Wighton not guilty
Moderator: GH Moderators
-
- Sam Backo
- Posts: 179
- Joined: June 28, 2007, 9:00 pm
- Favourite Player: Bronson Harrison
Toots Croker 2nd - Location: Brisbane
Re: Wighton facing a four game suspension
Justin hodges anyone? Or maybe ryan james must fight this at worst i see us getting a downgrade where jack might miss a week. Joke!
1 August 2009 - 56 reasons to be a Raiders fan - 0 to be a Bronco.
-
- Brett Mullins
- Posts: 1511
- Joined: March 10, 2009, 5:07 pm
- Favourite Player: Josh Hodgson
- Location: Bay 52, Canberra Stadium
Re: Wighton facing a four game suspension
And there's the defence case. By their own rules, the arm not being tucked in is sufficient for Wighton to get off.Northern Raider wrote:THis pic from the Raiders website clearly shows its not a shoulder charge. What was Beuttner saying about his arm being down by his side?
Canberra Raiders
Member No. 1130
Breeding Raiders members since 2010
Member No. 1130
Breeding Raiders members since 2010
Re: Wighton facing a four game suspension
What's his right arm doing?AJL wrote:And there's the defence case. By their own rules, the arm not being tucked in is sufficient for Wighton to get off.Northern Raider wrote:THis pic from the Raiders website clearly shows its not a shoulder charge. What was Beuttner saying about his arm being down by his side?
2013 'Nella Awards - MVP
2013 'Nella Awards - Spite Day Winner
2013 'Nella Awards - Worst System (The Club)
- Regs Revolution
- John Ferguson
- Posts: 2474
- Joined: April 26, 2010, 11:50 pm
- Favourite Player: Ruben Wiki
- Location: Sydney
Re: Wighton facing a four game suspension
WHAT THE ****!!!!!
I cannot believe this.
If I was stick, fight the charge the whole way.
The NRL is a **** JOKE!
I cannot believe this.
If I was stick, fight the charge the whole way.
The NRL is a **** JOKE!
- Raider Bell
- Gary Belcher
- Posts: 6208
- Joined: May 6, 2012, 4:11 pm
- Favourite Player: Billyt
Re: The judiciary is ****
That we always seem to be on the receiving end of.Pigman wrote:Absolutely I dobleedgreen99 wrote:Do you still believe there is no bias against us?Pigman wrote:UBET i did. **** hellRaider Azz wrote:I think you gave the NRL way too much credit in this casePigman wrote:He'll be fine
If he's charged the papers will be filled with stories of inconsistency at the MRC committee and that'll be the talk of the week. They wont be signing up for that **** show. They've gone too far down to road to walk it back now. He'll be cleared to play. Im sure of it!
As stated, the MRC has been a walking punch line of inconsistency since inception.
Do you think it's at all possible the Greenberg or someone in the NRL administration could be corrupt? Or do you think it's completely impossible.
"A hex on your house, and more importantly your health"
"I truly hope the spirit of my mate gives you hell, you deserve it"
"I truly hope the spirit of my mate gives you hell, you deserve it"
- Ultima
- Laurie Daley
- Posts: 12466
- Joined: January 18, 2005, 9:46 pm
- Favourite Player: Croker
- Location: Brisbane, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Wighton facing a four game suspension
Also this is the guy who said "element of football" and let Hayne off for touching a ref as it was an "accident" which somehow doesn't come into consideration for ANY other charges...
Re: Wighton facing a four game suspension
Our best chance is to push for a downgrade to 1 week. The other BS charge he copped against the cowboys doesnt help.
- Northern Raider
- Mal Meninga
- Posts: 32624
- Joined: June 19, 2007, 8:17 am
- Favourite Player: Dean Lance
- Location: Greener pastures
Re: Wighton facing a four game suspension
Check the video. It was up as well.Shezza wrote:What's his right arm doing?AJL wrote:And there's the defence case. By their own rules, the arm not being tucked in is sufficient for Wighton to get off.Northern Raider wrote:THis pic from the Raiders website clearly shows its not a shoulder charge. What was Beuttner saying about his arm being down by his side?
* The author assumes no responsibility for the topicality, correctness, completeness or quality of information provided.
Re: The judiciary is ****
Anything is possible.
I'd say the likelihood that Greenberg or someone in the NRL being corrupted specifically to disadvantage the Canberra Raiders would be the closest decimal point to impossible without saying it's impossible.
I'd say the likelihood that Greenberg or someone in the NRL being corrupted specifically to disadvantage the Canberra Raiders would be the closest decimal point to impossible without saying it's impossible.
Re: Wighton facing a four game suspension
Surely if we rock up showing both arms up it's not a shoulder charge and he walks. Surely???Northern Raider wrote:Check the video. It was up as well.Shezza wrote:What's his right arm doing?AJL wrote:And there's the defence case. By their own rules, the arm not being tucked in is sufficient for Wighton to get off.Northern Raider wrote:THis pic from the Raiders website clearly shows its not a shoulder charge. What was Beuttner saying about his arm being down by his side?
Dreaming. They'll prob grant Jack Bird his wish and move us to Sydney as punishment for complaining.
2013 'Nella Awards - MVP
2013 'Nella Awards - Spite Day Winner
2013 'Nella Awards - Worst System (The Club)
- Northern Raider
- Mal Meninga
- Posts: 32624
- Joined: June 19, 2007, 8:17 am
- Favourite Player: Dean Lance
- Location: Greener pastures
Re: Wighton facing a four game suspension
Beuttner being pedantic with definitions to let off Ennis and charging Jack. I'm wondering where his "element of football" explanation is that applied to this one.
* The author assumes no responsibility for the topicality, correctness, completeness or quality of information provided.
- Raider Azz
- Jason Croker
- Posts: 4476
- Joined: January 7, 2005, 10:22 pm
Re: The judiciary is ****
I think there is one thing we can at least all agree on - **** the match review committee
Re: Wighton facing a four game suspension
We'll obviously be fighting it. No question. The club will be putting together our defence and getting counsel in place as we speak.
But it upsets our prep, and is a complete farce.
Not that it was smart play from Jack, but I believe pretty much 95% of the rugby league community believe he should be able to play next week. It's just unfortunate that the 5% happen to include the clowns on the match review panel.
But it upsets our prep, and is a complete farce.
Not that it was smart play from Jack, but I believe pretty much 95% of the rugby league community believe he should be able to play next week. It's just unfortunate that the 5% happen to include the clowns on the match review panel.
- Northern Raider
- Mal Meninga
- Posts: 32624
- Joined: June 19, 2007, 8:17 am
- Favourite Player: Dean Lance
- Location: Greener pastures
Re: Wighton facing a four game suspension
It really is that simple. The definition of the charge is not consistent with the images. Unfortunately we shouldn't hold our breath for logic to play a part in judiciary hearings.Shezza wrote:Surely if we rock up showing both arms up it's not a shoulder charge and he walks. Surely???
Dreaming. They'll prob grant Jack Bird his wish and move us to Sydney as punishment for complaining.
* The author assumes no responsibility for the topicality, correctness, completeness or quality of information provided.
- Raider Bell
- Gary Belcher
- Posts: 6208
- Joined: May 6, 2012, 4:11 pm
- Favourite Player: Billyt
Re: The judiciary is ****
In reality, yes. I don't think they're angled against the Raiders, I think they're angled towards a select few teams, at the very real detriment of others.Pigman wrote:Anything is possible.
I'd say the likelihood that Greenberg or someone in the NRL being corrupted specifically to disadvantage the Canberra Raiders would be the closest decimal point to impossible without saying it's impossible.
There's only so many times you can put these blunders down to incompetence.
"A hex on your house, and more importantly your health"
"I truly hope the spirit of my mate gives you hell, you deserve it"
"I truly hope the spirit of my mate gives you hell, you deserve it"
Re: Wighton facing a four game suspension
Between this and blokes wearing FKL on their arm bands, the NRL is a deadset disgrace of an organisation, now watch for the Titans to be barrowed through the finals as well, like the did with storm many moons ago, Fifa > NRL.
This place is woke.
Re: Wighton facing a four game suspension
I got a screen shot showing the right arm but can't work out how to upload it.Northern Raider wrote:It really is that simple. The definition of the charge is not consistent with the images. Unfortunately we shouldn't hold our breath for logic to play a part in judiciary hearings.Shezza wrote:Surely if we rock up showing both arms up it's not a shoulder charge and he walks. Surely???
Dreaming. They'll prob grant Jack Bird his wish and move us to Sydney as punishment for complaining.
dontknowwhatimdoingdog.jpg
2013 'Nella Awards - MVP
2013 'Nella Awards - Spite Day Winner
2013 'Nella Awards - Worst System (The Club)
- yeh raiders
- Laurie Daley
- Posts: 17147
- Joined: June 21, 2008, 3:04 pm
- Favourite Player: Jack Wighton
- Location: Sydney
Re: Wighton facing a four game suspension
My dissatisfaction with the NRL has hit an all time high.Northern Raider wrote:Beuttner being pedantic with definitions to let off Ennis and charging Jack. I'm wondering where his "element of football" explanation is that applied to this one.
What a **** disgrace of an organisation. I continually refer back to the Koribete incident, when discussing the farce that is, the NRL match review committee.
They wonder why people are turning off. What a **** joke.
We need to fight this with everything we have because (a) Wighton's arm is clearly open to making the tackle (b) Koribete (c) we need Jack (d) **** the MRC
Re: Wighton facing a four game suspension
The left arm in the Wighton tackle is completely irrelevant guys because he shoulder charged him with the right shoulder ****. On that tackle alone I have no dramas with him being charged.
But **** me put it up against the Ennis charge (which was way worse he's just not as strong) and it is a **** gee up.
But **** me put it up against the Ennis charge (which was way worse he's just not as strong) and it is a **** gee up.
well, I guess you could say that I'm buy curious.
Re: Wighton facing a four game suspension
I actually wonder if there is more human xxxxx administering it as opposed to playing it.
This place is woke.
- Raidersfan
- Ruben Wiki
- Posts: 5365
- Joined: March 16, 2013, 4:39 pm
- Favourite Player: George Clooney
Re: Wighton facing a four game suspension
MRC are absolute **** ... this is clear from the video on Fox (use the slide bar to slow down play)
.. Wighton's leading arm is NOT tucked in ... therefore one of the parameters is **** already.
.. Wighton's left arm is pointing upwards and is on the ball / chest of Edwards indicating that he as attempting to wrap his arms ... another of the parameters ****
Fight it all the way Raiders ... lets make an example of this biased organisation !!
.. Wighton's leading arm is NOT tucked in ... therefore one of the parameters is **** already.
.. Wighton's left arm is pointing upwards and is on the ball / chest of Edwards indicating that he as attempting to wrap his arms ... another of the parameters ****
Fight it all the way Raiders ... lets make an example of this biased organisation !!
Last edited by Raidersfan on September 5, 2016, 2:12 pm, edited 3 times in total.
I don't post facts
Re: Wighton facing a four game suspension
The leading arm is 100% the right arm in this instance and it is definitely tucked and braced to shoulder IMO.Raidersfan wrote:MRC are absolute **** ... this is clear from the video on Fox (use the slide bar to slow down play)
.. Wighton's leading arm is NOT tucked in ... therefore one of the parameters is **** already.
.. Wighton's left arm is pointing upwards and is on the ball / chest of Edwards indicating that he as attempting to wrap his arms ... another of the parameters ****
Fight it all the way Raiders ... lets make an example of this biased organisation !!
well, I guess you could say that I'm buy curious.
Re: Wighton facing a four game suspension
I've sent an email too.
Feels like I'm living in some kind of dark, parallel universe at the moment with the ticketing fiasco and now **** this.
Feels like I'm living in some kind of dark, parallel universe at the moment with the ticketing fiasco and now **** this.
- Ultima
- Laurie Daley
- Posts: 12466
- Joined: January 18, 2005, 9:46 pm
- Favourite Player: Croker
- Location: Brisbane, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Wighton facing a four game suspension
That's not a shoulder charge though, that's one of the top 10 plays of the week, ask the NRL, it is known...Northern Raider wrote:Beuttner being pedantic with definitions to let off Ennis and charging Jack. I'm wondering where his "element of football" explanation is that applied to this one.
- Raidersfan
- Ruben Wiki
- Posts: 5365
- Joined: March 16, 2013, 4:39 pm
- Favourite Player: George Clooney
Re: Wighton facing a four game suspension
^^^
julian the leading arm must be tucked into his side ... it is NOT tucked into his side ... there is a definite gap between arm and his chest
julian the leading arm must be tucked into his side ... it is NOT tucked into his side ... there is a definite gap between arm and his chest
I don't post facts
-
- Steve Walters
- Posts: 7426
- Joined: August 13, 2008, 3:39 pm
- Favourite Player: Bae
- Location: Canberra
Re: Wighton facing a four game suspension
Oh, do me a favour, Julian.julian87 wrote:The leading arm is 100% the right arm in this instance and it is definitely tucked and braced to shoulder IMO.Raidersfan wrote:MRC are absolute **** ... this is clear from the video on Fox (use the slide bar to slow down play)
.. Wighton's leading arm is NOT tucked in ... therefore one of the parameters is **** already.
.. Wighton's left arm is pointing upwards and is on the ball / chest of Edwards indicating that he as attempting to wrap his arms ... another of the parameters ****
Fight it all the way Raiders ... lets make an example of this biased organisation !!
Inconsistency has 100% been illustrated by the match review committee in a space of 24 hours.
Just run with that, ay, instead of being your usual contrarian self and seeking to disagree with 99% of other people.
- Northern Raider
- Mal Meninga
- Posts: 32624
- Joined: June 19, 2007, 8:17 am
- Favourite Player: Dean Lance
- Location: Greener pastures
Re: Wighton facing a four game suspension
Upper arm tucked into his side my ****
* The author assumes no responsibility for the topicality, correctness, completeness or quality of information provided.
- Gorilla
- Alan Tongue
- Posts: 679
- Joined: July 29, 2009, 9:20 am
- Favourite Player: Ricky Stuart
- Location: Canberra
Re: Wighton facing a four game suspension
Is anyone posting this photographic evidence to the raiders twitter acct? We should be bombarding the club letting them know they gotta fight it.
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
Last edited by Gorilla on September 5, 2016, 2:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Wighton facing a four game suspension
it looks like most of the contact is made with the arm not the shoulder.
Wighton runs in hard and makes good tackles, but if your first contact is with your arm and the most painful contact is the headbutt, it is hard to say it is a worse shoulder charge then ennis' one off the ball, especially since wightons arm isn't tucked in.
Wighton runs in hard and makes good tackles, but if your first contact is with your arm and the most painful contact is the headbutt, it is hard to say it is a worse shoulder charge then ennis' one off the ball, especially since wightons arm isn't tucked in.
Re: Wighton facing a four game suspension
1. Both hands were up.simo wrote:
3. A head clash?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- Raidersfan
- Ruben Wiki
- Posts: 5365
- Joined: March 16, 2013, 4:39 pm
- Favourite Player: George Clooney
Re: Wighton facing a four game suspension
Thanks for that pic NR
Wighton's arm hits the ball carrying arm which Edwards has extended to protect for impact. Wighton's front arm finishes on the ball/chest.
Wighton's arm hits the ball carrying arm which Edwards has extended to protect for impact. Wighton's front arm finishes on the ball/chest.
I don't post facts
Re: Wighton facing a four game suspension
As fans we MUST fight this and do our part for the team! Keep the emails and phone calls, shares, social media posts, and anything you can think of rolling!!!! WE WILL NOT STAND FOR THIS ****!!
Re: Wighton facing a four game suspension
His leading upper arm is definitely tucked into his side.
Let's not pretend here that Wighton's doesn't deserve suspension - it does, as does Ennis'. Edwards was veering away from him and Jack was looking to poleaxe him - it's an inexusable brain snap, absolutely no doubt about that.
To me the problem here is the is the impact and post contact. We've seen this have a big influence on the descisions made by the MRC of late, and it seems to have opened a Pandora's box in terms of their consistency and rulings. Had Ennis have launched right at him and flailed his arms, he'd be in a bit of hot water as well.
Let's not pretend here that Wighton's doesn't deserve suspension - it does, as does Ennis'. Edwards was veering away from him and Jack was looking to poleaxe him - it's an inexusable brain snap, absolutely no doubt about that.
To me the problem here is the is the impact and post contact. We've seen this have a big influence on the descisions made by the MRC of late, and it seems to have opened a Pandora's box in terms of their consistency and rulings. Had Ennis have launched right at him and flailed his arms, he'd be in a bit of hot water as well.
Re: Wighton facing a four game suspension
lets not forget spitting at a female bartender and being choked out by bouncers only to play that very weekend. It really is gob smacking some of the inconsistencies. That Independent commission is a complete and utter failure.Question wrote:Between this and blokes wearing FKL on their arm bands, the NRL is a deadset disgrace of an organisation, now watch for the Titans to be barrowed through the finals as well, like the did with storm many moons ago, Fifa > NRL.