Joe Tapine found guilty, banned two weeks by judiciary
Moderator: GH Moderators
Re: Joe Tapine found guilty, banned two weeks by judiciary
Boooo. Judiciary probably didn't even know the whole story.
Re: Joe Tapine found guilty, banned two weeks by judiciary
Not surprised.
- -PJ-
- Mal Meninga
- Posts: 24837
- Joined: May 8, 2010, 1:58 pm
- Favourite Player: Josh Papalii
- Location: 416.9 km from GIO Stadium
Re: Joe Tapine found guilty, banned two weeks by judiciary
Well that's not good..
I don't want Joe to lose the aggression at all.
I don't want Joe to lose the aggression at all.
3rd Battalion Royal Australian Regiment..Old Faithful
#emptythetank
#emptythetank
Re: Joe Tapine found guilty, banned two weeks by judiciary
Not even a little bit. As i said, in a post Alex McKinnon world, you're just not going to get a verdict on a tackle like this.
Re: Joe Tapine found guilty, banned two weeks by judiciary
Canberra Raiders without Joe Tapine for two weeks
The Canberra Raiders will be without New Zealand international Joe Tapine for two weeks after the NRL judiciary found him guilty of dangerous contact on Tuesday night.
"I wouldn't trade him for anyone, his aggression's what makes him such a good player," Jarrod Croker said. "He's obviously a very skilful player, but quite an aggressive player and he's been really good for us over the past couple of years so I don't want to take that away from him.
Read more: https://www.canberratimes.com.au/sport/ ... 4zqmu.html
The Canberra Raiders will be without New Zealand international Joe Tapine for two weeks after the NRL judiciary found him guilty of dangerous contact on Tuesday night.
"I wouldn't trade him for anyone, his aggression's what makes him such a good player," Jarrod Croker said. "He's obviously a very skilful player, but quite an aggressive player and he's been really good for us over the past couple of years so I don't want to take that away from him.
Read more: https://www.canberratimes.com.au/sport/ ... 4zqmu.html
Re: Joe Tapine found guilty, banned two weeks by judiciary
I don't think it even deserved a penalty. Sure he lifted his legs but the bloke had his forearms on the ground. Doesn't a dangerous tackle have to actually be dangerous?
Shoving it in your face since 2017
- Seiffert82
- Mal Meninga
- Posts: 28135
- Joined: March 17, 2007, 12:24 pm
- Favourite Player: Bay56
- gangrenous
- Laurie Daley
- Posts: 16706
- Joined: May 12, 2007, 10:42 pm
Re: Joe Tapine found guilty, banned two weeks by judiciary
Archer wrote:Boooo. Judiciary probably didn't even know the whole story.
Re: Joe Tapine found guilty, banned two weeks by judiciary
I’m OK on this charge if it’s consistently applied by the review committee.
All three of Tapine’s suspensions this year have seen identical incidents for other players go unpunished.
All three of Tapine’s suspensions this year have seen identical incidents for other players go unpunished.
Re: Joe Tapine found guilty, banned two weeks by judiciary
Tapine is becoming a consistent repeat offender. I don't have a problem with him going after the legs of an opposition player, it is the lift which gets them into a possible dangerous position that he needs to remove from his game.