The Cricket Thread

From cricket to motor sports to wrestling and anything in between

Moderator: GH Moderators

User avatar
bonehead
Laurie Daley
Posts: 17463
Joined: March 1, 2005, 5:29 am
Location: Smelling The Shiraz

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by bonehead »

see they are posing that the overthrow was 5 not 6
Edrick The Entertainer
User avatar
Azza
Laurie Daley
Posts: 10606
Joined: February 16, 2005, 10:12 am

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by Azza »

Well the result was stupid. IMO shared winners would have been fine.
The Nickman
Mal Meninga
Posts: 51218
Joined: June 25, 2012, 9:53 am
Favourite Player: Hodgo
Location: Rockhampton, Central Queensland

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by The Nickman »

Azza wrote:Well the result was stupid. IMO shared winners would have been fine.
Well in my opinion the JEDI are evil!
User avatar
kiwi raider
Steve Walters
Posts: 7683
Joined: March 31, 2008, 7:59 pm
Location: Christchurch, NZ

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by kiwi raider »

Rick wrote: July 15, 2019, 5:14 pm This result still does not sit comfortably with me.

I agree they either need to keep going until there is a result or to just call it a draw.

Count back for boundaries is the stupidest thing I have heard.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I don't think you can really have a shared world cup but going on total boundaries is a ridiculous rule, you may as well award It to the team who had the most
roots....
User avatar
Azza
Laurie Daley
Posts: 10606
Joined: February 16, 2005, 10:12 am

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by Azza »

Yeah the game is already way too much in the favour of batsmen. Why not make it most wickets taken? Or replay the match? Something. It's a crap way to decide a game.
The Nickman
Mal Meninga
Posts: 51218
Joined: June 25, 2012, 9:53 am
Favourite Player: Hodgo
Location: Rockhampton, Central Queensland

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by The Nickman »

Or just do another super over
User avatar
kiwi raider
Steve Walters
Posts: 7683
Joined: March 31, 2008, 7:59 pm
Location: Christchurch, NZ

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by kiwi raider »

The Rickman wrote: July 15, 2019, 8:16 pm Or just do another super over
Yea it's not like they are going to go through 10 tied super overs, you'll get a winner in the first 2 or 3 max.
And while we are changing rules can we get rid of any runs from deflections off the batsmen counting? I mean even batsmen regularly refuse to take the runs when the ball doesn't make it to the boundary so why the hell do they allow the runs when the ball does make it there? Just call dead ball as soon as it hits the batsmen,
I actually think if that deflection doesn't hit stokes bat hes run out, the ball was hitting direct imo.
User avatar
-TW-
Mal Meninga
Posts: 35436
Joined: July 2, 2007, 11:41 am

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by -TW- »

Meanwhile Tim Paine out for a duck in the tour game vs England Lions

Sent from my CPH1831 using Tapatalk

User avatar
Azza
Laurie Daley
Posts: 10606
Joined: February 16, 2005, 10:12 am

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by Azza »

The Paine issue is going to come to a head soon I would have thought. He did a good job over the summer leading the side but didn't contribute much with the bat, and with Carey doing so well and Wade also in great form can the side really afford to carry him just for his captaincy and keeping? There is of course the question of who would pick up the role if he wasn't in the side. Not an easy one for the selectors.
User avatar
kiwi raider
Steve Walters
Posts: 7683
Joined: March 31, 2008, 7:59 pm
Location: Christchurch, NZ

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by kiwi raider »

Has Matthew wade suddenly turned in to a half decent cricketer? Or do people.just want to hear the "nice one gary" again?
Seriously? Because I remember him being pretty rubbish at international level?
I'd be picking Carey, looks to have a far better technique and array of shots than Wade and Paine combined, may not come off but better than going with proven average cricketers
raiderskater
Jason Croker
Posts: 4923
Joined: July 26, 2015, 8:24 pm
Favourite Player: Croker, Cotric, Sezer
Location: The Land of Lime Green

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by raiderskater »

I'm absolutely filthy with England "winning" and it makes the sport look like a joke.

Both teams scored the same amount of runs, but New Zealand took more wickets. In absolutely no way, shape or form did England outplay New Zealand, but somehow England go home with the trophy. Absolute bulldust.
And to all the people who doubted me, hello to them as well. - Mark Webber, Raiders Ballboy and Unluckiest F1 Driver Ever

I'm attacking in the right way, instead of just...attacking in the general direction. - Max Aaron (also eerily apropos for the Green Machine)
User avatar
Azza
Laurie Daley
Posts: 10606
Joined: February 16, 2005, 10:12 am

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by Azza »

kiwi raider wrote: July 15, 2019, 9:13 pm Has Matthew wade suddenly turned in to a half decent cricketer? Or do people.just want to hear the "nice one gary" again?
Seriously? Because I remember him being pretty rubbish at international level?
I'd be picking Carey, looks to have a far better technique and array of shots than Wade and Paine combined, may not come off but better than going with proven average cricketers
hard to argue with wade's form for the last couple of years - but i'd pick carey too
User avatar
-TW-
Mal Meninga
Posts: 35436
Joined: July 2, 2007, 11:41 am

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by -TW- »

He's always been a good bat, he's just rubbish with the gloves

I'd pick him as a bat alone

Sent from my CPH1831 using Tapatalk

User avatar
Azza
Laurie Daley
Posts: 10606
Joined: February 16, 2005, 10:12 am

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by Azza »

I actually think his batting wasn't that great in pure number terms until the last couple of years, where he's suddenly scored a pretty decent number of runs.
User avatar
greeneyed
Don Furner
Posts: 145356
Joined: January 7, 2005, 4:21 pm

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by greeneyed »

If people are upset... Let's face it.. a "World Cup" of one day cricket is hardly that serious. One day cricket is not serious.
Image
User avatar
kiwi raider
Steve Walters
Posts: 7683
Joined: March 31, 2008, 7:59 pm
Location: Christchurch, NZ

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by kiwi raider »

greeneyed wrote: July 15, 2019, 11:45 pm If people are upset... Let's face it.. a "World Cup" of one day cricket is hardly that serious. One day cricket is not serious.
far more "serious" than a rugby league world cup....its the pinnacle of the sport, not every country in the world plays in the ashes incase you hadn't realised....
User avatar
-PJ-
Mal Meninga
Posts: 24837
Joined: May 8, 2010, 1:58 pm
Favourite Player: Josh Papalii
Location: 416.9 km from GIO Stadium

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by -PJ- »

greeneyed wrote: July 15, 2019, 11:45 pm If people are upset... Let's face it.. a "World Cup" of one day cricket is hardly that serious. One day cricket is not serious.
Those of us in the cricket thread are generally cricket fans...

It's serious..

Did you know Breakdancing is being introduced into the Olympics ?
3rd Battalion Royal Australian Regiment..Old Faithful
#emptythetank :shock:
User avatar
Azza
Laurie Daley
Posts: 10606
Joined: February 16, 2005, 10:12 am

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by Azza »

I'm sure Steven would be massively excited about tap dancing in the Olympics but it's not serious...
User avatar
greeneyed
Don Furner
Posts: 145356
Joined: January 7, 2005, 4:21 pm

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by greeneyed »

-PJ- wrote: July 16, 2019, 6:58 am
greeneyed wrote: July 15, 2019, 11:45 pm If people are upset... Let's face it.. a "World Cup" of one day cricket is hardly that serious. One day cricket is not serious.
Those of us in the cricket thread are generally cricket fans...

It's serious..

Did you know Breakdancing is being introduced into the Olympics ?
You can’t be serious.
Image
The Nickman
Mal Meninga
Posts: 51218
Joined: June 25, 2012, 9:53 am
Favourite Player: Hodgo
Location: Rockhampton, Central Queensland

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by The Nickman »

greeneyed wrote:If people are upset... Let's face it.. a "World Cup" of one day cricket is hardly that serious. One day cricket is not serious.
Hahaha there’s nothing better than when Ferg is on his third bottle of red and just starts trolling the other sports’ threads
User avatar
-PJ-
Mal Meninga
Posts: 24837
Joined: May 8, 2010, 1:58 pm
Favourite Player: Josh Papalii
Location: 416.9 km from GIO Stadium

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by -PJ- »

greeneyed wrote: July 16, 2019, 8:00 am
-PJ- wrote: July 16, 2019, 6:58 am
greeneyed wrote: July 15, 2019, 11:45 pm If people are upset... Let's face it.. a "World Cup" of one day cricket is hardly that serious. One day cricket is not serious.
Those of us in the cricket thread are generally cricket fans...

It's serious..

Did you know Breakdancing is being introduced into the Olympics ?
You can’t be serious.
Yes I am serious..seriously serious !!
3rd Battalion Royal Australian Regiment..Old Faithful
#emptythetank :shock:
User avatar
-TW-
Mal Meninga
Posts: 35436
Joined: July 2, 2007, 11:41 am

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by -TW- »

greeneyed wrote:If people are upset... Let's face it.. a "World Cup" of one day cricket is hardly that serious. One day cricket is not serious.
Better than the rugby league 6 nations

Beat it

Sent from my CPH1831 using Tapatalk

User avatar
greeneyed
Don Furner
Posts: 145356
Joined: January 7, 2005, 4:21 pm

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by greeneyed »

-PJ- wrote: July 16, 2019, 8:21 am
greeneyed wrote: July 16, 2019, 8:00 am
-PJ- wrote: July 16, 2019, 6:58 am
greeneyed wrote: July 15, 2019, 11:45 pm If people are upset... Let's face it.. a "World Cup" of one day cricket is hardly that serious. One day cricket is not serious.
Those of us in the cricket thread are generally cricket fans...

It's serious..

Did you know Breakdancing is being introduced into the Olympics ?
You can’t be serious.
Yes I am serious..seriously serious !!
Surely you can’t be serious!?
Image
User avatar
Matt
Don Furner
Posts: 38872
Joined: May 18, 2010, 4:17 pm
Favourite Player: Time for the new breed Savage, Mooney, Timoko
Location: Canberra

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by Matt »

Boundaries deciding the WC is a farce. Wickets would be a far better decider. However... after a super over we still have a tie. So, I could totally see reason for a replay. Not sure it could get closer to really require one.

As for the keeper dilemma. I think they will pick Paine, which is crazy. I would probably pick Carey, as i believe he is a better gloveman than Wade, and looks to be the future. Wade couldnt have done any more than he has to get a run somewhere, T20, ODI or Test, and they still havent picked him. His form is so ridiculously good at the moment.

I think my side would be:
1. Warner
2. Harris vs Burns - coin toss IMO. Harris earnt his spot vs India, but Burns piled on runs vs Sri Lanka. Bancroft 3rd IMO.
3. Khawaja
4. Smith
5. Head
6. Patterson
7. Carey - as above Wade unlucky
8. Cummins
9. Starc
10. Lyon (yes batting promotion)
11. Hazelwood
12th Id hope Pattinson was fit enough.
13th Laubuchange is probably my backup bat and allrounder.
User avatar
-PJ-
Mal Meninga
Posts: 24837
Joined: May 8, 2010, 1:58 pm
Favourite Player: Josh Papalii
Location: 416.9 km from GIO Stadium

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by -PJ- »

Telling the Test captain he's dropped would be a difficult conversation I'd reckon.

Considering since the ball tampering TPaine has been more popular than the good lord within cricket circles...
3rd Battalion Royal Australian Regiment..Old Faithful
#emptythetank :shock:
User avatar
Matt
Don Furner
Posts: 38872
Joined: May 18, 2010, 4:17 pm
Favourite Player: Time for the new breed Savage, Mooney, Timoko
Location: Canberra

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by Matt »

-PJ- wrote: July 16, 2019, 9:28 am Telling the Test captain he's dropped would be a difficult conversation I'd reckon.

Considering since the ball tampering TPaine has been more popular than the good lord within cricket circles...
You are correct. However, he got the gloves and captaincy via the Stephen Bradbury method. I realize the captaincy is still an issue in the side I selected, but a guy like Head would be an ok option, seeing as though they dont want to give it to a bowler.
User avatar
bonehead
Laurie Daley
Posts: 17463
Joined: March 1, 2005, 5:29 am
Location: Smelling The Shiraz

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by bonehead »

I'd think Paine will hold onto the C until Smith can take over again. I don't see anyone else in that side capable as caretaker outside Lyon.
Let Carey know he's in the plans.
Edrick The Entertainer
User avatar
Northern Raider
Mal Meninga
Posts: 32584
Joined: June 19, 2007, 8:17 am
Favourite Player: Dean Lance
Location: Greener pastures

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by Northern Raider »

Matt wrote: July 16, 2019, 9:20 am
2. Harris vs Burns - coin toss IMO. Harris earnt his spot vs India, but Burns piled on runs vs Sri Lanka. Bancroft 3rd IMO.
He's passed 50 twice in 11 test innings. Thats hardly earning your spot as an opener. Burns is ahead of him on every measure.
* The author assumes no responsibility for the topicality, correctness, completeness or quality of information provided.
User avatar
Northern Raider
Mal Meninga
Posts: 32584
Joined: June 19, 2007, 8:17 am
Favourite Player: Dean Lance
Location: Greener pastures

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by Northern Raider »

bonehead wrote: July 16, 2019, 3:46 pm I'd think Paine will hold onto the C until Smith can take over again. I don't see anyone else in that side capable as caretaker outside Lyon.
Let Carey know he's in the plans.
Winx like odds of that occurring. Paine is a placeholder. Smith will be reinstated for the next home summer.
* The author assumes no responsibility for the topicality, correctness, completeness or quality of information provided.
User avatar
MrPosh
Clinton Schifcofske
Posts: 572
Joined: June 24, 2016, 5:39 am
Favourite Player: Whitehead

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by MrPosh »

Right. I think I've calmed down enough to pop onto here for a moment.

For what it's worth, I think New Zealand should have won, but I don't really care.
User avatar
Matt
Don Furner
Posts: 38872
Joined: May 18, 2010, 4:17 pm
Favourite Player: Time for the new breed Savage, Mooney, Timoko
Location: Canberra

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by Matt »

MrPosh wrote: July 16, 2019, 5:00 pm Right. I think I've calmed down enough to pop onto here for a moment.

For what it's worth, I think New Zealand should have won, but I don't really care.
The reverse whinging Pom, love it
User avatar
gangrenous
Laurie Daley
Posts: 16706
Joined: May 12, 2007, 10:42 pm

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by gangrenous »

I love that the Poms have to go nuts celebrating a Bradbury Cup since they can’t win one legitimately
User avatar
bonehead
Laurie Daley
Posts: 17463
Joined: March 1, 2005, 5:29 am
Location: Smelling The Shiraz

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by bonehead »

it will always have an asterisk next to it.
Edrick The Entertainer
User avatar
-PJ-
Mal Meninga
Posts: 24837
Joined: May 8, 2010, 1:58 pm
Favourite Player: Josh Papalii
Location: 416.9 km from GIO Stadium

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by -PJ- »

Realistically the 2019 CWC wasn't won by anyone..

So it should stay with the previous champions for another 4yrs.

AUS..the 2019 CWC champions !!
3rd Battalion Royal Australian Regiment..Old Faithful
#emptythetank :shock:
User avatar
Matt
Don Furner
Posts: 38872
Joined: May 18, 2010, 4:17 pm
Favourite Player: Time for the new breed Savage, Mooney, Timoko
Location: Canberra

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by Matt »

-PJ- wrote: July 17, 2019, 8:31 am Realistically the 2019 CWC wasn't won by anyone..

So it should stay with the previous champions for another 4yrs.

AUS..the 2019 CWC champions !!
:cmon
Post Reply