2019 Rd 2 V Storm: Game Day
Moderator: GH Moderators
Re: 2019 Rd 2 V Storm: Game Day
Chip and chases are very hard to execute and extremley low percentage
The strongly likelihood is a turn over
If I’m a coach and my defensive line is forcing teams to consider options like that, I’m not toning that down, I’m ramping it up. I want them making more low % plays
The strongly likelihood is a turn over
If I’m a coach and my defensive line is forcing teams to consider options like that, I’m not toning that down, I’m ramping it up. I want them making more low % plays
Re: 2019 Rd 2 V Storm: Game Day
EDIT Hodgson takes some VERY poor options for a player of his quality. His kicks near the line are rarely on, and neither are the crash balls or slow run-arounds...zilhouse wrote: ↑March 23, 2019, 5:11 pmI disagree with the bottom line man. A team with a guy like hodgson isnt low IQ. If your team is doing 4 one out hit ups they are doing it because they are coached to do that.Rickmando wrote: ↑March 23, 2019, 1:51 pmI’d agree that our attacking structure has been sorely lacking for a long time. Even a massive Rick-head like me can see that.gergreg wrote: ↑March 23, 2019, 11:22 amFor the first 40/50 odd minutes our strategy was one out forward hitups for 4 tackles which allowed us to be completely dominated in the ruck, which meant we weren't making any ground and weren't countering the wrestle. Because of this their wingers were dropping back on the fourth meaning there was not much open space to kick. We could have tried a few shorter kicks behind the line. We didn't have enough bodies in motion to stop our forwards from being monstered in gang tackles. This is something I believe Crawley would have rectified.-TW- wrote:Bit hard to chase them when they shell them down the back 3s throat all night
Didn't know we had Josh McCrone for a cameo appearance
We have no plays, no structured play, it's like they just toss it around and wait for something to open up. This doesnt work against the top teams with good defence. You need structured plays to create gaps.
We were outcoached.
Sent from my SM-G570F using Tapatalk
But I’d also argue that our “improvised” attack leaves something to be desired. I love Jordy Raps and to a lesser extent BJ, but when those guys go to dummy half they run it 100% of the time. There’s no thought to pass it occasionally just to keep defences guessing/honest. Kicking is the same. What about the occasional chip over the top to put doubt in a fullbacks mind?
It seems as though we have blokes who are trying to follow a structured, rigid plan of attacking - but either they aren’t executing it very well, or the plan isn’t very good.
Bottom line - we have a lot of players in this team with low football IQ
Its not always a bad strategy but at NRL level it generally is. There are a few ways that can work i.e. if you have a team full of big boppers who are hard to handle and get quick play the balls, or if youre playing a team in the wet who drop lots of footy i.e. titans. Doing that verses the storm is just asking for a pounding. They can get numbers into the tackles and slow it down so you lose any momentum. The way to beat the storm is through offloads, getting one on one tackles when you have the ball and complete at a high %.
The 2016 attack wasnt rigid. Our attack started to get rigid the last few games into 2018. Whoever is coaching attack at the moment is banking on playing under 15 level footy for the rest of the year.
-
- John Ferguson
- Posts: 2383
- Joined: March 31, 2018, 9:30 pm
Aidan Sezer
I just don’t understand why we don’t just have Williams defend on the wing now. We know he struggles defensively so stick him out wide and bring everyone in 1 position
Sent from my iPhone using The Greenhouse
Sent from my iPhone using The Greenhouse
Re: 2019 Rd 2 V Storm: Game Day
Chip and chase was just a spit balled example.PigRickman wrote: ↑March 23, 2019, 6:07 pm Chip and chases are very hard to execute and extremley low percentage
The strongly likelihood is a turn over
If I’m a coach and my defensive line is forcing teams to consider options like that, I’m not toning that down, I’m ramping it up. I want them making more low % plays
I’ve got no doubt the modern day HC discourages this play, it is low percentage, but our players have to be willing to break the mould on occasions to mix up what we throw at the opposition - surely you’d agree our halves in particular are very ordinary at doing that?
-
- Laurie Daley
- Posts: 13407
- Joined: February 26, 2010, 6:01 pm
- Favourite Player: Brett Mullins
- Location: Canberra :(
Re: Aidan Sezer
Williams defence isn't that bad, it's not bad enough to justify keeping Sezer if Sezer doesn't improve significantly this week.
Re: Aidan Sezer
I think that's a philosophical coaching decision. Some coaches are willing to do this kind of thing, we've seen a lot of bad defensive halves do this but i've never paid close enough attention to have an opinion on it's effectiveness.LastRaider wrote: ↑March 23, 2019, 6:13 pm I just don’t understand why we don’t just have Williams defend on the wing now. We know he struggles defensively so stick him out wide and bring everyone in 1 position
Sent from my iPhone using The Greenhouse
But what i have noticed is it very much appears some coaches are just fundamentally opposed to it. If i had to guess, they would say, now i've got a half defending as a winger, i've got winger defending as a centre, and a centre as a halfback. We've weakened 3 positions and improved none. I can see that side of it, but yeah if Williams is brought in, Stuart might have to adjust his approach and find ways to hide him.
My Chris Anderson 1 marker policy insane idea has always been defend the weak man in the middle at hooker. He's tackling bigger guys but it's much harder to isolate him, you're not dealing with defending in space much, and use the additional speed to maybe help drive line speed. For us specifically, if Stuart turned to Williams, that's what i want him to do and i'd move John Bateman out wide into Sam's position defensively.
We lost 5-7 games last year pretty much solely through poor defence in that other halves spot. It's why Wighton is where he is. The lengths teams go to, in order to attack him in the red zone suggests the rest of the league does not share your opinion on it not being that bad.Green eyed Mick wrote: ↑March 23, 2019, 6:34 pm Williams defence isn't that bad, it's not bad enough to justify keeping Sezer if Sezer doesn't improve significantly this week.
-
- Mal Meninga
- Posts: 51011
- Joined: June 25, 2012, 9:53 am
- Favourite Player: Hodgo
- Location: Rockhampton, Central Queensland
Re: Aidan Sezer
This is a very good point. Our attack is just fine, it’s our defence that needed improvement this season, I think we all agree on that.PigRickman wrote:We might be marginally better in attack, but we’d be significantly worse in defence
The game is played on both sides and unfortunately both options leave us exposed on one side.
I’ve watched enough footy and enough of this raiders team to say we’ve got the strike power to score points despite Sezer’s limitations
I’ve seen nothing to suggest we can stand up defensively with a player of Williams limitations
For me, it’s as simple as that. If we have to pick a poison here, defence wins more in this league more than offence
We’ve been the best attacking side in the league over the last 2 years and haven’t sniffed the play offs
Let’s hooe the pommy Williams can give us a little of both.
Against the Storm it was actually our attack that let us down, we coughed the ball up in really good field position on SO many occasions, and Sezer wasn’t Robinson Crusoe in that regard.
If we defend like we did against the Storm when we play the Knights, and improve our handling in the red zone, we will beat the Knights.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
-
- Mal Meninga
- Posts: 51011
- Joined: June 25, 2012, 9:53 am
- Favourite Player: Hodgo
- Location: Rockhampton, Central Queensland
Re: 2019 Rd 2 V Storm: Game Day
What I’m glad about is that in the light of day, the majority of articles I’ve read about the team and the game are very positive, which is the same way as I saw the result.
It’s good to see that not everybody shares the same doom and gloom it’s the end of the world thinking as some on this forum.
We’ll be better for this result.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
It’s good to see that not everybody shares the same doom and gloom it’s the end of the world thinking as some on this forum.
We’ll be better for this result.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
- KingDynamite
- Chris O'Sullivan
- Posts: 946
- Joined: May 17, 2012, 9:41 pm
- Favourite Player: Jordan Rapana
Re: Aidan Sezer
I cannot understand the calls for Hingano. I haven’t seen anything from him that says he’s more deserving that Sezer nor that he would do a better job.
Neither Hingano or Williams are in the same conversation as Sezer when it comes to defence. That’s enough for him to stay in 1sts
Neither Hingano or Williams are in the same conversation as Sezer when it comes to defence. That’s enough for him to stay in 1sts
- RTW
- David Furner
- Posts: 3762
- Joined: July 29, 2008, 7:05 pm
- Favourite Player: Laurie Daley
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Aidan Sezer
Defensively each position has a different role and depending where you are on the field that role changes again. Simply moving your half to the wing does not automatically fix things as they need to learn how to defend all over again. Good wingers instinctively know when to jam and when to stay out they also have an understanding of what the centre inside them will do.
As for moving into the middle you are tripling their workload. In my opinion Williams decision making is great at reserve grace speed but poor at first grade. If you add fatigue I think he would struggle further.
I think you need an old fashioned bodyguard of a second rower. In order to do that your edge man would need to play wider and be able to cover more ground laterally. Bateman May actually be the best player suited to this role in our team but by moving him you lose other advantages ehh having Tapine running at a half.
Sent from my iPhone using The Greenhouse mobile app powered by Tapatalk
As for moving into the middle you are tripling their workload. In my opinion Williams decision making is great at reserve grace speed but poor at first grade. If you add fatigue I think he would struggle further.
I think you need an old fashioned bodyguard of a second rower. In order to do that your edge man would need to play wider and be able to cover more ground laterally. Bateman May actually be the best player suited to this role in our team but by moving him you lose other advantages ehh having Tapine running at a half.
Sent from my iPhone using The Greenhouse mobile app powered by Tapatalk
Re: 2019 Rd 2 V Storm: Game Day
It doesn't need to be a chip-and-chase, perhaps a grubber, or perhaps a boot deep (something that DCE does to us every fkn game we play against him, with decent success). Either way, something that raises a question in the defence's mind.PigRickman wrote: ↑March 23, 2019, 6:07 pm Chip and chases are very hard to execute and extremley low percentage
The strongly likelihood is a turn over
If I’m a coach and my defensive line is forcing teams to consider options like that, I’m not toning that down, I’m ramping it up. I want them making more low % plays
-
- Gerry De La Cruz
- Posts: 14
- Joined: March 23, 2019, 7:39 pm
- Favourite Player: John Bateman
Re: 2019 Rd 2 V Storm: Game Day
Watched the full game back this morning and Melbourne just seem to do the 1% better than most sides.
Few stupid individual errors really didn't help and the Storm got on the bavk of that.
Coming from a Wigan fan I honestly don't think George Williams is the answer, just take a look how were going so far this year. I've been to every game home and away so far this season and apart from his short kicking game and probably better defence I just don't think he is worth the price tag being talked about.
Few stupid individual errors really didn't help and the Storm got on the bavk of that.
Coming from a Wigan fan I honestly don't think George Williams is the answer, just take a look how were going so far this year. I've been to every game home and away so far this season and apart from his short kicking game and probably better defence I just don't think he is worth the price tag being talked about.
Re: Aidan Sezer
I think we're playing the knights at a decent time (hope I'm not jinxing it). They haven't quite clicked yet, Pearce isn't playing at the standard he did at the start of last year and they are as one dimensional in attack as us. Make Ponga do 40 tackles for the game and kick in behind Edrick and we should be a decent chance. We also need a strong start to contain Klemer.The Rickman wrote:This is a very good point. Our attack is just fine, it’s our defence that needed improvement this season, I think we all agree on that.PigRickman wrote:We might be marginally better in attack, but we’d be significantly worse in defence
The game is played on both sides and unfortunately both options leave us exposed on one side.
I’ve watched enough footy and enough of this raiders team to say we’ve got the strike power to score points despite Sezer’s limitations
I’ve seen nothing to suggest we can stand up defensively with a player of Williams limitations
For me, it’s as simple as that. If we have to pick a poison here, defence wins more in this league more than offence
We’ve been the best attacking side in the league over the last 2 years and haven’t sniffed the play offs
Let’s hooe the pommy Williams can give us a little of both.
Against the Storm it was actually our attack that let us down, we coughed the ball up in really good field position on SO many occasions, and Sezer wasn’t Robinson Crusoe in that regard.
If we defend like we did against the Storm when we play the Knights, and improve our handling in the red zone, we will beat the Knights.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G570F using Tapatalk
Shoving it in your face since 2017
- zim
- Laurie Daley
- Posts: 10639
- Joined: July 8, 2015, 3:38 pm
- Favourite Player: NRL: Joseph Tapine
NRLW: Grace Kemp - Location: Sydney
Re: 2019 Rd 2 V Storm: Game Day
CNK noticed we were short on numbers and made the decision to inject himself. Croft saw this and reacted well. It was good eyes up footy from him.Sezer's Palace wrote: ↑March 23, 2019, 4:56 pm A few thoughts:
- I've been really impressed by CNK so far but something to keep an eye on is his positioning for the Storm's second try. Not sure if it's a tactic or just a brain explosion but he did it against the Bulldogs in the trial as well and we were almost caught out. Hopefully doesn't happen again.
- I'd probably rather see someone else in for Lui. He's been ineffective carting the ball in both games and he's not a particularly strong defender. Would probably like to see Guler come in but haven't seen any of Mounties this season so not sure who's been strong there.
- I don't think Sezer was as bad as has been said. Granted, his first 20 was awful and that kick for Rapana in particular was both a bad idea/bad execution but I thought after that he was okay. Hodgson's decisions in the red zone frustrated me more so than Sezer's and I thought he did a better job of straightening/taking on the line this week. He needs to stand closer to the ruck as first receiver, at the moment he is standing so far away that it's a difficult pass to make and it's causing him to start flat footed.
- I'd like to see us utilise Whitehead better in attack. He's such a weapon with his hands/hole running/short kick chase but at the moment he's just being used for tough carries/short balls. We also need to get Leilua more early ball, going to the right seems to be an after thought at the moment.
- Rapana looked a bit underdone but it was great to have his enthusiasm back.
- Horsburgh will be great if he can get those dumb penalties out of his game. Love his aggression and offload but has to be more disciplined.
I think that's all for the moment. The Storm have been clinical to start the season and I think we were overwhelmed by their intensity and ruck control. With a 7 day turnaround I'm still very confident we'll do the Knights.
CNK just made a bad decision here, but it won't be the last time he's in the line as that's how we defend. Sometimes it'll be the right decision and he'll still get burnt.
- Northern Raider
- Mal Meninga
- Posts: 32522
- Joined: June 19, 2007, 8:17 am
- Favourite Player: Dean Lance
- Location: Greener pastures
Re: 2019 Rd 2 V Storm: Game Day
Storm were simply better than us. Our guys were a little flat off the 5 day turnaround and they made us pay. Not too concerned as it's a game most of us would have pencilled in as a loss. Next week against Knights will be a better indicator of where we're at.
* The author assumes no responsibility for the topicality, correctness, completeness or quality of information provided.
Re: Aidan Sezer
I don't see what Sezer has done to justify the support for him. In his four years with the Titans they did not make the finals. He came here in 2016 and at the back end of that season the Raiders went on a 10 game winning streak to make the finals. We've not seen that replicated. Their was some unbelievable stuff from Leipana in that streak. I am one of the biggest defensophiles on here, but the defence is helped by a good kicking game and kick chase. We don't see that consistently from Sezer. In fact I am still amazed that we kicked to Vunivalu's wing so often (at least I was until he kicked the other way and put it into the car park). The young fullback would have been a shorter less athletic target imo, but that instruction may have come from the HC.Green eyed Mick wrote: ↑March 23, 2019, 6:34 pm Williams defence isn't that bad, it's not bad enough to justify keeping Sezer if Sezer doesn't improve significantly this week.
- zim
- Laurie Daley
- Posts: 10639
- Joined: July 8, 2015, 3:38 pm
- Favourite Player: NRL: Joseph Tapine
NRLW: Grace Kemp - Location: Sydney
Re: Aidan Sezer
He has known issues under the high ball. If he wasn't our main target for bombs we're doing the wrong thing.RedRaider wrote: ↑March 23, 2019, 11:24 pmI don't see what Sezer has done to justify the support for him. In his four years with the Titans they did not make the finals. He came here in 2016 and at the back end of that season the Raiders went on a 10 game winning streak to make the finals. We've not seen that replicated. Their was some unbelievable stuff from Leipana in that streak. I am one of the biggest defensophiles on here, but the defence is helped by a good kicking game and kick chase. We don't see that consistently from Sezer. In fact I am still amazed that we kicked to Vunivalu's wing so often (at least I was until he kicked the other way and put it into the car park). The young fullback would have been a shorter less athletic target imo, but that instruction may have come from the HC.Green eyed Mick wrote: ↑March 23, 2019, 6:34 pm Williams defence isn't that bad, it's not bad enough to justify keeping Sezer if Sezer doesn't improve significantly this week.
-
- John Ferguson
- Posts: 2383
- Joined: March 31, 2018, 9:30 pm
2019 Rd 2 V Storm: Game Day
Yeah he is just so inconsistent with his kicking game all the time. I can forgive average kicking at some away games especially in North Queensland where the air is heavier etc. but on your home ground where you know the ball travels a little further he should be spot on 95% of the time and he just isn’t. Just no where near!zim wrote:He has known issues under the high ball. If he wasn't our main target for bombs we're doing the wrong thing.RedRaider wrote: ↑March 23, 2019, 11:24 pmI don't see what Sezer has done to justify the support for him. In his four years with the Titans they did not make the finals. He came here in 2016 and at the back end of that season the Raiders went on a 10 game winning streak to make the finals. We've not seen that replicated. Their was some unbelievable stuff from Leipana in that streak. I am one of the biggest defensophiles on here, but the defence is helped by a good kicking game and kick chase. We don't see that consistently from Sezer. In fact I am still amazed that we kicked to Vunivalu's wing so often (at least I was until he kicked the other way and put it into the car park). The young fullback would have been a shorter less athletic target imo, but that instruction may have come from the HC.Green eyed Mick wrote: ↑March 23, 2019, 6:34 pm Williams defence isn't that bad, it's not bad enough to justify keeping Sezer if Sezer doesn't improve significantly this week.
Sent from my iPhone using The Greenhouse
Re: 2019 Rd 2 V Storm: Game Day
Peter Sterling really picked Corey Horsburgh for some criticism on The Sunday Footy Show... it might not have been the most sensible thing... and it's probably good advice... but a bit unfair to single him out...
- Raider Azz
- Jason Croker
- Posts: 4715
- Joined: January 7, 2005, 10:22 pm
Re: 2019 Rd 2 V Storm: Game Day
Sterling has long gone senile. Was once a great mind, but seems to consistently get it wrong these days.greeneyed wrote:Peter Sterling really picked Corey Horsburgh for some criticism on The Sunday Footy Show... it might not have been the most sensible thing... and it's probably good advice... but a bit unfair to single him out...
I was done with him when he dedicated an entire article to telling BJ off for sledging when he scored the winning try against the Bulldogs when the Morris twins had been giving it worse to BJ all game.
Hopefully Corey pays no attention, and I'm sure Ricky and the senior players will tell him the same.
Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
Re: 2019 Rd 2 V Storm: Game Day
Don’t watch channel 9 and stunned by anyone who does
But let’s not pretend Horsburgh is a finished product above constructive criticism
If that’s what Sterling was delivering, fair enough.
We all like this kid and see a bright future but there no question he had a VERY poor game on the weekend
But let’s not pretend Horsburgh is a finished product above constructive criticism
If that’s what Sterling was delivering, fair enough.
We all like this kid and see a bright future but there no question he had a VERY poor game on the weekend
- -PJ-
- Mal Meninga
- Posts: 24719
- Joined: May 8, 2010, 1:58 pm
- Favourite Player: Josh Papalii
- Location: 416.9 km from GIO Stadium
Re: 2019 Rd 2 V Storm: Game Day
He's a diamond that needs polishing.
I'm sure he's working hard on fixing up a few errors hes been making, he'll be fine.
I'm loving the effort though, fantastic technique in defence.
I'm sure he's working hard on fixing up a few errors hes been making, he'll be fine.
I'm loving the effort though, fantastic technique in defence.
3rd Battalion Royal Australian Regiment..Old Faithful
#emptythetank
#emptythetank
Re: Aidan Sezer
He didn't seem to have too many problems against us Zim. The two I remember were: one from Sezer about the middle of the first half which he took easily and then one from Jack early in the second half which he again took easily. We have a large body who can jump high in Jack. Why wouldn't we put the ball up to the shorter fullback Hughes and have Jack challenge for the ball? If Vunivalu has had problems in the past I image the meticulous Bellamy would have worked with him to correct it.zim wrote: ↑March 23, 2019, 11:44 pmHe has known issues under the high ball. If he wasn't our main target for bombs we're doing the wrong thing.RedRaider wrote: ↑March 23, 2019, 11:24 pmI don't see what Sezer has done to justify the support for him. In his four years with the Titans they did not make the finals. He came here in 2016 and at the back end of that season the Raiders went on a 10 game winning streak to make the finals. We've not seen that replicated. Their was some unbelievable stuff from Leipana in that streak. I am one of the biggest defensophiles on here, but the defence is helped by a good kicking game and kick chase. We don't see that consistently from Sezer. In fact I am still amazed that we kicked to Vunivalu's wing so often (at least I was until he kicked the other way and put it into the car park). The young fullback would have been a shorter less athletic target imo, but that instruction may have come from the HC.Green eyed Mick wrote: ↑March 23, 2019, 6:34 pm Williams defence isn't that bad, it's not bad enough to justify keeping Sezer if Sezer doesn't improve significantly this week.
- gangrenous
- Laurie Daley
- Posts: 16586
- Joined: May 12, 2007, 10:42 pm
Re: 2019 Rd 2 V Storm: Game Day
Hmmm... if they share your attitude then no wonder we don’t learn from mistakes.Raider Azz wrote: Hopefully Corey pays no attention, and I'm sure Ricky and the senior players will tell him the same.
He had a shocker. He should be very focussed on fixing it if he likes playing first grade.
Re: 2019 Rd 2 V Storm: Game Day
The Sunday Footy Show is a pretty good show. I always watch Fox League in preference to Nine... but Fox League can be pretty boof head like these days themselves. Matty Johns, Fletch and Hindy, the "Professor"... they're all the biggest boof heads of rugby league magazine shows. Nine seems to have lost Beau Ryan (?) but they have brought in Sam Thaiday... so they are putting up a big challenge to reclaim the title for the biggest boof head in rugby league television today.PigRickman wrote: ↑March 24, 2019, 12:17 pm Don’t watch channel 9 and stunned by anyone who does
But let’s not pretend Horsburgh is a finished product above constructive criticism
If that’s what Sterling was delivering, fair enough.
We all like this kid and see a bright future but there no question he had a VERY poor game on the weekend
What Sterling highlighted was the Storm losing the ball... and Horsburgh actually ran in to give the Storm player a head/hair rub. And it caused a scrap. Not the best thing to do... and best not to repeat it... but given the show devoted five minutes to each game and spent a good minute of it on this issue in our case... it was a bit unfair. There was a lot of actual footy advice Sterling could have given the Raiders if he'd chosen to be analytical. It was an "easy" thing to highlight, and probably the least of our problems in that game.
- -PJ-
- Mal Meninga
- Posts: 24719
- Joined: May 8, 2010, 1:58 pm
- Favourite Player: Josh Papalii
- Location: 416.9 km from GIO Stadium
Re: 2019 Rd 2 V Storm: Game Day
I'm sorry..
But what the official crowd at GIO on Friday ?
I missed it !!
Cheers in advance.
But what the official crowd at GIO on Friday ?
I missed it !!
Cheers in advance.
3rd Battalion Royal Australian Regiment..Old Faithful
#emptythetank
#emptythetank
Re: 2019 Rd 2 V Storm: Game Day
Yep agree as well. He looks promising.
The sooner he can become calm and calculated on the footy field the better player he will be.
Controlled aggro is a must for fiery League players in the current way the game is played.
- -PJ-
- Mal Meninga
- Posts: 24719
- Joined: May 8, 2010, 1:58 pm
- Favourite Player: Josh Papalii
- Location: 416.9 km from GIO Stadium
Re: 2019 Rd 2 V Storm: Game Day
Thanks GE.
14k is pretty decent. Let's hope for even more next Friday.
3rd Battalion Royal Australian Regiment..Old Faithful
#emptythetank
#emptythetank
Re: 2019 Rd 2 V Storm: Game Day
Yep was a really good solid crowd.
-
- Jason Croker
- Posts: 4908
- Joined: July 26, 2015, 8:24 pm
- Favourite Player: Croker, Cotric, Sezer
- Location: The Land of Lime Green
Re: 2019 Rd 2 V Storm: Game Day
14 something. Which, for the timeslot and the way the weather was forecast, was actually really good, I thought.
And to all the people who doubted me, hello to them as well. - Mark Webber, Raiders Ballboy and Unluckiest F1 Driver Ever
I'm attacking in the right way, instead of just...attacking in the general direction. - Max Aaron (also eerily apropos for the Green Machine)
I'm attacking in the right way, instead of just...attacking in the general direction. - Max Aaron (also eerily apropos for the Green Machine)
- Brew
- Steve Walters
- Posts: 7183
- Joined: June 4, 2005, 11:35 am
- Favourite Player: Blake Austin
- Location: Bondi Junction
Re: 2019 Rd 2 V Storm: Game Day
Does anyone know why the captain (or captains) are no longer part of the press conferences after the game anymore?
Sent from my iPhone using The Greenhouse
Sent from my iPhone using The Greenhouse
In Ricky We Trust