Papalii says family reasons behind flu injection stance
Moderator: GH Moderators
- Northern Raider
- Mal Meninga
- Posts: 32524
- Joined: June 19, 2007, 8:17 am
- Favourite Player: Dean Lance
- Location: Greener pastures
Re: NRL makes landmark call on Canberra Raiders trio
Plenty of work sites with strict conditions of entry relating to health and safety. If you don't accept those conditions you don't get to enter. Those places don't pander to divas who take offense at the wording of waivers.
* The author assumes no responsibility for the topicality, correctness, completeness or quality of information provided.
-
- John Ferguson
- Posts: 2418
- Joined: July 5, 2008, 6:35 pm
- Favourite Player: Big red
- Location: Western NSW
Re: NRL makes landmark call on Canberra Raiders trio
I know plenty of people over the last 3 years that got so sick they needed weeks off work, and they had the flu shot.
I've never had one personally, and haven't got sick at all in that time.
So, why the **** should people be forced to have something that's not proven as 100% effective ?
I've never had one personally, and haven't got sick at all in that time.
So, why the **** should people be forced to have something that's not proven as 100% effective ?
- Northern Raider
- Mal Meninga
- Posts: 32524
- Joined: June 19, 2007, 8:17 am
- Favourite Player: Dean Lance
- Location: Greener pastures
Re: NRL makes landmark call on Canberra Raiders trio
They are not being forced to have a flu shot so any argument along those lines is moot.Neeeegz wrote: ↑May 8, 2020, 8:58 am I know plenty of people over the last 3 years that got so sick they needed weeks off work, and they had the flu shot.
I've never had one personally, and haven't got sick at all in that time.
So, why the **** should people be forced to have something that's not proven as 100% effective ?
* The author assumes no responsibility for the topicality, correctness, completeness or quality of information provided.
Re: NRL makes landmark call on Canberra Raiders trio
Because it's 60% effective? You wear a seatbelt don't you?Neeeegz wrote: ↑May 8, 2020, 8:58 am I know plenty of people over the last 3 years that got so sick they needed weeks off work, and they had the flu shot.
I've never had one personally, and haven't got sick at all in that time.
So, why the **** should people be forced to have something that's not proven as 100% effective ?
-
- John Ferguson
- Posts: 2418
- Joined: July 5, 2008, 6:35 pm
- Favourite Player: Big red
- Location: Western NSW
Re: NRL makes landmark call on Canberra Raiders trio
What a silly comparison. A seatbelt is better than 60% effective...edwahu wrote: ↑May 8, 2020, 9:28 amBecause it's 60% effective? You wear a seatbelt don't you?Neeeegz wrote: ↑May 8, 2020, 8:58 am I know plenty of people over the last 3 years that got so sick they needed weeks off work, and they had the flu shot.
I've never had one personally, and haven't got sick at all in that time.
So, why the **** should people be forced to have something that's not proven as 100% effective ?
Try again
Re: NRL makes landmark call on Canberra Raiders trio
say it with me, "risk mit-i-ga-tion"
Dont delete this GE
- hrundi89
- Brett Mullins
- Posts: 1811
- Joined: January 25, 2007, 10:33 pm
- Favourite Player: Jarrod Croker
- Location: Sydney
Re: Raiders stars protest as NRL considers banning players
When I worked at WT from 2005 to 2008 it was mandatory for all staff, including those of us in the marketing department.DarkRaider wrote: ↑May 7, 2020, 6:35 pmAccording to Phil Gould in his podcast, for a long time it’s actually been standard procedure for every player at every NRL club to get the shot.Bay53 wrote: ↑May 7, 2020, 3:07 pmI think this is a very unfair comment and reflective of what we are likely to see where current standards are used to re-write history.Timbo wrote: ↑May 7, 2020, 1:30 pm This also makes me question all the charity work Sia has done as being incredibly irresponsible.
Imagine if he’d visited your kid who has cancer in hospital and today you’re finding out he’s an anti-vaxxer.
The flu can kill a kid with leukaemia. But hey, muh beliefs and opinions!
I would estimate that 95% of the players in the NRL didn’t get the flu shot in 2019 and no one thought worse of them for it. NRL players would not have been considered in the vulnerable category in the past. There were definitely no restrictions or protocols that anyone entering a hospital was required to have had a flu shot. The government only provided financial assistance to cover the cost for a select handful of the community although many employers also covered the cost. Perhaps NRL players were in this category.
Anti-vaxxer arguments are normally about children not getting the vaccinations for things like measles, rubella etc not flu shots for adults.
Clearly there won’t be things like hospital visits this year, but in future years it may well be that 90+% of the population have a flu shot, so refusal may be seen as a reason to stay away but please don’t try to apply 2020 standards to past years.
No doubt there’d be refusals every year and so the clubs would have had a fair idea that this was coming from certain players.
You may remember me from such forum usernames as hrundi99 and... hrundi99.
Re: NRL makes landmark call on Canberra Raiders trio
Actually seatbelts are about 50% effective in reducing fatal injuries and 60% at reducing serious injuries in an accident.Neeeegz wrote: ↑May 8, 2020, 9:36 amWhat a silly comparison. A seatbelt is better than 60% effective...edwahu wrote: ↑May 8, 2020, 9:28 amBecause it's 60% effective? You wear a seatbelt don't you?Neeeegz wrote: ↑May 8, 2020, 8:58 am I know plenty of people over the last 3 years that got so sick they needed weeks off work, and they had the flu shot.
I've never had one personally, and haven't got sick at all in that time.
So, why the **** should people be forced to have something that's not proven as 100% effective ?
Try again
Why do you think 60% effectiveness in reducing the flu isn't enough? That's hundreds of thousands of lives saved a year.
Re: NRL makes landmark call on Canberra Raiders trio
The Qld Government is asking questions along these lines this morning. The Health Minister has expressed concerns that the NRL’s plan included a ‘no jab, no play’ policy (according to the media report), and that the NRL has already failed to implement the plan shown to the government for approval. A further meeting between the Qld CHO and NRL is to happen today.
Not that I really care if we were to have a comp without Qld teams, but it’s an ordinary look for the NRL.
Re: NRL makes landmark call on Canberra Raiders trio
Queensland government needs to also question their Union affiliates who continue to have their employees work in building construction without Flu jabs and not adhering to social distancing.
Queensland government will also need to ask questions about their State public servants and teachers who have not had their Flu shot.
The Queensland premier seems intent on firing shots at the NRL but never questioning her own hypocrisy.
Queensland government will also need to ask questions about their State public servants and teachers who have not had their Flu shot.
The Queensland premier seems intent on firing shots at the NRL but never questioning her own hypocrisy.
Re: NRL makes landmark call on Canberra Raiders trio
I genuinely don’t know in the first case, but there is currently no requirement for run of the mill public servants to have a flu shot in Queensland, so I don’t think the comparison is valid (and I think you might have sone biases coming through ).BJ wrote: ↑May 8, 2020, 9:55 am Queensland government needs to also question their Union affiliates who continue to have their employees work in building construction without Flu jabs and not adhering to social distancing.
Queensland government will also need to ask questions about their State public servants and teachers who have not had their Flu shot.
The Queensland premier seems intent on firing shots at the NRL but never questioning her own hypocrisy.
The government’s issue is that the NRL has said they will do one thing, the government has given approval on that basis, and the NRL has turned around and done something else. Raising concerns about that is completely reasonable.
Re: NRL makes landmark call on Canberra Raiders trio
The plan submitted to governments always included a waiver... didn't it? That's what I read anyway.
Re: NRL makes landmark call on Canberra Raiders trio
That’s what I thought. The media reporting this morning suggests otherwise, but I don’t know how accurate it is.
https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/ ... -flu-jabs/
Re: NRL makes landmark call on Canberra Raiders trio
Peter V'landys says it was in the plan the governments had approved: https://7news.com.au/sport/rugby-league ... -c-1024676Smurfette wrote: ↑May 8, 2020, 10:25 amThat’s what I thought. The media reporting this morning suggests otherwise, but I don’t know how accurate it is.
https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/ ... -flu-jabs/
-
- David Furner
- Posts: 3763
- Joined: January 6, 2005, 9:42 pm
- Favourite Player: Hudson Young
- Location: Here
Re: NRL makes landmark call on Canberra Raiders trio
Peter V'landys has been saying a lot over the last six weeks, with much of it directly contradicted by the government within a few hours of him saying it.greeneyed wrote: ↑May 8, 2020, 10:32 amPeter V'landys says it was in the plan the governments had approved: https://7news.com.au/sport/rugby-league ... -c-1024676Smurfette wrote: ↑May 8, 2020, 10:25 amThat’s what I thought. The media reporting this morning suggests otherwise, but I don’t know how accurate it is.
https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/ ... -flu-jabs/
Sometimes the light at the end of the tunnel is just the train that's about to hit you.
Re: NRL makes landmark call on Canberra Raiders trio
Largely then I think the government should move on. Makes you wonder though about the specific wording of the plan. Going back to my first post on this, you would think people refusing vaccinations on purely religious or cultural grounds would not be so bothered about signing a waiver that says not getting the flu shot poses some health risks...
Anyway, hopefully the governments decide they’re satisfied and we can just get on with it.
Anyway, hopefully the governments decide they’re satisfied and we can just get on with it.
-
- Brett Mullins
- Posts: 1473
- Joined: July 11, 2015, 5:57 pm
- Favourite Player: Laurie Daley
- Location: Canberra
Re: NRL makes landmark call on Canberra Raiders trio
Listening to Hadley. QLD and NSW CMO’s aren’t happy. Full vacc was a requirement, and guaranteed by the NRL.
Re: NRL makes landmark call on Canberra Raiders trio
And after that, what V’landys said gets confirmed.Timbo wrote: ↑May 8, 2020, 11:14 amPeter V'landys has been saying a lot over the last six weeks, with much of it directly contradicted by the government within a few hours of him saying it.greeneyed wrote: ↑May 8, 2020, 10:32 amPeter V'landys says it was in the plan the governments had approved: https://7news.com.au/sport/rugby-league ... -c-1024676Smurfette wrote: ↑May 8, 2020, 10:25 amThat’s what I thought. The media reporting this morning suggests otherwise, but I don’t know how accurate it is.
https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/ ... -flu-jabs/
Re: NRL makes landmark call on Canberra Raiders trio
Ive found that very interesting... the cycle is something you can set your watch.greeneyed wrote: ↑May 8, 2020, 12:15 pmAnd after that, what V’landys said gets confirmed.Timbo wrote: ↑May 8, 2020, 11:14 amPeter V'landys has been saying a lot over the last six weeks, with much of it directly contradicted by the government within a few hours of him saying it.greeneyed wrote: ↑May 8, 2020, 10:32 amPeter V'landys says it was in the plan the governments had approved: https://7news.com.au/sport/rugby-league ... -c-1024676Smurfette wrote: ↑May 8, 2020, 10:25 amThat’s what I thought. The media reporting this morning suggests otherwise, but I don’t know how accurate it is.
https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/ ... -flu-jabs/
V'landys come out and makes an announcement, state and federal authorities say "well we havent agreed to that, those comments are premature" and within 24 hours the state and federal authorities agree to what was announced.
Re: NRL makes landmark call on Canberra Raiders trio
Yes I was actually being glib about the public servants getting Flu shots.Smurfette wrote:I genuinely don’t know in the first case, but there is currently no requirement for run of the mill public servants to have a flu shot in Queensland, so I don’t think the comparison is valid (and I think you might have sone biases coming through ).BJ wrote: ↑May 8, 2020, 9:55 am Queensland government needs to also question their Union affiliates who continue to have their employees work in building construction without Flu jabs and not adhering to social distancing.
Queensland government will also need to ask questions about their State public servants and teachers who have not had their Flu shot.
The Queensland premier seems intent on firing shots at the NRL but never questioning her own hypocrisy.
The government’s issue is that the NRL has said they will do one thing, the government has given approval on that basis, and the NRL has turned around and done something else. Raising concerns about that is completely reasonable.
But any biases I have..... are multiplied by NSW and QLD governments who seem happy to publicly fire off shots at the NRL but actively ignore other sectors of business who are acting far worse and have infinitely caught and created more cases of Covid than NRL employees.
Which obviously isn’t statistically hard whilst NRL Covid cases are still at Zero.
How about the State Governments attack Mining, Construction and Clothing retail employees who have actually caught and spread the virus.
Re: NRL makes landmark call on Canberra Raiders trio
I'm confused as to how "religion" is being used to be anti-vax. Which ancient religious text forbids vaccinations? Verses please? I'll bet there aren't any. It's like using religion as an excuse to be anti-5G or something. Ridiculous.
I also note that only 3% of NRL players were against the flu jab. So what about all the other religious or Polynesian players at other clubs that were ok with the jab? Either it's got nothing to do with religion, or they don't take it seriously.
When ScoMo introduced the "no jab no play" policy, I thought initially there was only one minor religious cult somewhere that was believed to be against vaccinations on religious grounds, but later revealed that wasn't the case, so there were no need for exemptions based on religious grounds. But now all of sudden these players are using "religion" to not get the flu shot? Seems convenient.
I also note that only 3% of NRL players were against the flu jab. So what about all the other religious or Polynesian players at other clubs that were ok with the jab? Either it's got nothing to do with religion, or they don't take it seriously.
When ScoMo introduced the "no jab no play" policy, I thought initially there was only one minor religious cult somewhere that was believed to be against vaccinations on religious grounds, but later revealed that wasn't the case, so there were no need for exemptions based on religious grounds. But now all of sudden these players are using "religion" to not get the flu shot? Seems convenient.
Ata Mariota’s #1 fan. Bless his cotton socks.
- yurithe1
- David Furner
- Posts: 3587
- Joined: March 16, 2008, 10:27 am
- Favourite Player: Jordan Rapana
- Location: Canberra
Re: NRL makes landmark call on Canberra Raiders trio
Just as an aside, once seat belts were made mandatory, a car accident injury called "flail chest" virtually disappeared from Emergency Depts. Unrestrained drivers would be propelled forward into the centre of the the steering wheel and have their sternum smashed inwards. Steering wheel designs have changed since then to further reduce the likelihood of this happening.edwahu wrote: ↑May 8, 2020, 9:44 amActually seatbelts are about 50% effective in reducing fatal injuries and 60% at reducing serious injuries in an accident.Neeeegz wrote: ↑May 8, 2020, 9:36 amWhat a silly comparison. A seatbelt is better than 60% effective...edwahu wrote: ↑May 8, 2020, 9:28 amBecause it's 60% effective? You wear a seatbelt don't you?Neeeegz wrote: ↑May 8, 2020, 8:58 am I know plenty of people over the last 3 years that got so sick they needed weeks off work, and they had the flu shot.
I've never had one personally, and haven't got sick at all in that time.
So, why the **** should people be forced to have something that's not proven as 100% effective ?
Try again
Why do you think 60% effectiveness in reducing the flu isn't enough? That's hundreds of thousands of lives saved a year.
Some people talk about the weather. Others do something about it.
MEMBER NO.: 4500 (before they changed the numbering system).
MEMBER NO.: 4500 (before they changed the numbering system).
Re: NRL makes landmark call on Canberra Raiders trio
Because construction workers and professional rugby league players are not the same??BJ wrote: ↑May 8, 2020, 12:55 pmYes I was actually being glib about the public servants getting Flu shots.Smurfette wrote:I genuinely don’t know in the first case, but there is currently no requirement for run of the mill public servants to have a flu shot in Queensland, so I don’t think the comparison is valid (and I think you might have sone biases coming through ).BJ wrote: ↑May 8, 2020, 9:55 am Queensland government needs to also question their Union affiliates who continue to have their employees work in building construction without Flu jabs and not adhering to social distancing.
Queensland government will also need to ask questions about their State public servants and teachers who have not had their Flu shot.
The Queensland premier seems intent on firing shots at the NRL but never questioning her own hypocrisy.
The government’s issue is that the NRL has said they will do one thing, the government has given approval on that basis, and the NRL has turned around and done something else. Raising concerns about that is completely reasonable.
But any biases I have..... are multiplied by NSW and QLD governments who seem happy to publicly fire off shots at the NRL but actively ignore other sectors of business who are acting far worse and have infinitely caught and created more cases of Covid than NRL employees.
Which obviously isn’t statistically hard whilst NRL Covid cases are still at Zero.
How about the State Governments attack Mining, Construction and Clothing retail employees who have actually caught and spread the virus.
The construction industry has been deemed an essential service to help and try to prevent the economy from completely collapsing, while the NRL is a niche industry that has managed to get an exemption from state and federal governments and is now trying to move the goal posts from which they agreed. Why is this hard for you to understand??
Re: NRL makes landmark call on Canberra Raiders trio
What makes you think I don’t understand that?Riaan wrote:Because construction workers and professional rugby league players are not the same??BJ wrote: ↑May 8, 2020, 12:55 pmYes I was actually being glib about the public servants getting Flu shots.Smurfette wrote:I genuinely don’t know in the first case, but there is currently no requirement for run of the mill public servants to have a flu shot in Queensland, so I don’t think the comparison is valid (and I think you might have sone biases coming through ).BJ wrote: ↑May 8, 2020, 9:55 am Queensland government needs to also question their Union affiliates who continue to have their employees work in building construction without Flu jabs and not adhering to social distancing.
Queensland government will also need to ask questions about their State public servants and teachers who have not had their Flu shot.
The Queensland premier seems intent on firing shots at the NRL but never questioning her own hypocrisy.
The government’s issue is that the NRL has said they will do one thing, the government has given approval on that basis, and the NRL has turned around and done something else. Raising concerns about that is completely reasonable.
But any biases I have..... are multiplied by NSW and QLD governments who seem happy to publicly fire off shots at the NRL but actively ignore other sectors of business who are acting far worse and have infinitely caught and created more cases of Covid than NRL employees.
Which obviously isn’t statistically hard whilst NRL Covid cases are still at Zero.
How about the State Governments attack Mining, Construction and Clothing retail employees who have actually caught and spread the virus.
The construction industry has been deemed an essential service to help and try to prevent the economy from completely collapsing, while the NRL is a niche industry that has managed to get an exemption from state and federal governments and is now trying to move the goal posts from which they agreed. Why is this hard for you to understand??
I’m pointing out the hypocrisy between political comments NOT why some Industry’s should or should not be open for business.
- Humphrey B Flaubert
- David Grant
- Posts: 702
- Joined: January 9, 2005, 5:22 pm
- Location: Suburban Sydney
Re: NRL makes landmark call on Canberra Raiders trio
This is a flu jab nightmare. Whilst I get the jab myself every year, and I understand the risk mitigation around players who don't get it could be at higher risk to covid-19, I am sceptical of the push to enforce this. The example I would use is what would they do in a case of a player being a Type 1 Diabetic. By nature, this puts the player at higher risk of contracting infections etc. They could take the flu shot, but still be at a higher risk. Would this player then be banned? It's opening a pandoras box I think. Sure it's easier if the players just get the jab and move on, but it would be really **** should the premiership window be slammed shut by something like this because Papa is pretty integral to the team, as are Sia and Taps.
Speed limits are just suggestions....Like pants!
Re: NRL makes landmark call on Canberra Raiders trio
V'Landys: The government said we're allowed to do thisBotman wrote: ↑May 8, 2020, 12:30 pmIve found that very interesting... the cycle is something you can set your watch.greeneyed wrote: ↑May 8, 2020, 12:15 pmAnd after that, what V’landys said gets confirmed.Timbo wrote: ↑May 8, 2020, 11:14 amPeter V'landys has been saying a lot over the last six weeks, with much of it directly contradicted by the government within a few hours of him saying it.greeneyed wrote: ↑May 8, 2020, 10:32 amPeter V'landys says it was in the plan the governments had approved: https://7news.com.au/sport/rugby-league ... -c-1024676Smurfette wrote: ↑May 8, 2020, 10:25 am
That’s what I thought. The media reporting this morning suggests otherwise, but I don’t know how accurate it is.
https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/ ... -flu-jabs/
V'landys come out and makes an announcement, state and federal authorities say "well we havent agreed to that, those comments are premature" and within 24 hours the state and federal authorities agree to what was announced.
Government: Ummm.... no you haven't
V'Landys: Yeah you have
Government: Yeah you have
Repeat.
- FuiFui BradBrad
- Bradley Clyde
- Posts: 8651
- Joined: May 3, 2008, 10:23 pm
- Favourite Player: Phil Graham
- Location: Marsden Park
Re: NRL makes landmark call on Canberra Raiders trio
I'm pretty sure V'Landys got his approach from The Office. It's exactly how Pam for the Office Administrator job
Feel free to call me RickyRicky StickStick if you like. I will also accept Super Fui, King Brad, Kid Dynamite, Chocolate-Thunda... or Brad.
Nickman's love of NSW
Nickman's love of NSW
- NSW has done a superb job - 18/12/2020
- NSW has been world-class with their approach to date, that's a fact. - 04/02/2021
-
- Jason Croker
- Posts: 4908
- Joined: July 26, 2015, 8:24 pm
- Favourite Player: Croker, Cotric, Sezer
- Location: The Land of Lime Green
Re: NRL makes landmark call on Canberra Raiders trio
Ah, I knew some **** would bring this argument.
Pray tell, how many other people are affected by a woman's decision to abort? Exactly, nobody. Vaccination and abortion are not comparable topics in the slightest.
Sia, Papa and Taps could bring down their whole team with this. They could cause the end of livelihoods if their stance is part of the reason that the governments refuse the NRL permission to restart. And that's not even getting into the whole spreading-it-to-vulnerable people thing.
Get on your bike, pal.
And to all the people who doubted me, hello to them as well. - Mark Webber, Raiders Ballboy and Unluckiest F1 Driver Ever
I'm attacking in the right way, instead of just...attacking in the general direction. - Max Aaron (also eerily apropos for the Green Machine)
I'm attacking in the right way, instead of just...attacking in the general direction. - Max Aaron (also eerily apropos for the Green Machine)
- Northern Raider
- Mal Meninga
- Posts: 32524
- Joined: June 19, 2007, 8:17 am
- Favourite Player: Dean Lance
- Location: Greener pastures
Re: NRL makes landmark call on Canberra Raiders trio
Hadley had become a mouthpiece for Ch9 anti-NRL propaganda so I'll take anything he says with a grain of salt. He may be accurate but I can't trust his impartiality on the topic.
* The author assumes no responsibility for the topicality, correctness, completeness or quality of information provided.
-
- David Furner
- Posts: 3763
- Joined: January 6, 2005, 9:42 pm
- Favourite Player: Hudson Young
- Location: Here
Re: NRL makes landmark call on Canberra Raiders trio
It's popping up on a few journos on twitter. Governments are saying the NRL promised 100% vaccinations unless medically exempt and that's part of the deal for the restart.Northern Raider wrote: ↑May 8, 2020, 2:12 pmHadley had become a mouthpiece for Ch9 anti-NRL propaganda so I'll take anything he says with a grain of salt. He may be accurate but I can't trust his impartiality on the topic.
Once again it seems V'landys spoke without consulting anyone.
Sometimes the light at the end of the tunnel is just the train that's about to hit you.
-
- Gary Belcher
- Posts: 6247
- Joined: January 8, 2005, 1:25 pm
- Favourite Player: Jordan Rapana
- Location: Sydney
Re: NRL makes landmark call on Canberra Raiders trio
@ChrisGarry7
BREAKING: re Bryce Cartwright.. He's signed new waiver. HOWEVER, government has made it clear to NRL this morning, new waiver isn't good enough and they want everyone to have a flu shot and "No Jab, No Play" rule enforced. Massive drama to develop during day @7NewsBrisbane
Well this will be interesting.
BREAKING: re Bryce Cartwright.. He's signed new waiver. HOWEVER, government has made it clear to NRL this morning, new waiver isn't good enough and they want everyone to have a flu shot and "No Jab, No Play" rule enforced. Massive drama to develop during day @7NewsBrisbane
Well this will be interesting.
Re: NRL makes landmark call on Canberra Raiders trio
If this follows the same pattern as everything else, im setting the line of midday tomorrow before the government agree to allow the competition to restart with the new waivers.
- Northern Raider
- Mal Meninga
- Posts: 32524
- Joined: June 19, 2007, 8:17 am
- Favourite Player: Dean Lance
- Location: Greener pastures
Re: NRL makes landmark call on Canberra Raiders trio
On this one I'd be happy for the Government to dig the heels in. This is a WH&S requirement to enter a work site under strict biosecurity measures during a global pandemic. If people have a moral issue with it then that's fine but they cannot enter that work site without having the shot.
* The author assumes no responsibility for the topicality, correctness, completeness or quality of information provided.
Re: NRL makes landmark call on Canberra Raiders trio
Me too. I hope they do stick to their guns.Northern Raider wrote: ↑May 8, 2020, 2:51 pm On this one I'd be happy for the Government to dig the heels in. This is a WH&S requirement to enter a work site under strict biosecurity measures during a global pandemic. If people have a moral issue with it then that's fine but they cannot enter that work site without having the shot.
V'landys seems to get what he wants though from what ive seen
-
- David Furner
- Posts: 3763
- Joined: January 6, 2005, 9:42 pm
- Favourite Player: Hudson Young
- Location: Here
Re: NRL makes landmark call on Canberra Raiders trio
As would I.Northern Raider wrote: ↑May 8, 2020, 2:51 pm On this one I'd be happy for the Government to dig the heels in. This is a WH&S requirement to enter a work site under strict biosecurity measures during a global pandemic. If people have a moral issue with it then that's fine but they cannot enter that work site without having the shot.
My disappointment in these three is immeasurable and I would rather play without them than pander to their sense of entitlement.
Sometimes the light at the end of the tunnel is just the train that's about to hit you.