Who are you talking to?The Rickman wrote: ↑September 13, 2019, 9:34 pm Good grief, he’s talking to himself again, isn’t he?
Hudson Young suspended for eight weeks
Moderator: GH Moderators
- Northern Raider
- Mal Meninga
- Posts: 32584
- Joined: June 19, 2007, 8:17 am
- Favourite Player: Dean Lance
- Location: Greener pastures
Re: Hudson Young suspended for eight weeks
* The author assumes no responsibility for the topicality, correctness, completeness or quality of information provided.
- yeh raiders
- Laurie Daley
- Posts: 17140
- Joined: June 21, 2008, 3:04 pm
- Favourite Player: Jack Wighton
- Location: Sydney
Re: Hudson Young suspended for eight weeks
Northern Raider wrote: ↑September 13, 2019, 10:07 pmWho are you talking to?The Rickman wrote: ↑September 13, 2019, 9:34 pm Good grief, he’s talking to himself again, isn’t he?
-
- Laurie Daley
- Posts: 12655
- Joined: April 29, 2017, 7:22 pm
- Favourite Player: Ashley Gilbert
Re: Hudson Young suspended for eight weeks
I’m impressed with Nicks efforts to bring back “good grief” as a thing. Not since Charlie Brown in the Peanuts strip has anyone used the tag line with such commitment!yeh raiders wrote: ↑September 13, 2019, 10:36 pmNorthern Raider wrote: ↑September 13, 2019, 10:07 pmWho are you talking to?The Rickman wrote: ↑September 13, 2019, 9:34 pm Good grief, he’s talking to himself again, isn’t he?
- zim
- Laurie Daley
- Posts: 10693
- Joined: July 8, 2015, 3:38 pm
- Favourite Player: NRL: Joseph Tapine
NRLW: Grace Kemp - Location: Sydney
Re: Hudson Young suspended for eight weeks
My personal favourite was IHAGF. There's another one with something like 26 letters but I don't have enough of an attention span to
- Seiffert82
- Mal Meninga
- Posts: 28130
- Joined: March 17, 2007, 12:24 pm
- Favourite Player: Bay56
Re: Hudson Young suspended for eight weeks
Sounds reasonable, except for the bit where Young thought it was OK to hold a player up from grounding the ball by sticking his fingers near the bloke's eyes.Boomercm wrote: ↑September 12, 2019, 9:33 pmpeople are paying way too much attention to the way it looked (and their feelings/reaction), and not enough to the logical weight of all the other evidence. This is a typical cognitive bias as we have lots of brain space dedicated to vision, and it looked icky.Seiffert82 wrote: ↑September 11, 2019, 11:35 pm Can't believe he only got 8 weeks.
Whether or not you believe it was unintentional is largely irrelevant. The guy is an idiot for going anywhere near Pompey's eyes. It looked really, really ordinary on replay.
But all of the other evidence suggests no gouge. His explanation of trying to hold him up accounts for the visuals (but doesn't seem to match the initial icky feeling, so seems less believable). It was a terrible judiciary decision, from a legal/criminal justice standards viewpoint.
And if he didn't have the prior incident he would never have been found guilty. Which suggests he should never have been found guilty. Prior record helps determine penalty once found guilty. It should not influence verdict.
I'm sorry, but it's similar to the NRL outlawing players from sliding into tackles with their boots, ala Billy Slater, in an attempt to lodge the ball free from the scorers hands. It's dangerous and it's a terrible look and it's now illegal.
I've never seen a player attempt to hold up the try scorer by shoving his fingers near their eyes. I don't care what the logic is, it's a bad look because it looked pretty **** bad...especially from a player who just got back from a similar suspension.
Last edited by Seiffert82 on September 14, 2019, 2:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Seiffert82
- Mal Meninga
- Posts: 28130
- Joined: March 17, 2007, 12:24 pm
- Favourite Player: Bay56
Re: Hudson Young suspended for eight weeks
Seriously...you simply can't defend those screenshots.PigRickman wrote: ↑September 13, 2019, 10:20 am We all agree there was dangerous contact to the face, right?
So all we're missing is whether there was contact with the eye in that...
I mean you guys can believe that this action had no contact with the eye that if you want, but i'm not in the business of buying Bull to exonerate a three time eye gouger. The judiciary isn't burdened by some requirement to find the man guilty "beyond reasonable doubt".
in fact as per the NRL judicary Code Of Procedures:
Onus and Standard of Proof
72. In every case, the Judiciary Counsel bears the onus of proof on the balance of probabilities.
--
The balance of probability is contact with the eye was made, and it was deliberate and dangerous.
1-2-3 stikes, you're out.
Hopefully the guy learns his lesson and never does it again.
Re: Hudson Young suspended for eight weeks
I am not a Doctor (congratulations on that achievement) but I do know that diversion is a classic way to avoid a question. I have been in hundreds of negotiations dealing with contractors over the years and recognize a defensive tactic when I see one. You have simply avoided the question asked: 'What is Young doing with his right hand?' It's likely you really know the obvious answer.Boomercm wrote: ↑September 13, 2019, 8:59 pmlook at the Cameron Smith photo's from last round. Was he pulling ears?
Again, classic visual bias. And all everyone got at first was the vision and commentators going off in a frenzy. So everyone formed their opinion and said their piece before any other evidence was collected.
Again. I'm not saying I know the truth. Just saying the judiciary did not act anything like a a judiciary should. They all acted like average punters. They obviously get no training or legal grounding.
(fyi - to give some background here... I'm a Dr Clinincal Psychology who has a grounding in the memory research and the fallibility of eye witness testimony. So I'm not that upset as a Raiders fan, but I am upset as a league fan who cares about the principles of judicial decision making. The guilty verdict was embarrassing from a this perspective)
-
- Mal Meninga
- Posts: 51208
- Joined: June 25, 2012, 9:53 am
- Favourite Player: Hodgo
- Location: Rockhampton, Central Queensland
Re: Hudson Young suspended for eight weeks
IFAMIYWMSzim wrote:My personal favourite was IHAGF. There's another one with something like 26 letters but I don't have enough of an attention span to
Re: Hudson Young suspended for eight weeks
Exactly. It doesn't matter how many times people say "it's not his go, he's a good bloke" and he wasn't given a fair trial ... look at those images and the footage of the incident and tell me he's not guilty.Seiffert82 wrote:Seriously...you simply can't defend those screenshots.PigRickman wrote: ↑September 13, 2019, 10:20 am We all agree there was dangerous contact to the face, right?
So all we're missing is whether there was contact with the eye in that...
I mean you guys can believe that this action had no contact with the eye that if you want, but i'm not in the business of buying Bull to exonerate a three time eye gouger. The judiciary isn't burdened by some requirement to find the man guilty "beyond reasonable doubt".
in fact as per the NRL judicary Code Of Procedures:
Onus and Standard of Proof
72. In every case, the Judiciary Counsel bears the onus of proof on the balance of probabilities.
--
The balance of probability is contact with the eye was made, and it was deliberate and dangerous.
1-2-3 stikes, you're out.
Hopefully the guy learns his lesson and never does it again.
If a player from another club did that to one of our players we would all be screaming for a lengthy suspension.
Sent from my SM-G570F using Tapatalk
Shoving it in your face since 2017
- zim
- Laurie Daley
- Posts: 10693
- Joined: July 8, 2015, 3:38 pm
- Favourite Player: NRL: Joseph Tapine
NRLW: Grace Kemp - Location: Sydney
Re: Hudson Young suspended for eight weeks
The Rickman wrote: ↑September 14, 2019, 6:10 amIFAMIYWMSzim wrote:My personal favourite was IHAGF. There's another one with something like 26 letters but I don't have enough of an attention span to
-
- Mal Meninga
- Posts: 51208
- Joined: June 25, 2012, 9:53 am
- Favourite Player: Hodgo
- Location: Rockhampton, Central Queensland
Hudson Young suspended for eight weeks
You also can’t argue it’s not a bloke’s go when it’s his third offence and he clearly has a problem with it.gergreg wrote:Exactly. It doesn't matter how many times people say "it's not his go, he's a good bloke" and he wasn't given a fair trial ... look at those images and the footage of the incident and tell me he's not guilty.Seiffert82 wrote:Seriously...you simply can't defend those screenshots.PigRickman wrote: ↑September 13, 2019, 10:20 am We all agree there was dangerous contact to the face, right?
So all we're missing is whether there was contact with the eye in that...
I mean you guys can believe that this action had no contact with the eye that if you want, but i'm not in the business of buying Bull to exonerate a three time eye gouger. The judiciary isn't burdened by some requirement to find the man guilty "beyond reasonable doubt".
in fact as per the NRL judicary Code Of Procedures:
Onus and Standard of Proof
72. In every case, the Judiciary Counsel bears the onus of proof on the balance of probabilities.
--
The balance of probability is contact with the eye was made, and it was deliberate and dangerous.
1-2-3 stikes, you're out.
Hopefully the guy learns his lesson and never does it again.
If a player from another club did that to one of our players we would all be screaming for a lengthy suspension.
Sent from my SM-G570F using Tapatalk
First offence, yeah maybe, it’s a rush of blood or whatever. But this is a genuine problem. Burying our heads in the sand and blaming the judiciary won’t help us one iota.
Re: Hudson Young suspended for eight weeks
I had this strange dream last night. I had a few beers with some mates and had an 'engaging debate' about the HY decision. When I got home I got on my favourite fan site and used my work credentials to try and win the very same argument. I woke slightly embarrassed...Billy Walker wrote: ↑September 13, 2019, 9:20 pmI agree with you Boomercm, but I feel the bigger question here is as a Dr Clinical Psychology do you visit the GH to satisfy your interest in the Raiders or to study some of the posters here? I bet there wouldn’t be enough time in the day to start making sense of some on here....Boomercm wrote: ↑September 13, 2019, 8:59 pmlook at the Cameron Smith photo's from last round. Was he pulling ears?
Again, classic visual bias. And all everyone got at first was the vision and commentators going off in a frenzy. So everyone formed their opinion and said their piece before any other evidence was collected.
Again. I'm not saying I know the truth. Just saying the judiciary did not act anything like a a judiciary should. They all acted like average punters. They obviously get no training or legal grounding.
(fyi - to give some background here... I'm a Dr Clinincal Psychology who has a grounding in the memory research and the fallibility of eye witness testimony. So I'm not that upset as a Raiders fan, but I am upset as a league fan who cares about the principles of judicial decision making. The guilty verdict was embarrassing from a this perspective)
Re: Hudson Young suspended for eight weeks
I'd definitely say it is his go. His go is gouging eyes.The Rickman wrote:You also can’t argue it’s not a bloke’s go when it’s his third offence and he clearly has a problem with it.gergreg wrote:Exactly. It doesn't matter how many times people say "it's not his go, he's a good bloke" and he wasn't given a fair trial ... look at those images and the footage of the incident and tell me he's not guilty.Seiffert82 wrote:Seriously...you simply can't defend those screenshots.PigRickman wrote: ↑September 13, 2019, 10:20 am We all agree there was dangerous contact to the face, right?
So all we're missing is whether there was contact with the eye in that...
I mean you guys can believe that this action had no contact with the eye that if you want, but i'm not in the business of buying Bull to exonerate a three time eye gouger. The judiciary isn't burdened by some requirement to find the man guilty "beyond reasonable doubt".
in fact as per the NRL judicary Code Of Procedures:
Onus and Standard of Proof
72. In every case, the Judiciary Counsel bears the onus of proof on the balance of probabilities.
--
The balance of probability is contact with the eye was made, and it was deliberate and dangerous.
1-2-3 stikes, you're out.
Hopefully the guy learns his lesson and never does it again.
If a player from another club did that to one of our players we would all be screaming for a lengthy suspension.
Sent from my SM-G570F using Tapatalk
First offence, yeah maybe, it’s a rush of blood or whatever. But this is a genuine problem. Burying our heads in the sand and blaming the judiciary won’t help us one iota.
Re: Hudson Young suspended for eight weeks
Back to a regular argument and away from judicial process...The Rickman wrote: ↑September 14, 2019, 10:06 amYou also can’t argue it’s not a bloke’s go when it’s his third offence and he clearly has a problem with it.gergreg wrote:Exactly. It doesn't matter how many times people say "it's not his go, he's a good bloke" and he wasn't given a fair trial ... look at those images and the footage of the incident and tell me he's not guilty.Seiffert82 wrote:Seriously...you simply can't defend those screenshots.PigRickman wrote: ↑September 13, 2019, 10:20 am We all agree there was dangerous contact to the face, right?
So all we're missing is whether there was contact with the eye in that...
I mean you guys can believe that this action had no contact with the eye that if you want, but i'm not in the business of buying Bull to exonerate a three time eye gouger. The judiciary isn't burdened by some requirement to find the man guilty "beyond reasonable doubt".
in fact as per the NRL judicary Code Of Procedures:
Onus and Standard of Proof
72. In every case, the Judiciary Counsel bears the onus of proof on the balance of probabilities.
--
The balance of probability is contact with the eye was made, and it was deliberate and dangerous.
1-2-3 stikes, you're out.
Hopefully the guy learns his lesson and never does it again.
If a player from another club did that to one of our players we would all be screaming for a lengthy suspension.
Sent from my SM-G570F using Tapatalk
First offence, yeah maybe, it’s a rush of blood or whatever. But this is a genuine problem. Burying our heads in the sand and blaming the judiciary won’t help us one iota.
Two questions:
(1) If he is such a well practised eye gouger, and he was deliberately taking the opportunity to have a double crack at an eye gouge on a completely defenceless player.... why didn't Pompey react in any way? How did he come out of it completely unscathed?
(2) In the souths game there was some niggle. But the Warriors game was like a dead rubber. We barely gave a sh*t and nor did they. Paps aside, the whole team (including HY) looked disengaged for most of it. Where does the motivation for him to gouge this bloke come from? Especially given its a try so def going to be reviewed... and the obvious consequences with his history.
It makes no sense, aside from HY being a really really really dumb c*nt. I just don't see it. The boys would not have rallied around him like they have if this was the case.
-
- Mal Meninga
- Posts: 51208
- Joined: June 25, 2012, 9:53 am
- Favourite Player: Hodgo
- Location: Rockhampton, Central Queensland
Re: Hudson Young suspended for eight weeks
Billy, I'm not arguing with you and your alts any further... all the logical and reasonable posters on the Greenhouse agree with me, a whole bunch of people I've never seen even post before this discussion (except Billy) disagree with me. That's all I need to close out this "debate".
Re: Hudson Young suspended for eight weeks
Who knows, who cares.Boomercm wrote:Back to a regular argument and away from judicial process...The Rickman wrote: ↑September 14, 2019, 10:06 amYou also can’t argue it’s not a bloke’s go when it’s his third offence and he clearly has a problem with it.gergreg wrote:Exactly. It doesn't matter how many times people say "it's not his go, he's a good bloke" and he wasn't given a fair trial ... look at those images and the footage of the incident and tell me he's not guilty.Seiffert82 wrote:Seriously...you simply can't defend those screenshots.PigRickman wrote: ↑September 13, 2019, 10:20 am We all agree there was dangerous contact to the face, right?
So all we're missing is whether there was contact with the eye in that...
I mean you guys can believe that this action had no contact with the eye that if you want, but i'm not in the business of buying Bull to exonerate a three time eye gouger. The judiciary isn't burdened by some requirement to find the man guilty "beyond reasonable doubt".
in fact as per the NRL judicary Code Of Procedures:
Onus and Standard of Proof
72. In every case, the Judiciary Counsel bears the onus of proof on the balance of probabilities.
--
The balance of probability is contact with the eye was made, and it was deliberate and dangerous.
1-2-3 stikes, you're out.
Hopefully the guy learns his lesson and never does it again.
If a player from another club did that to one of our players we would all be screaming for a lengthy suspension.
Sent from my SM-G570F using Tapatalk
First offence, yeah maybe, it’s a rush of blood or whatever. But this is a genuine problem. Burying our heads in the sand and blaming the judiciary won’t help us one iota.
Two questions:
(1) If he is such a well practised eye gouger, and he was deliberately taking the opportunity to have a double crack at an eye gouge on a completely defenceless player.... why didn't Pompey react in any way? How did he come out of it completely unscathed?
(2) In the souths game there was some niggle. But the Warriors game was like a dead rubber. We barely gave a sh*t and nor did they. Paps aside, the whole team (including HY) looked disengaged for most of it. Where does the motivation for him to gouge this bloke come from? Especially given its a try so def going to be reviewed... and the obvious consequences with his history.
It makes no sense, aside from HY being a really really really dumb c*nt. I just don't see it. The boys would not have rallied around him like they have if this was the case.
How can you look at those images and say to yourself 'it's not worthy of suspension?'
Sent from my SM-G570F using Tapatalk
Shoving it in your face since 2017
-
- Mal Meninga
- Posts: 51208
- Joined: June 25, 2012, 9:53 am
- Favourite Player: Hodgo
- Location: Rockhampton, Central Queensland
Re: Hudson Young suspended for eight weeks
It's called trolling gerg, and it's pretty easy to do when you're a master at it.
- gangrenous
- Laurie Daley
- Posts: 16705
- Joined: May 12, 2007, 10:42 pm
Hudson Young suspended for eight weeks
Boomercm wrote: I had this strange dream last night. I had a few beers with some mates and had an 'engaging debate' about the HY decision. When I got home I got on my favourite fan site and used my work credentials to try and win the very same argument. I woke slightly embarrassed...
Shake it off Dr.Boom. You’re alright
You might recall Wighton putting a blatant shoulder charge on in a dead rubber too.Boomercm wrote: (2) In the souths game there was some niggle. But the Warriors game was like a dead rubber. We barely gave a sh*t and nor did they. Paps aside, the whole team (including HY) looked disengaged for most of it. Where does the motivation for him to gouge this bloke come from? Especially given its a try so def going to be reviewed... and the obvious consequences with his history.
It makes no sense, aside from HY being a really really really dumb c*nt. I just don't see it. The boys would not have rallied around him like they have if this was the case.
-
- Laurie Daley
- Posts: 12655
- Joined: April 29, 2017, 7:22 pm
- Favourite Player: Ashley Gilbert
Re: Hudson Young suspended for eight weeks
You make me laugh Nicko - I’ve got no aliases and have never posted on here under any other name. But in any case why see this as a competition or a battle? I think it’s been a really interesting discussion. The bottom line is HY is serving an 8 week ban and nothing you, me or anyone else says will change that. I’ve think people have put forward some really interesting views on both sides. You, Red, Pig and others have made a strong case that he should have got more and maybe isn’t a great fit with club culture. GE has made some great points about the NRL needing to clean up any attacks on the head or face. I think Dr Boom and others have provided great arguments as to why he should have got off. It’s not a discussion to be won or lost and I don’t think anyone is trolling. Isn’t this how forums are supposed to work? We kick around different views on things we have an interest in to kill time between games?The Rickman wrote: ↑September 14, 2019, 11:11 am Billy, I'm not arguing with you and your alts any further... all the logical and reasonable posters on the Greenhouse agree with me, a whole bunch of people I've never seen even post before this discussion (except Billy) disagree with me. That's all I need to close out this "debate".
Re: Hudson Young suspended for eight weeks
I think you should shut up.
-
- Mal Meninga
- Posts: 51208
- Joined: June 25, 2012, 9:53 am
- Favourite Player: Hodgo
- Location: Rockhampton, Central Queensland
Re: Hudson Young suspended for eight weeks
Hey Billy were you at the game tonight? Did you get to catch up with anyone else from the forum? Anybody else able to vouch for you as a person?
Maybe I’ll see you at the grand final? Happy to shout you beers all night, pal
Maybe I’ll see you at the grand final? Happy to shout you beers all night, pal
Re: Hudson Young suspended for eight weeks
Free beer.... I'm Spartacus.The Rickman wrote:Hey Billy were you at the game tonight? Did you get to catch up with anyone else from the forum? Anybody else able to vouch for you as a person?
Maybe I’ll see you at the grand final? Happy to shout you beers all night, pal
Sent from my SM-G570F using Tapatalk
Shoving it in your face since 2017
-
- Laurie Daley
- Posts: 12655
- Joined: April 29, 2017, 7:22 pm
- Favourite Player: Ashley Gilbert
Re: Hudson Young suspended for eight weeks
Sounds good to me!The Rickman wrote: ↑September 14, 2019, 10:33 pm Hey Billy were you at the game tonight? Did you get to catch up with anyone else from the forum? Anybody else able to vouch for you as a person?
Maybe I’ll see you at the grand final? Happy to shout you beers all night, pal
Re: Hudson Young suspended for eight weeks
It's me. I'm Billy.The Rickman wrote: Maybe I’ll see you at the grand final? Happy to shout you beers all night, pal
Son, we live in a world that has forums, and those forums have to be guarded by Mods. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Nickman? I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. You weep for Lucy, and you curse GE. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know -- that GE’s moderation, while tragic, probably saved lives; and my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, keeps threads on track and under the appropriately sized, highlighted green headings.
You want moderation because deep down in places you don't talk about at parties, you want me on that forum -- you need me on that forum. We use words like "stay on topic," "use the appropriate forum," "please delete." We use these words as the backbone of a life spent defending something. You use them as a punch line. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very moderation that I provide and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather that you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest you get a green handle and edit a post. Either way, I don't give a DAMN what you think about moderation.
-
- Mal Meninga
- Posts: 51208
- Joined: June 25, 2012, 9:53 am
- Favourite Player: Hodgo
- Location: Rockhampton, Central Queensland
Re: Hudson Young suspended for eight weeks
Hooray!Billy Walker wrote:Sounds good to me!The Rickman wrote: ↑September 14, 2019, 10:33 pm Hey Billy were you at the game tonight? Did you get to catch up with anyone else from the forum? Anybody else able to vouch for you as a person?
Maybe I’ll see you at the grand final? Happy to shout you beers all night, pal
-
- Laurie Daley
- Posts: 12655
- Joined: April 29, 2017, 7:22 pm
- Favourite Player: Ashley Gilbert
- zim
- Laurie Daley
- Posts: 10693
- Joined: July 8, 2015, 3:38 pm
- Favourite Player: NRL: Joseph Tapine
NRLW: Grace Kemp - Location: Sydney
Re: Hudson Young suspended for eight weeks
So do trials and world club challenge count for this?
8 Week suspension
1) Finals Week 1 v Melbourne
2) Finals Week 3 v Souths
3) Grand Final v Roosters
4) World club challenge ?
5) Trial 1
6) Trial 2
7) Round 1 2020
8) Round 2 2020
Returns round 3.
8 Week suspension
1) Finals Week 1 v Melbourne
2) Finals Week 3 v Souths
3) Grand Final v Roosters
4) World club challenge ?
5) Trial 1
6) Trial 2
7) Round 1 2020
8) Round 2 2020
Returns round 3.
Re: Hudson Young suspended for eight weeks
I have vague memories that you can only use 1 trial game to count for suspensions?
I know that was the rule many years ago, may have changed though.
So week 3 or 4 depending on that.
I know that was the rule many years ago, may have changed though.
So week 3 or 4 depending on that.
-
- Mal Meninga
- Posts: 51208
- Joined: June 25, 2012, 9:53 am
- Favourite Player: Hodgo
- Location: Rockhampton, Central Queensland
Re: Hudson Young suspended for eight weeks
I remember buying you some quality craft beer for lunch, then you driving your car into a cement barrier.
Sent from my SM-G975F using The Greenhouse mobile app powered by Tapatalk
Son, we live in a world that has forums, and those forums have to be guarded by Mods. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Nickman? I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. You weep for Lucy, and you curse GE. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know -- that GE’s moderation, while tragic, probably saved lives; and my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, keeps threads on track and under the appropriately sized, highlighted green headings.
You want moderation because deep down in places you don't talk about at parties, you want me on that forum -- you need me on that forum. We use words like "stay on topic," "use the appropriate forum," "please delete." We use these words as the backbone of a life spent defending something. You use them as a punch line. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very moderation that I provide and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather that you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest you get a green handle and edit a post. Either way, I don't give a DAMN what you think about moderation.
-
- Mal Meninga
- Posts: 51208
- Joined: June 25, 2012, 9:53 am
- Favourite Player: Hodgo
- Location: Rockhampton, Central Queensland
Re: Hudson Young suspended for eight weeks
Exactly. So now we're even.T_R wrote: ↑October 1, 2019, 4:48 pmI remember buying you some quality craft beer for lunch, then you driving your car into a cement barrier.
Sent from my SM-G975F using The Greenhouse mobile app powered by Tapatalk
Re: Hudson Young suspended for eight weeks
‘Can’t sleep at night’: Canberra Raiders rookie Hudson Young opens up on eye gouge ban
It will be a long NRL off-season for Canberra thinking about what could have been in 2019, but nobody will be working harder than suspended youngster Hudson Young. He was the forgotten man in the grand final last Sunday.
“Missing the games during the season then doing it again, you sit at home and you can’t sleep at night and you’re just thinking what if I didn’t do it,” Young said.
Read more: https://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-pr ... 9ed67d917e
It will be a long NRL off-season for Canberra thinking about what could have been in 2019, but nobody will be working harder than suspended youngster Hudson Young. He was the forgotten man in the grand final last Sunday.
“Missing the games during the season then doing it again, you sit at home and you can’t sleep at night and you’re just thinking what if I didn’t do it,” Young said.
Read more: https://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-pr ... 9ed67d917e
- -PJ-
- Mal Meninga
- Posts: 24836
- Joined: May 8, 2010, 1:58 pm
- Favourite Player: Josh Papalii
- Location: 416.9 km from GIO Stadium
Re: Hudson Young suspended for eight weeks
At least you have your vision...pelican !
3rd Battalion Royal Australian Regiment..Old Faithful
#emptythetank
#emptythetank
-
- Laurie Daley
- Posts: 12655
- Joined: April 29, 2017, 7:22 pm
- Favourite Player: Ashley Gilbert
Re: Hudson Young suspended for eight weeks
Interesting language he used there. Words to the effect I did it then I did it again... hmm
Hope the lad bounces back but he’s an interesting one it seems
Hope the lad bounces back but he’s an interesting one it seems
-
- John Ferguson
- Posts: 2480
- Joined: July 5, 2008, 6:35 pm
- Favourite Player: Savage, Timoko, Strange, Tapine, Rapana
- Location: Western NSW
Re: Hudson Young suspended for eight weeks
If he does it again after all the club and players have rallied behind him, I want him shot out of a cannon. Don't give a **** where he lands.
Hopefully he pulls his head in. It's not part of the game, never has been.
Sent from my SM-J530Y using The Greenhouse mobile app powered by Tapatalk
Hopefully he pulls his head in. It's not part of the game, never has been.
Sent from my SM-J530Y using The Greenhouse mobile app powered by Tapatalk