On the move? This is why your club is in danger of relocation
Moderator: GH Moderators
On the move? This is why your club is in danger of relocation
On the move? This is why your club is in danger of relocation
Canberra Raiders
The Raiders smashed their record membership numbers this year, and are going from strength to strength on the field. Like the Broncos, Knights, Cowboys and the Storm, the Raiders are key to the game’s lifeblood outside of Sydney.
Danger Rating: 2/5
Read more: https://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/on-the ... 912e6f2e78
Canberra Raiders
The Raiders smashed their record membership numbers this year, and are going from strength to strength on the field. Like the Broncos, Knights, Cowboys and the Storm, the Raiders are key to the game’s lifeblood outside of Sydney.
Danger Rating: 2/5
Read more: https://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/on-the ... 912e6f2e78
Re: On the move? This is why your club is in danger of relocation
Yeah, no. Next
Does show how far we've come in the stick era though. If we were in our 2013/14 hurt then this may be a valid discussion
Sent from my CPH1831 using Tapatalk
Does show how far we've come in the stick era though. If we were in our 2013/14 hurt then this may be a valid discussion
Sent from my CPH1831 using Tapatalk
Re: On the move? This is why your club is in danger of relocation
I was a bit surprised it was high as a 2.
-
- Mal Meninga
- Posts: 51221
- Joined: June 25, 2012, 9:53 am
- Favourite Player: Hodgo
- Location: Rockhampton, Central Queensland
Re: On the move? This is why your club is in danger of relocation
2 out of 5 is high?? Seems about right for me
I’m assuming there’s a bunch of Sydney clubs that are 4s and 5s?
I’m assuming there’s a bunch of Sydney clubs that are 4s and 5s?
Re: On the move? This is why your club is in danger of relocation
That’s what the link is for!The Rickman wrote: ↑September 3, 2019, 7:05 am 2 out of 5 is high?? Seems about right for me
I’m assuming there’s a bunch of Sydney clubs that are 4s and 5s?
-
- Mal Meninga
- Posts: 51221
- Joined: June 25, 2012, 9:53 am
- Favourite Player: Hodgo
- Location: Rockhampton, Central Queensland
Re: On the move? This is why your club is in danger of relocation
I don’t click on links that take me away from the forum
Greenhouse for life, baby!
Greenhouse for life, baby!
Re: On the move? This is why your club is in danger of relocation
Links just open a new tab. They don’t take you away from the site.
Re: On the move? This is why your club is in danger of relocation
Yeah I don’t think we’re at great risk... I’m sure we’re not super high on the list of saves either... we probably aren’t bringing much money into the game via tv deals etc, but we are stable off the field and unlikely to need a bail out from the NRL, and we serve in an area that it still a strategic foothold for playing talent for the code
And there are half a dozen bigger fish to fry before they worry about us
And there are half a dozen bigger fish to fry before they worry about us
-
- Mal Meninga
- Posts: 51221
- Joined: June 25, 2012, 9:53 am
- Favourite Player: Hodgo
- Location: Rockhampton, Central Queensland
Re: On the move? This is why your club is in danger of relocation
So... about 2 out of 5 sound about right to you too?PigRickman wrote:Yeah I don’t think we’re at great risk... I’m sure we’re not super high on the list of saves either... we probably aren’t bringing much money into the game via tv deals etc, but we are stable off the field and unlikely to need a bail out from the NRL, and we serve in an area that it still a strategic foothold for playing talent for the code
And there are half a dozen bigger fish to fry before they worry about us
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Re: On the move? This is why your club is in danger of relocation
Na, i have us at 1.76The Rickman wrote: ↑September 3, 2019, 8:24 amSo... about 2 out of 5 sound about right to you too?PigRickman wrote:Yeah I don’t think we’re at great risk... I’m sure we’re not super high on the list of saves either... we probably aren’t bringing much money into the game via tv deals etc, but we are stable off the field and unlikely to need a bail out from the NRL, and we serve in an area that it still a strategic foothold for playing talent for the code
And there are half a dozen bigger fish to fry before they worry about us
No idea why these **** clowns want to put us at 2.
-
- Mal Meninga
- Posts: 51221
- Joined: June 25, 2012, 9:53 am
- Favourite Player: Hodgo
- Location: Rockhampton, Central Queensland
Re: On the move? This is why your club is in danger of relocation
Hahaha indeed... "let's not listen to them"PigRickman wrote: ↑September 3, 2019, 8:50 amNa, i have us at 1.76The Rickman wrote: ↑September 3, 2019, 8:24 amSo... about 2 out of 5 sound about right to you too?PigRickman wrote:Yeah I don’t think we’re at great risk... I’m sure we’re not super high on the list of saves either... we probably aren’t bringing much money into the game via tv deals etc, but we are stable off the field and unlikely to need a bail out from the NRL, and we serve in an area that it still a strategic foothold for playing talent for the code
And there are half a dozen bigger fish to fry before they worry about us
No idea why these **** clowns want to put us at 2.
Re: On the move? This is why your club is in danger of relocation
Can't hide agendas in Rugby League.
How in world are the Raiders a 2/5, and not only that, the Newcastle Knights 2/5, the Cowboys 2/5 even with a new stadium getting built!
Even the New Zealand Warriors are a 2/5!
and yet the Bulldogs, a Sydney club, are 1/5 (safer)? Even the Eels are 1/5 ...
How in world are the Raiders a 2/5, and not only that, the Newcastle Knights 2/5, the Cowboys 2/5 even with a new stadium getting built!
Even the New Zealand Warriors are a 2/5!
and yet the Bulldogs, a Sydney club, are 1/5 (safer)? Even the Eels are 1/5 ...
Re: On the move? This is why your club is in danger of relocation
The Bulldogs and Eels are not going **** anywhere Beejay.
They are as safe as the Broncos, Storm, Roosters and Penrith... the population growth, the breeding grounds and money those markets bring into the game are vital for RL going forward
The Cowboys are safe as houses too, the code wants more QLD clubs, not less, the Titans are only in trouble because that market has proven a failure time and time again, i suspect the future of that franchise is to be the 2nd brisbane team.
The article has Cronulla, Manly and the Titooons as the most in danger, and to be perfectly honest, that's absolutely spot on.
They are as safe as the Broncos, Storm, Roosters and Penrith... the population growth, the breeding grounds and money those markets bring into the game are vital for RL going forward
The Cowboys are safe as houses too, the code wants more QLD clubs, not less, the Titans are only in trouble because that market has proven a failure time and time again, i suspect the future of that franchise is to be the 2nd brisbane team.
The article has Cronulla, Manly and the Titooons as the most in danger, and to be perfectly honest, that's absolutely spot on.
Re: On the move? This is why your club is in danger of relocation
Look they wouldn't be my first choice of Sydney clubs, but another Sydney club could just cover that area quite easily. Doesn't necessarily have to be the Bulldogs that cover an area, could be the Tigers.
Certainly not more safe than North Queensland Cowboys! Or the only team we have in the Country of New Zealand!
Anyway, not that important, but I just thought that was ridiculous.
Certainly not more safe than North Queensland Cowboys! Or the only team we have in the Country of New Zealand!
Anyway, not that important, but I just thought that was ridiculous.
-
- Laurie Daley
- Posts: 12657
- Joined: April 29, 2017, 7:22 pm
- Favourite Player: Ashley Gilbert
Re: On the move? This is why your club is in danger of relocation
I’d say there was a reasonable chance of the Brumbies being relocated and the Raiders membership increasing. The NRL would be smart to look at ways to support the Raiders to subtly encourage that to happen. Good home games in sensible time slots and a few promotional $$ for a start. Australian Rugby is on its knees - NRL should go harder than ever.
Re: On the move? This is why your club is in danger of relocation
I think one of the Titans greatest mistakes was to go with Blue as their primary colour. Helloooo? You're meant to be a QLD club, why are you Blue?
QLD need an additional team not one moving around, so I really wouldn't be moving the Titans. They need to get their **** together and stick it out.
This is my list of Clubs at risk of relocation;
1. Manly
2. Cronulla
3. Wests Tigers
4. Roosters
Daylight
5. Bulldogs
Copious amounts of Daylight
6. Eels
7. Dragons
8. Panthers
9. Rabbits
That's it. That's all the clubs at risk of relocation.
*some personal bias included against the Roosters. That boardroom is the envy of the rest of the NRL, but really for every other metric they are the top choice. If Politis carks it, they are in trouble.
QLD need an additional team not one moving around, so I really wouldn't be moving the Titans. They need to get their **** together and stick it out.
This is my list of Clubs at risk of relocation;
1. Manly
2. Cronulla
3. Wests Tigers
4. Roosters
Daylight
5. Bulldogs
Copious amounts of Daylight
6. Eels
7. Dragons
8. Panthers
9. Rabbits
That's it. That's all the clubs at risk of relocation.
*some personal bias included against the Roosters. That boardroom is the envy of the rest of the NRL, but really for every other metric they are the top choice. If Politis carks it, they are in trouble.
Re: On the move? This is why your club is in danger of relocation
haha fair, if it were up to me, i'd relocate the Broncos to Planet Hoth... @Billy Walker would love that im sure.
- GreenMachine
- Jason Croker
- Posts: 4271
- Joined: April 13, 2005, 2:22 pm
- Favourite Player: Laurie Daley
- GreenMachine
- Jason Croker
- Posts: 4271
- Joined: April 13, 2005, 2:22 pm
- Favourite Player: Laurie Daley
Re: On the move? This is why your club is in danger of relocation
Beejay wrote: ↑September 3, 2019, 9:26 am I think one of the Titans greatest mistakes was to go with Blue as their primary colour. Helloooo? You're meant to be a QLD club, why are you Blue?
QLD need an additional team not one moving around, so I really wouldn't be moving the Titans. They need to get their **** together and stick it out.
This is my list of Clubs at risk of relocation;
1. Manly
2. Cronulla
3. Wests Tigers
4. Roosters
Daylight
5. Bulldogs
Copious amounts of Daylight
6. Eels
7. Dragons
8. Panthers
9. Rabbits
That's it. That's all the clubs at risk of relocation.
*some personal bias included against the Roosters. That boardroom is the envy of the rest of the NRL, but really for every other metric they are the top choice. If Politis carks it, they are in trouble.
IMO Dragons are more of a chance than the Roosters - but neither will ever be moved.
Manly won't be moved.
Sharks and Tigers are easily the standouts in Sydney.
Titans outside of Sydney.
Re: On the move? This is why your club is in danger of relocation
The answer is exactly that, it's arbitrary.GreenMachine wrote: ↑September 3, 2019, 9:56 amme too...like how do they come up with such an arbitrary metric?
And the real answer is Manly, Cronulla and to a lesser extent the Tigers are the Sydney teams most at risk, and the Titoons are in a world of trouble. Everyone else is safe for the foreseeable future... but an article saying all by 4 clubs are safe as houses for now doesnt generate the clicks and stoke the fires of discussions on forums like this
Let's put it another way, by that article, the Raiders are as safe as the Roosters and Penrith.
-
- Mal Meninga
- Posts: 51221
- Joined: June 25, 2012, 9:53 am
- Favourite Player: Hodgo
- Location: Rockhampton, Central Queensland
Re: On the move? This is why your club is in danger of relocation
Tigers should be safe from relocation because they've had to merge once already, as have dragons, plus St George really do have such a wonderful history. Other Sydney teams should get the chop first, Manly and Sharks should be right in the discussion.
The Bulldogs do surprise me though, considering they changed their name to "Sydney" briefly in the 90s tells me that they're surely not that comfortable with their identity?
The Bulldogs do surprise me though, considering they changed their name to "Sydney" briefly in the 90s tells me that they're surely not that comfortable with their identity?
- GreenMachine
- Jason Croker
- Posts: 4271
- Joined: April 13, 2005, 2:22 pm
- Favourite Player: Laurie Daley
Re: On the move? This is why your club is in danger of relocation
Do you really think the NRL will move Manly?PigRickman wrote: ↑September 3, 2019, 10:03 amThe answer is exactly that, it's arbitrary.GreenMachine wrote: ↑September 3, 2019, 9:56 amme too...like how do they come up with such an arbitrary metric?
And the real answer is Manly, Cronulla and to a lesser extent the Tigers are the Sydney teams most at risk, and the Titoons are in a world of trouble. Everyone else is safe for the foreseeable future... but an article saying all by 4 clubs are safe as houses for now doesnt generate the clicks and stoke the fires of discussions on forums like this
Let's put it another way, by that article, the Raiders are as safe as the Roosters and Penrith.
I'm from Northern Sydney and AFL is played everywhere on weekends...it was never the case historically...normally Rugby.
I think they missed an opportunity with the Northern Eagles.
Agree Sharks and Tigers are the "hot takes".
The Bulldogs would be too, if it weren't for their lucrative leagues club.
Re: On the move? This is why your club is in danger of relocation
Who knows what they had in mind with the scores. But 2/5 implies to me, there is a 40 per cent chance of the Raiders being relocated. And there were a number of other clubs with that rating. I’d say it’s high for most if not all of those clubs. I’d say there’s next to no chance of regional clubs who are sound financially being relocated. The financial health of Newcastle is no longer an issue. The only “regional” club that is unsound financially is the Titans. The clubs in Sydney that are unsound financially are the the Tigers, Sharks and Sea Eagles, maybe the Dragons.
They’re the only clubs in any real danger of relocation.
They’re the only clubs in any real danger of relocation.
- GreenMachine
- Jason Croker
- Posts: 4271
- Joined: April 13, 2005, 2:22 pm
- Favourite Player: Laurie Daley
Re: On the move? This is why your club is in danger of relocation
100%.The Rickman wrote: ↑September 3, 2019, 10:05 am Tigers should be safe from relocation because they've had to merge once already, as have dragons, plus St George really do have such a wonderful history. Other Sydney teams should get the chop first, Manly and Sharks should be right in the discussion.
The Bulldogs do surprise me though, considering they changed their name to "Sydney" briefly in the 90s tells me that they're surely not that comfortable with their identity?
The Bulldogs seem to escape the debate purely because of the financial backing of their leagues club. They are an obvious choice IMO.
-
- Mal Meninga
- Posts: 51221
- Joined: June 25, 2012, 9:53 am
- Favourite Player: Hodgo
- Location: Rockhampton, Central Queensland
Re: On the move? This is why your club is in danger of relocation
The Tigers aren't unsound financially, Wests is a very rich club and I'm pretty sure they control the license now, don't they?
Re: On the move? This is why your club is in danger of relocation
Dragons cover Wollongong and the South Coast. Already merged with The Steelers who have the historical name in the area. All of the juniors for the last 30 years have been under the Steelers and now the Dragons. It's legitimately a great Junior area owned by the Dragons.
I think that's a pretty strong case.
I think that's a pretty strong case.
Re: On the move? This is why your club is in danger of relocation
Souths are the obvious candidate, they don't play home games in their traditional area and are probably the most nationally generic team in the comp.
Edrick The Entertainer
-
- Mal Meninga
- Posts: 51221
- Joined: June 25, 2012, 9:53 am
- Favourite Player: Hodgo
- Location: Rockhampton, Central Queensland
Re: On the move? This is why your club is in danger of relocation
Dragons are perfectly safe, it's actually the Sharks that don't make sense in this puzzle.
-
- Mal Meninga
- Posts: 51221
- Joined: June 25, 2012, 9:53 am
- Favourite Player: Hodgo
- Location: Rockhampton, Central Queensland
Re: On the move? This is why your club is in danger of relocation
They can't get rid of Souths, too much history, too many supporters, and we all remember what happened last time!
-
- Brett Mullins
- Posts: 1473
- Joined: July 11, 2015, 5:57 pm
- Favourite Player: Laurie Daley
- Location: Canberra
Re: On the move? This is why your club is in danger of relocation
I’m with Gould and his comments last night. The NRL don’t have the bottle to move anybody, unlike the AFL.
Re: On the move? This is why your club is in danger of relocation
Designing the League around where the best Poker machine revenue is, is what got us into this mess.GreenMachine wrote: ↑September 3, 2019, 10:10 am100%.The Rickman wrote: ↑September 3, 2019, 10:05 am Tigers should be safe from relocation because they've had to merge once already, as have dragons, plus St George really do have such a wonderful history. Other Sydney teams should get the chop first, Manly and Sharks should be right in the discussion.
The Bulldogs do surprise me though, considering they changed their name to "Sydney" briefly in the 90s tells me that they're surely not that comfortable with their identity?
The Bulldogs seem to escape the debate purely because of the financial backing of their leagues club. They are an obvious choice IMO.
Side note* absolutely sensational long-form podcast about the Super league War by "The Rugby League Digest". Currently running now. Must listen for any Rugby League tragic.
- Matt
- Don Furner
- Posts: 38872
- Joined: May 18, 2010, 4:17 pm
- Favourite Player: Time for the new breed Savage, Mooney, Timoko
- Location: Canberra
Re: On the move? This is why your club is in danger of relocation
Bronx 0The Rickman wrote: ↑September 3, 2019, 7:05 am 2 out of 5 is high?? Seems about right for me
I’m assuming there’s a bunch of Sydney clubs that are 4s and 5s?
Dogs 1
Sharks 5
Titans 5
Manly 4
Storm 0
Knights 2
Cows 2
Eels 1
Panthers 2
Bunnies 1
Dragons 2
Chooks 2
Warriors 2
Tigers 3
Some really poor reasoning and risk ratings here.
- Northern Raider
- Mal Meninga
- Posts: 32584
- Joined: June 19, 2007, 8:17 am
- Favourite Player: Dean Lance
- Location: Greener pastures
Re: On the move? This is why your club is in danger of relocation
I've come up with a comprehensive list of clubs at risk of relocation. I've ranked them in order:
1. Sharks
1. Sharks
* The author assumes no responsibility for the topicality, correctness, completeness or quality of information provided.
- Matt
- Don Furner
- Posts: 38872
- Joined: May 18, 2010, 4:17 pm
- Favourite Player: Time for the new breed Savage, Mooney, Timoko
- Location: Canberra
Re: On the move? This is why your club is in danger of relocation
Its between the Sharks and the Titans, surely.Northern Raider wrote: ↑September 3, 2019, 10:25 am I've come up with a comprehensive list of clubs at risk of relocation. I've ranked them in order:
1. Sharks
Manly probably should go, but the NRL cant afford to give up the area to union.
-
- Mal Meninga
- Posts: 51221
- Joined: June 25, 2012, 9:53 am
- Favourite Player: Hodgo
- Location: Rockhampton, Central Queensland
Re: On the move? This is why your club is in danger of relocation
Manly, Sharks and Titans are my three most obvious. Shame for the Titans to go, but the Gold Coast has never been a success.
Titans and Suns are both sitting the bottom of their respective league, it's hard to see either of those entities still existing in five years' time.
Titans and Suns are both sitting the bottom of their respective league, it's hard to see either of those entities still existing in five years' time.