2020 centre and wingers

[Billy Walker]

I suspect you are probably correct but I find that graphic very interesting. Speaks volumes for team chemistry. No doubt why boozy bonding sessions were such a part of Origin preparation in the past. I recall in 2016 the raiders golden run coincided with Ricky putting them in a hotel together before big home games. Blake Austin is clearly a good player given recent performance but I get the sense he may not have been the best for team chemistry last year (pure speculation and observation). It’s the element that makes threads like this impossible from the outside- you can make the best logical argument in the world why it makes sense that Simo take over from Raps but without insight around the impact either players has on team culture and chemistry we are picking sides based on half a story.

[The Nickman]

Haha I genuinely don’t think that’s a very good correlation on that graph if you take the Storm out of it, who would be good no matter how many players they’ve turned over

In my line of work, that sort of regression is what I call a “splattergram”

Would be surprised if it has an r-squared of higher than 0.70

[Billy Walker]

Haha I genuinely don’t think that’s a very good correlation on that graph if you take the Storm out of it, who would be good no matter how many players they’ve turned over

In my line of work, that sort of regression is what I call a “splattergram”

Would be surprised if it has an r-squared of higher than 0.70

That gives me a little tingle when you talk technical like that Nickman...

[The Nickman]

Haha I genuinely don’t think that’s a very good correlation on that graph if you take the Storm out of it, who would be good no matter how many players they’ve turned over

In my line of work, that sort of regression is what I call a “splattergram”

Would be surprised if it has an r-squared of higher than 0.70

That gives me a little tingle when you talk technical like that Nickman...

You weren’t the only one with a tingle!

[Coastalraider]

Haha I genuinely don’t think that’s a very good correlation on that graph if you take the Storm out of it, who would be good no matter how many players they’ve turned over

In my line of work, that sort of regression is what I call a “splattergram”

Would be surprised if it has an r-squared of higher than 0.70

Wait - you work???? I ad presumed you were on here all day and being funded by Centrelink money using multiple fake names??

[gangrenous]

Nah the Robodebt data matching was clever enough to work out Nickman and pigman we’re both Lucy. Had to get a job.

[The Nickman]

I post in between haircuts, *****

[gerg]

I post in between haircuts, ****

Nickman to barber... 'I'd like a haircut please, just the one'

Sent from my SM-G570F using Tapatalk

[Coastalraider]

I post in between haircuts, ****

Nickman to barber... 'I'd like a haircut please, just the one'

Sent from my SM-G570F using Tapatalk

Barber to Nickman ‘i hate to be the bearer of bad news, but that hair hasn’t grown for years.’