive · Post by **Inactive** » February 13, 2005, 9:13 pm

I like guys who can put the fear of the almighty into opposing forwards ... I think that with a bit of controlled agression Crossy fits that bill.

tonio · Post by **tonio** » February 13, 2005, 9:16 pm

I actually think we got a pretty decent team for 05 and we will suprise a lot of people. People will underestimate our ability.

Nick · Post by **Nick** » February 14, 2005, 1:31 am

Bay knows where its at
without wiki and stats we need Crossy now, he is our only real genuine enforcer, someone who can rattle the big boys cages

BRING ON THE BOSS!

thickos · Post by **thickos** » February 14, 2005, 7:17 am

Raiders 2005 wrote:I actually think we got a pretty decent team for 05 and we will suprise a lot of people. People will underestimate our ability.

Yeah the team is 'pretty decent' but we're full of young guys who are a few more years off their potential. With the loss of the old heads, if we get in a rut we're really going to struggle IMO

edwahu · Post by **edwahu** » February 14, 2005, 8:59 am

I am more worried about our coaching staff then our playing staff.

freddo · Post by **freddo** » February 21, 2005, 8:28 pm

for our first game againts the knights we need our biggest hitting and strongest pack

so ohara cross weyman are a must along with hindmarsh hodgeson just need to hit the ball up at andrew johns each chance we get. and then run of gidley.

our slowest starting backline is faster than the knights fastest bacckline

Schifcofske
Graham
Mogg
Frawley
Chalk

VS

Hughes
Hall
Gidley
Carmont
Quinn

we **** on them for speed and defence i think its an easy 2 points for us