2019 Rd 2 V Storm: Game Day

All the news on the Canberra Raiders NRL team, all in one place

Moderator: GH Moderators

Who will win?

Raiders 13+
1
6%
Raiders 1-12
9
56%
Draw
0
No votes
Storm 1-12
4
25%
Storm 13+
2
13%
 
Total votes: 16

raiderskater
Jason Croker
Posts: 4923
Joined: July 26, 2015, 8:24 pm
Favourite Player: Croker, Cotric, Sezer
Location: The Land of Lime Green

Re: 2019 Rd 2 V Storm: Game Day

Post by raiderskater »

Sezer did have a pretty ordinary game, but I still think we do him a massive disservice by giving him some absolutely trash-garbage passes. Of course your kicks aren't going to be great when you get a dodgy pass half a second before you get flattened by the opposition. I thought we got better at that late in the second half and surprise surprise, Sezer's kick accuracy improved.

Also - one of the things I was so happy about last week totally disappeared last night - CHASE THE ****ING KICKS. There's no point in Sezer or Wighton or whoever putting in a big booming kick when none of our guys are there to put the pressure on!
And to all the people who doubted me, hello to them as well. - Mark Webber, Raiders Ballboy and Unluckiest F1 Driver Ever

I'm attacking in the right way, instead of just...attacking in the general direction. - Max Aaron (also eerily apropos for the Green Machine)
User avatar
yurithe1
David Furner
Posts: 3587
Joined: March 16, 2008, 10:27 am
Favourite Player: Jordan Rapana
Location: Canberra

Re: Aidan Sezer

Post by yurithe1 »

The Rickman wrote: March 22, 2019, 8:01 pm I wouldn’t be against him being dropped IF he had a bad game against the Knights and IF Williams is tearing it up in Mounties

BUT I’m quietly confident he’ll turn it around next week


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Mounties are playing against Newtown today. Game is being televised by Foxsports. We'll get a good idea of how he's travelling.

I have to admit I'd forgotten about Hingano. I didn't think he was very good last year, but I have to temper that with the fact that Ricky was misusing him at hooker.
Some people talk about the weather. Others do something about it.

MEMBER NO.: 4500 (before they changed the numbering system).
User avatar
-TW-
Mal Meninga
Posts: 35427
Joined: July 2, 2007, 11:41 am

Re: 2019 Rd 2 V Storm: Game Day

Post by -TW- »

Bit hard to chase them when they shell them down the back 3s throat all night

Didn't know we had Josh McCrone for a cameo appearance
User avatar
Brew
Steve Walters
Posts: 7183
Joined: June 4, 2005, 11:35 am
Favourite Player: Blake Austin
Location: Bondi Junction

Re: Aidan Sezer

Post by Brew »

Green Chapel wrote:Watching with a mate .... and we couldnt even work out whether he was nsw or qld ???

That says it all.
Does it really matter, he will never ever play Origin.


Sent from my iPhone using The Greenhouse
In Ricky We Trust
Wiki Special
Brett Mullins
Posts: 1544
Joined: August 11, 2016, 8:16 am
Favourite Player: Ruben Wiki

Re: 2019 Rd 2 V Storm: Game Day

Post by Wiki Special »

I thought we could take the scoreline as a positive. Last year it probably gets ugly in that 2nd half with a quality team like Melbourne putting 40 on us. The desire is evident this year, we are just not there yet against the top sides. The Storm won the wrestle in both attack and defence. We have to do a better job in this area. Our teams attack needs quick play the balls for the likes of Rapana, Leilua, Cotric, etc. to shine. And in defence our line speed would improve if we aren't starting each play on the back foot because we can't slow down the opposition. I hate the wrestle in the game but it isn't going anywhere it would seem so we need to be better.

I am very happy with the likes of Horsburgh, J. Bateman and CNK so far. All extremely willing.

I really like our back 3 as individual players but I do honestly think all 3 are better wingers than fullbacks.
User avatar
-PJ-
Mal Meninga
Posts: 24827
Joined: May 8, 2010, 1:58 pm
Favourite Player: Josh Papalii
Location: 416.9 km from GIO Stadium

Re: 2019 Rd 2 V Storm: Game Day

Post by -PJ- »

Ok guys, garage door is up...
3rd Battalion Royal Australian Regiment..Old Faithful
#emptythetank :shock:
User avatar
Botman
Mal Meninga
Posts: 42200
Joined: June 18, 2013, 4:31 pm
Favourite Player: Elliott Whitehead

Re: Aidan Sezer

Post by Botman »

Shouts to the green chapel though!

He and his mate didn’t remember Sezer’s played for city, was a highly touted bulldogs junior, and they can’t use google... it really does say it all!
User avatar
simo
Ricky Stuart
Posts: 9583
Joined: March 12, 2013, 7:50 pm
Favourite Player: Keghead

Re: Aidan Sezer

Post by simo »

Imagine how many halfa would be sacked if their performance against the storm was the only criteria used
Dont delete this GE
Neeeegz
John Ferguson
Posts: 2474
Joined: July 5, 2008, 6:35 pm
Favourite Player: Savage, Timoko, Strange, Tapine, Rapana
Location: Western NSW

Re: Aidan Sezer

Post by Neeeegz »

greeneyed wrote:
Neeeegz wrote: March 22, 2019, 6:57 pm Hingano in for sezer, I'd think him and Jack would go well together

Sent from my SM-J530Y using The Greenhouse mobile app powered by Tapatalk
I've seen no evidence that Hingano is a regular first grader, he's a depth half.
Yeah because Ricky plays him on the wing

Sent from my SM-J530Y using The Greenhouse mobile app powered by Tapatalk

Hazza
Chris O'Sullivan
Posts: 971
Joined: March 1, 2016, 3:14 pm
Favourite Player: Adam Clydesdale

Re: Aidan Sezer

Post by Hazza »

simo wrote: March 23, 2019, 10:28 am Imagine how many halfa would be sacked if their performance against the storm was the only criteria used
haha yeah cos Sezer has only ever had an ordinary game v the storm. Gee I would've thought people are basing it on 3 seasons of mediocrity, not 1 game v the storm.
User avatar
roneel78
Brett Mullins
Posts: 1366
Joined: June 28, 2010, 9:23 pm
Favourite Player: Campese

Re: Aidan Sezer

Post by roneel78 »

PigRickman wrote:Shouts to the green chapel though!

He and his mate didn’t remember Sezer’s played for city, was a highly touted bulldogs junior, and they can’t use google... it really does say it all!
ImageImageImageImageImage


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
KingDynamite
Chris O'Sullivan
Posts: 948
Joined: May 17, 2012, 9:41 pm
Favourite Player: Jordan Rapana

Re: 2019 Rd 2 V Storm: Game Day

Post by KingDynamite »

I’m sorry but did he just spell it “acturally”
User avatar
gerg
Laurie Daley
Posts: 12697
Joined: June 24, 2008, 4:22 pm

Re: 2019 Rd 2 V Storm: Game Day

Post by gerg »

-TW- wrote:Bit hard to chase them when they shell them down the back 3s throat all night

Didn't know we had Josh McCrone for a cameo appearance
For the first 40/50 odd minutes our strategy was one out forward hitups for 4 tackles which allowed us to be completely dominated in the ruck, which meant we weren't making any ground and weren't countering the wrestle. Because of this their wingers were dropping back on the fourth meaning there was not much open space to kick. We could have tried a few shorter kicks behind the line. We didn't have enough bodies in motion to stop our forwards from being monstered in gang tackles. This is something I believe Crawley would have rectified.

We have no plays, no structured play, it's like they just toss it around and wait for something to open up. This doesnt work against the top teams with good defence. You need structured plays to create gaps.

We were outcoached.

Sent from my SM-G570F using Tapatalk

Shoving it in your face since 2017
User avatar
Brew
Steve Walters
Posts: 7183
Joined: June 4, 2005, 11:35 am
Favourite Player: Blake Austin
Location: Bondi Junction

Re: 2019 Rd 2 V Storm: Game Day

Post by Brew »

Another year another loss to Melbourne. They just do everything better than us.

I pray for the day the worlds align and we get Bellamy to coach us.

Sezer has been in the top grade for what 7 years? Croft hardly a world beater has had 2 seasons in the NRL and he looks better than Sezer.
I was a Sezer fan but becoming increasingly frustrated with him.


Sent from my iPhone using The Greenhouse
In Ricky We Trust
User avatar
zim
Laurie Daley
Posts: 10687
Joined: July 8, 2015, 3:38 pm
Favourite Player: NRL: Joseph Tapine
NRLW: Grace Kemp
Location: Sydney

Re: 2019 Rd 2 V Storm: Game Day

Post by zim »

edwahu wrote: March 23, 2019, 7:43 am Horsburgh just needs to improve his discipline before he gets a reputation with the refs, otherwise he is what we need in the side. I'd put his effort way ahead of Lui's even with the penalties.
Yeah for me Horsburgh negatives just amount to a rookie learning where to draw the line. He would have been given some instructions that he took too literally.
LastRaider
John Ferguson
Posts: 2383
Joined: March 31, 2018, 9:30 pm

Re: Aidan Sezer

Post by LastRaider »

Hazza wrote:
simo wrote: March 23, 2019, 10:28 am Imagine how many halfa would be sacked if their performance against the storm was the only criteria used
haha yeah cos Sezer has only ever had an ordinary game v the storm. Gee I would've thought people are basing it on 3 seasons of mediocrity, not 1 game v the storm.
Agree, 3 seasons with no improvement at all.


Sent from my iPhone using The Greenhouse
User avatar
BadnMean
Steve Walters
Posts: 7640
Joined: May 13, 2013, 5:30 pm
Favourite Player: chicka

Re: 2019 Rd 2 V Storm: Game Day

Post by BadnMean »

gergreg wrote: March 23, 2019, 11:22 am
-TW- wrote:Bit hard to chase them when they shell them down the back 3s throat all night

Didn't know we had Josh McCrone for a cameo appearance
For the first 40/50 odd minutes our strategy was one out forward hitups for 4 tackles which allowed us to be completely dominated in the ruck, which meant we weren't making any ground and weren't countering the wrestle. Because of this their wingers were dropping back on the fourth meaning there was not much open space to kick. We could have tried a few shorter kicks behind the line. We didn't have enough bodies in motion to stop our forwards from being monstered in gang tackles. This is something I believe Crawley would have rectified.

We have no plays, no structured play, it's like they just toss it around and wait for something to open up. This doesnt work against the top teams with good defence. You need structured plays to create gaps.

We were outcoached.

Sent from my SM-G570F using Tapatalk
There's no question Storm are the best coached team in the league, across all (or most) departments.

We see the same thing every time we play them- we just look like we are being squeezed to death by a python and can't get out. Once the air cuts out, we panic and start to make mistakes and Storm pounce.

The way to play them isn't to outboring Storm them- they are the best at that. You need to hold your nerve in attack and not actually try anything that doesn't work for you normally. Just accept that it takes longer to break a good team down and what gets through most teams on most occasions will take a few extra goes to work vs Melbourne. Instead we panic and drop balls pushing passes down there when it's not on and kick early and out on the full. Panic.

A strong minded team looks at them and doesn't blink and just does it again. A less confident team (us) blinks and panics and throws the game at them with silly errors.


In defence you need to be uber aggressive - cheat to get off your line- keep doing it so you can defend the penalties and the refs will get sick of cluing the 2m ones and just call the biggies. Then you can smash them and push the wrestle as dominant tackler. Like the Rooters did in the GF. Admittedly you different reffing in a GF but we had a 20 min period where we did this and we were in the game. They will out wrestle you by half a second in every ruck and choke your game that way unless you do something like this imo.
Only other weapon against that is for freaks like Rapana and Joey to keep making breaks/half breaks and get such a roll the wrestling looks bad because we are rolling and have the momentum. But you can't have career best years every year.

Storm outplay everyone because they do everything 90% well and have such belief that they don't panic if faced with real resistance. They have the mental strength to know it works so just keep doing it, the know it will work eventually and seeing other teams lose by just panicking away from their own game... well they feed off that.
User avatar
Seiffert82
Mal Meninga
Posts: 28095
Joined: March 17, 2007, 12:24 pm
Favourite Player: Bay56

Re: 2019 Rd 2 V Storm: Game Day

Post by Seiffert82 »

edwahu wrote: March 23, 2019, 7:10 am The key stat would have to be metres conceeded per set.

Raiders 45m, Storm 35.

The Storm had the best number this season and have a +10 advantage for 2 weeks.
Funnily enough I was just thinking the difference was about 10 m per set.

The Storm forwards are like a machine with Smith. Hitting the advantage line flat and hard on every hitup. Our forwards often seemed to be receing the ball a metre or so behind the ruck, and certainly not at full pace. Not surprising with a new front row.

In defence, Melbourne's linespeed was easily 1-2 metres faster than ours. So if you're getting a 2 metre per hitup advantage the entire game, it really adds up.
User avatar
Rickmando
John Ferguson
Posts: 2818
Joined: May 22, 2017, 3:41 pm
Favourite Player: Ricky Stuart

Re: 2019 Rd 2 V Storm: Game Day

Post by Rickmando »

gergreg wrote: March 23, 2019, 11:22 am
-TW- wrote:Bit hard to chase them when they shell them down the back 3s throat all night

Didn't know we had Josh McCrone for a cameo appearance
For the first 40/50 odd minutes our strategy was one out forward hitups for 4 tackles which allowed us to be completely dominated in the ruck, which meant we weren't making any ground and weren't countering the wrestle. Because of this their wingers were dropping back on the fourth meaning there was not much open space to kick. We could have tried a few shorter kicks behind the line. We didn't have enough bodies in motion to stop our forwards from being monstered in gang tackles. This is something I believe Crawley would have rectified.

We have no plays, no structured play, it's like they just toss it around and wait for something to open up. This doesnt work against the top teams with good defence. You need structured plays to create gaps.

We were outcoached.

Sent from my SM-G570F using Tapatalk
I’d agree that our attacking structure has been sorely lacking for a long time. Even a massive Rick-head like me can see that.

But I’d also argue that our “improvised” attack leaves something to be desired. I love Jordy Raps and to a lesser extent BJ, but when those guys go to dummy half they run it 100% of the time. There’s no thought to pass it occasionally just to keep defences guessing/honest. Kicking is the same. What about the occasional chip over the top to put doubt in a fullbacks mind?

It seems as though we have blokes who are trying to follow a structured, rigid plan of attacking - but either they aren’t executing it very well, or the plan isn’t very good.

Bottom line - we have a lot of players in this team with low football IQ
User avatar
gangrenous
Laurie Daley
Posts: 16703
Joined: May 12, 2007, 10:42 pm

Re: 2019 Rd 2 V Storm: Game Day

Post by gangrenous »

The plan is fine, it works well against a lot of teams.

The problem is there is no plan B. No adapting to game circumstances. So no beating the Storm.

As you say there needed to be some passing or support runners for the dummy half. Melbourne shut that down and we kept to it. Stupid.
Green Chapel

Re: Aidan Sezer

Post by Green Chapel »

PigRickman wrote: March 23, 2019, 10:24 am Shouts to the green chapel though!

He and his mate didn’t remember Sezer’s played for city, was a highly touted bulldogs junior, and they can’t use google... it really does say it all!
Hey mate ... the point was , most good players you know what state they are from !!
Because they get talked about for origin

Get it piggy ??

You know what i mean ?

Too busy trying to put me down ae pal !!

And you missed the point ...
Green Chapel

Re: Aidan Sezer

Post by Green Chapel »

Maybe miss piggy can figure it out for ya !!
User avatar
Gazman
Gerry De La Cruz
Posts: 24
Joined: January 22, 2019, 4:21 pm
Favourite Player: Laurie Daley

Re: 2019 Rd 2 V Storm: Game Day

Post by Gazman »

BadnMean wrote:
gergreg wrote: March 23, 2019, 11:22 am
-TW- wrote:Bit hard to chase them when they shell them down the back 3s throat all night

Didn't know we had Josh McCrone for a cameo appearance
For the first 40/50 odd minutes our strategy was one out forward hitups for 4 tackles which allowed us to be completely dominated in the ruck, which meant we weren't making any ground and weren't countering the wrestle. Because of this their wingers were dropping back on the fourth meaning there was not much open space to kick. We could have tried a few shorter kicks behind the line. We didn't have enough bodies in motion to stop our forwards from being monstered in gang tackles. This is something I believe Crawley would have rectified.

We have no plays, no structured play, it's like they just toss it around and wait for something to open up. This doesnt work against the top teams with good defence. You need structured plays to create gaps.

We were outcoached.

Sent from my SM-G570F using Tapatalk
There's no question Storm are the best coached team in the league, across all (or most) departments.

We see the same thing every time we play them- we just look like we are being squeezed to death by a python and can't get out. Once the air cuts out, we panic and start to make mistakes and Storm pounce.

The way to play them isn't to outboring Storm them- they are the best at that. You need to hold your nerve in attack and not actually try anything that doesn't work for you normally. Just accept that it takes longer to break a good team down and what gets through most teams on most occasions will take a few extra goes to work vs Melbourne. Instead we panic and drop balls pushing passes down there when it's not on and kick early and out on the full. Panic.

A strong minded team looks at them and doesn't blink and just does it again. A less confident team (us) blinks and panics and throws the game at them with silly errors.


In defence you need to be uber aggressive - cheat to get off your line- keep doing it so you can defend the penalties and the refs will get sick of cluing the 2m ones and just call the biggies. Then you can smash them and push the wrestle as dominant tackler. Like the Rooters did in the GF. Admittedly you different reffing in a GF but we had a 20 min period where we did this and we were in the game. They will out wrestle you by half a second in every ruck and choke your game that way unless you do something like this imo.
Only other weapon against that is for freaks like Rapana and Joey to keep making breaks/half breaks and get such a roll the wrestling looks bad because we are rolling and have the momentum. But you can't have career best years every year.

Storm outplay everyone because they do everything 90% well and have such belief that they don't panic if faced with real resistance. They have the mental strength to know it works so just keep doing it, the know it will work eventually and seeing other teams lose by just panicking away from their own game... well they feed off that.
Great analogy’s!



Sent from my iPhone using The Greenhouse mobile app powered by Tapatalk
User avatar
greeneyed
Don Furner
Posts: 145322
Joined: January 7, 2005, 4:21 pm

Re: 2019 Rd 2 V Storm: Game Day

Post by greeneyed »

AUDIO: Canberra Raiders coach Ricky Stuart speaks about the loss to the Melbourne Storm

Canberra Raiders coach Ricky Stuart speaks to Brett McKay on Canberra Grandstand after the loss to the Melbourne Storm last night. (0:00 min mark)

Audio: https://www.abc.net.au/radio/canberra/p ... d/10909074
Image
RedRaider
Laurie Daley
Posts: 11312
Joined: March 3, 2007, 7:02 pm

Re: Aidan Sezer

Post by RedRaider »

-PJ- wrote: March 22, 2019, 7:31 pm Happy Clapper..Winx's bitch since 2017
No surprise that Winx has done it again today.

Fabulous consistency from the mare. Unlike Aidan Sezer who's only consistency is his inconsistency. Sticky has his favourites and will stay with them, just like the jumbo props selections of last year. Sam Williams was better in the trials than Sezer. I read the Mounties thread and he apparently played well for Mounties again today (queue those who scream ' but it's only reggies'). He is playing well against the opposition he is put in against. Sezer is not. I don't expect Sticky will drop him. He should but he won't.
User avatar
Botman
Mal Meninga
Posts: 42200
Joined: June 18, 2013, 4:31 pm
Favourite Player: Elliott Whitehead

Re: Aidan Sezer

Post by Botman »

Well, I mean he’s been spoken about for origin a number of times (though not in the last 2-3 years), he was probably close to a call up a few times in those dark days for NSW and he was playing very well for the Titans. Certainly his name was brought up in the media a few times early in his career

I got your point. You didn’t know what state he was from.

But that says it all!
User avatar
Botman
Mal Meninga
Posts: 42200
Joined: June 18, 2013, 4:31 pm
Favourite Player: Elliott Whitehead

Re: Aidan Sezer

Post by Botman »

Green Chapel wrote: March 23, 2019, 2:26 pm Maybe miss piggy can figure it out for ya !!
Fwiw miss piggy doesn’t give the faintest **** about the footy anymore
She doesn’t know nor care who Aiden Sezer is, and that, my dear friend, really says it all.
User avatar
gerg
Laurie Daley
Posts: 12697
Joined: June 24, 2008, 4:22 pm

Re: Aidan Sezer

Post by gerg »

I've been a staunch supporter of Sezer but he doesn't show something in the next 5 to 6 weeks maybe Williams deserves a chance. Sezer has been given the reins to lead the side around. He was good with game management last week but pretty ordinary last night.

Sent from my SM-G570F using Tapatalk

Shoving it in your face since 2017
User avatar
Botman
Mal Meninga
Posts: 42200
Joined: June 18, 2013, 4:31 pm
Favourite Player: Elliott Whitehead

Re: Aidan Sezer

Post by Botman »

Williams has had a chance. That’s the problem. All you’re doing with Williams is shifting the problems
We’ll may be slightly better in attack, and suddenly we’ve got the Blake Austin problem again.

And maybe that’s more manageable now we have Wighton in the halves? Or maybe that’ll just force teams to attack that one weakness even more.

Ultimately the club and it think most fans know the results won’t change much between the two, it’s just how you and lose that will change. Neither of these dudes is the answer, they’ve each been given chances to prove otherwise and here we are.

Which is probably why the English lad has been signed.
Green eyed Mick
Laurie Daley
Posts: 13407
Joined: February 26, 2010, 6:01 pm
Favourite Player: Brett Mullins
Location: Canberra :(

Re: Aidan Sezer

Post by Green eyed Mick »

PigRickman wrote: March 23, 2019, 3:26 pm Williams has had a chance. That’s the problem. All you’re doing with Williams is shifting the problems
We’ll may be slightly better in attack, and suddenly we’ve got the Blake Austin problem again.

And maybe that’s more manageable now we have Wighton in the halves? Or maybe that’ll just force teams to attack that one weakness even more.

Ultimately the club and it think most fans know the results won’t change much between the two, it’s just how you and lose that will change. Neither of these dudes is the answer, they’ve each been given chances to prove otherwise and here we are.

Which is probably why the English lad has been signed.
I think we would be a better side with Williams. I thought the same last year. Williams and Wighton will work better together because Williams is a natural first receiver and Sezer is not. It's really that simple.
User avatar
Sezer's Palace
Peter Jackson
Posts: 284
Joined: July 20, 2013, 7:40 pm
Favourite Player: Aidan Sezer

Re: 2019 Rd 2 V Storm: Game Day

Post by Sezer's Palace »

A few thoughts:

- I've been really impressed by CNK so far but something to keep an eye on is his positioning for the Storm's second try. Not sure if it's a tactic or just a brain explosion but he did it against the Bulldogs in the trial as well and we were almost caught out. Hopefully doesn't happen again.
- I'd probably rather see someone else in for Lui. He's been ineffective carting the ball in both games and he's not a particularly strong defender. Would probably like to see Guler come in but haven't seen any of Mounties this season so not sure who's been strong there.
- I don't think Sezer was as bad as has been said. Granted, his first 20 was awful and that kick for Rapana in particular was both a bad idea/bad execution but I thought after that he was okay. Hodgson's decisions in the red zone frustrated me more so than Sezer's and I thought he did a better job of straightening/taking on the line this week. He needs to stand closer to the ruck as first receiver, at the moment he is standing so far away that it's a difficult pass to make and it's causing him to start flat footed.
- I'd like to see us utilise Whitehead better in attack. He's such a weapon with his hands/hole running/short kick chase but at the moment he's just being used for tough carries/short balls. We also need to get Leilua more early ball, going to the right seems to be an after thought at the moment.
- Rapana looked a bit underdone but it was great to have his enthusiasm back.
- Horsburgh will be great if he can get those dumb penalties out of his game. Love his aggression and offload but has to be more disciplined.

I think that's all for the moment. The Storm have been clinical to start the season and I think we were overwhelmed by their intensity and ruck control. With a 7 day turnaround I'm still very confident we'll do the Knights.
Instagram: @sezerspalace
Twitter: @jackkcronin
zilhouse
Tom Learoyd-Lahrs
Posts: 61
Joined: June 16, 2018, 7:51 pm
Favourite Player: Alan tongue

Re: 2019 Rd 2 V Storm: Game Day

Post by zilhouse »

Rickmando wrote: March 23, 2019, 1:51 pm
gergreg wrote: March 23, 2019, 11:22 am
-TW- wrote:Bit hard to chase them when they shell them down the back 3s throat all night

Didn't know we had Josh McCrone for a cameo appearance
For the first 40/50 odd minutes our strategy was one out forward hitups for 4 tackles which allowed us to be completely dominated in the ruck, which meant we weren't making any ground and weren't countering the wrestle. Because of this their wingers were dropping back on the fourth meaning there was not much open space to kick. We could have tried a few shorter kicks behind the line. We didn't have enough bodies in motion to stop our forwards from being monstered in gang tackles. This is something I believe Crawley would have rectified.

We have no plays, no structured play, it's like they just toss it around and wait for something to open up. This doesnt work against the top teams with good defence. You need structured plays to create gaps.

We were outcoached.

Sent from my SM-G570F using Tapatalk
I’d agree that our attacking structure has been sorely lacking for a long time. Even a massive Rick-head like me can see that.

But I’d also argue that our “improvised” attack leaves something to be desired. I love Jordy Raps and to a lesser extent BJ, but when those guys go to dummy half they run it 100% of the time. There’s no thought to pass it occasionally just to keep defences guessing/honest. Kicking is the same. What about the occasional chip over the top to put doubt in a fullbacks mind?

It seems as though we have blokes who are trying to follow a structured, rigid plan of attacking - but either they aren’t executing it very well, or the plan isn’t very good.

Bottom line - we have a lot of players in this team with low football IQ
I disagree with the bottom line man. A team with a guy like hodgson isnt low IQ. If your team is doing 4 one out hit ups they are doing it because they are coached to do that.
Its not always a bad strategy but at NRL level it generally is. There are a few ways that can work i.e. if you have a team full of big boppers who are hard to handle and get quick play the balls, or if youre playing a team in the wet who drop lots of footy i.e. titans. Doing that verses the storm is just asking for a pounding. They can get numbers into the tackles and slow it down so you lose any momentum. The way to beat the storm is through offloads, getting one on one tackles when you have the ball and complete at a high %.

The 2016 attack wasnt rigid. Our attack started to get rigid the last few games into 2018. Whoever is coaching attack at the moment is banking on playing under 15 level footy for the rest of the year.
User avatar
Leebola
Brett Mullins
Posts: 1376
Joined: October 5, 2006, 9:03 pm

Re: 2019 Rd 2 V Storm: Game Day

Post by Leebola »

Rickmando wrote: March 23, 2019, 1:51 pm What about the occasional chip over the top to put doubt in a fullbacks mind?
Yessir!! This is what has been grinding my gears for a while now. We bitched and moaned throughout 2017 and 2018 the teams were coming up so fast (or were standing offside) they'd stifle our attacking weapons out wide. Well, if teams are moving up quick, then put the ball behind them!! Make them turn around and chase - if they're up fast or offside, then the race to the ball is that much closer! Put them in two minds! Put some questions into the fullback's mind! Ricky Stuart was a master of the chip-and-chase, either for himself or others.

Christ, why is it that randoms on a RL forum can see this stuff, but RL professionals on six- and seven figures can't seem to manage it.
User avatar
Botman
Mal Meninga
Posts: 42200
Joined: June 18, 2013, 4:31 pm
Favourite Player: Elliott Whitehead

Re: Aidan Sezer

Post by Botman »

We might be marginally better in attack, but we’d be significantly worse in defence
The game is played on both sides and unfortunately both options leave us exposed on one side.

I’ve watched enough footy and enough of this raiders team to say we’ve got the strike power to score points despite Sezer’s limitations
I’ve seen nothing to suggest we can stand up defensively with a player of Williams limitations

For me, it’s as simple as that. If we have to pick a poison here, defence wins more in this league more than offence
We’ve been the best attacking side in the league over the last 2 years and haven’t sniffed the play offs

Let’s hooe the pommy Williams can give us a little of both.
Post Reply