The Jarrod Croker binning
Moderator: GH Moderators
The Jarrod Croker binning
Not blaming refs at all for the loss, the bunnies played well and were too good whilst we were lifeless, if soliola doesnt spark our middle no one does.
It just seemed to me he got off sent off by anticipation without actually holding on to long.
The ref thought he would and sent him before he actually held on for too long slowing down the ptb.
Anyone got any vision?
Also thought it was rough burgess stayed on the field.
It just seemed to me he got off sent off by anticipation without actually holding on to long.
The ref thought he would and sent him before he actually held on for too long slowing down the ptb.
Anyone got any vision?
Also thought it was rough burgess stayed on the field.
Re: The Jarrod Crocker Binning
He touched the arm before he had the ball and that was enough apparently. Soft ruling.
Sent from my iPhone using The Greenhouse mobile app powered by Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using The Greenhouse mobile app powered by Tapatalk
Re: The Jarrod Crocker Binning
Someone else was binned this round for something similar.
Our defence, I'll give it a good grief.
Our defence, I'll give it a good grief.
WorkChoice
Re: The Jarrod Crocker Binning
I suspect that the refs were confused by the fact that he actually made a tackle
- reptar
- Laurie Daley
- Posts: 15755
- Joined: January 25, 2005, 9:24 pm
- Favourite Player: Josh Hodgson
- Location: Brisbane
Re: The Jarrod Crocker Binning
Why wasn't Inglis binned for throwing the ball away after Souths had given away a 3rd penalty in a row?
Gina Riley: Oh, come on, John. That’s a bit old hat, the corrupt IOC delegate.
John Clarke: Old hat? Gina, in the scientific world when they see that something is happening again and again and again, repeatedly, they don’t call it old hat. They call it a pattern.
John Clarke: Old hat? Gina, in the scientific world when they see that something is happening again and again and again, repeatedly, they don’t call it old hat. They call it a pattern.
- reptar
- Laurie Daley
- Posts: 15755
- Joined: January 25, 2005, 9:24 pm
- Favourite Player: Josh Hodgson
- Location: Brisbane
Re: The Jarrod Crocker Binning
Of course! My bad!
Gina Riley: Oh, come on, John. That’s a bit old hat, the corrupt IOC delegate.
John Clarke: Old hat? Gina, in the scientific world when they see that something is happening again and again and again, repeatedly, they don’t call it old hat. They call it a pattern.
John Clarke: Old hat? Gina, in the scientific world when they see that something is happening again and again and again, repeatedly, they don’t call it old hat. They call it a pattern.
- gangrenous
- Laurie Daley
- Posts: 16586
- Joined: May 12, 2007, 10:42 pm
Re: The Jarrod Crocker Binning
The Jarrod Croker binning was disgusting. Was not even a penalty, let alone a binning.
Re: The Jarrod Crocker Binning
I thought Jason Crocker had a barry of a game. He spent more time whinging than playing. He deserved to be sent to the bin for carrying on like a doofus at the ref all game. He would have been better off walking off the field, slapping Ricky in the face with his handbag and telling his girlfriends to follow him to the bathroom so they can whinge about how the Rabbitohs EDIT.
*Big Joe Tapine excluded.
*Big Joe Tapine excluded.
Last edited by greeneyed on April 21, 2018, 7:30 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Reason: Inappropriate comment for the forum
Reason: Inappropriate comment for the forum
- Sossman
- David Furner
- Posts: 3457
- Joined: August 28, 2006, 4:49 pm
- Favourite Player: Jarrod Croker
- Location: Brisbane, Australia
Re: The Jarrod Crocker Binning
Probably was a penalty (albeit a soft one) but definitely not worth 10 in the bin.
We would have lost today even if the refs were on our side, but boy didn't they rub salt into the wounds.
We would have lost today even if the refs were on our side, but boy didn't they rub salt into the wounds.
4 Time Boogs Award Winner.
Get tested for VIKING CLAP today. https://www.health.act.gov.au/hospitals ... lth-centre.
Get tested for VIKING CLAP today. https://www.health.act.gov.au/hospitals ... lth-centre.
- reptar
- Laurie Daley
- Posts: 15755
- Joined: January 25, 2005, 9:24 pm
- Favourite Player: Josh Hodgson
- Location: Brisbane
Re: The Jarrod Crocker Binning
Nah, refs were okay I thought. Just the usual couple of things I'd like explained, but the decisions seemed fair enough. Croker did deserve a penalty against him for that.
Gina Riley: Oh, come on, John. That’s a bit old hat, the corrupt IOC delegate.
John Clarke: Old hat? Gina, in the scientific world when they see that something is happening again and again and again, repeatedly, they don’t call it old hat. They call it a pattern.
John Clarke: Old hat? Gina, in the scientific world when they see that something is happening again and again and again, repeatedly, they don’t call it old hat. They call it a pattern.
-
- David Grant
- Posts: 704
- Joined: September 5, 2016, 11:09 am
- Favourite Player: Jarrod croker
Re: The Jarrod Crocker Binning
Your a few years to late on this attack on jason mateCaptain Punish wrote:I thought Jason Crocker had a barry of a game. He spent more time whinging than playing. He deserved to be sent to the bin for carrying on like a doofus at the ref all game. He would have been better off walking off the field, slapping Ricky in the face with his handbag and telling his girlfriends to follow him to the bathroom so they can whinge about how the Rabbitohs manhandled their vaginas.
*Big Joe Tapine excluded.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: The Jarrod Crocker binning
When I saw it live, I wasn't at all surprised he was binned. Fair call from the referee, even if it was on the tough side... no point complaining about it. None whatsoever. That loss was entirely on the team and coaches.
- gangrenous
- Laurie Daley
- Posts: 16586
- Joined: May 12, 2007, 10:42 pm
Re: The Jarrod Crocker binning
What are you smoking ge?
Re: The Jarrod Crocker binning
Jarrod Crocker
Sent from my G8141 using Tapatalk
Sent from my G8141 using Tapatalk
-
- Laurie Daley
- Posts: 12395
- Joined: April 29, 2017, 7:22 pm
- Favourite Player: Ashley Gilbert
Re: The Jarrod Crocker binning
Didn't help him that Cotric was calling for him to be binned so that he had a chance to see the ball for 10 minutes.
Re: The Jarrod Crocker binning
Nothing. Spending time talking about refereeing decisions absolves the club from accountability for the poor performance. There were some reasons why the Raiders were flogged today... and it had nothing to do with a single refereeing decision. Yet all we heard in the press conference were comments about refereeing decisions. It is a culture which doesn't encourage accountability... even if we add, "it's no excuse"... just talking about it is an "excuse".... there should be no discussion of it. The comments at a press conference should be about where the Raiders need to improve... because there's lots of scope for it, and I didn't hear a thing about it tonight. The club supporters deserve a better explanation than we heard tonight.
- gangrenous
- Laurie Daley
- Posts: 16586
- Joined: May 12, 2007, 10:42 pm
The Jarrod Crocker binning
I don’t have a problem with that. Yep, there are big problems at the Raiders, and the lack of anyone with a strategic brain seems the biggest.
But that doesn’t mean that Was sin bin worthy. No way. Crazy talk. Absolute Barry Croker of a decision.
But that doesn’t mean that Was sin bin worthy. No way. Crazy talk. Absolute Barry Croker of a decision.
- reptar
- Laurie Daley
- Posts: 15755
- Joined: January 25, 2005, 9:24 pm
- Favourite Player: Josh Hodgson
- Location: Brisbane
Re: The Jarrod Crocker binning
Gangers i blame you for not having bonus haiku this week!
Gina Riley: Oh, come on, John. That’s a bit old hat, the corrupt IOC delegate.
John Clarke: Old hat? Gina, in the scientific world when they see that something is happening again and again and again, repeatedly, they don’t call it old hat. They call it a pattern.
John Clarke: Old hat? Gina, in the scientific world when they see that something is happening again and again and again, repeatedly, they don’t call it old hat. They call it a pattern.
- Northern Raider
- Mal Meninga
- Posts: 32522
- Joined: June 19, 2007, 8:17 am
- Favourite Player: Dean Lance
- Location: Greener pastures
Re: The Jarrod Crocker binning
A penalty was questionable. Sin bin was straight out wrong.
Wasn’t a factor in the result though. Comprehensible outplayed today.
Wasn’t a factor in the result though. Comprehensible outplayed today.
* The author assumes no responsibility for the topicality, correctness, completeness or quality of information provided.
Re: The Jarrod Crocker binning
How about we were comprehensively outplayed.
The sin bin was a product of that.
The sin bin was a product of that.
WorkChoice
Re: The Jarrod Crocker binning
GE...Please. Did you spend all arvo with Nickman and Pigman? Agree absolutely 100% on the accountability and whatever else, you won't get an argument (see my comments in the Game Day thread). But after the decisions you've blown up about over the years, this is right up there. As the break is made Croker has contact with the support player which happens as it is a contact sport but he doesn't pull him back or tackle him. But when the ball is passed and received and what Croker does, there is no way it is even a penalty. It's a clanger from any angle. I watched the game with a Tigers fan who thought it was absurd. If Croker had the minerals he should have blown a gasket and blasted the ref, he was already in the bin and he wasn't going to be sent.greeneyed wrote: ↑April 21, 2018, 8:12 pmNothing. Spending time talking about refereeing decisions absolves the club from accountability for the poor performance. There were some reasons why the Raiders were flogged today... and it had nothing to do with a single refereeing decision. Yet all we heard in the press conference were comments about refereeing decisions. It is a culture which doesn't encourage accountability... even if we add, "it's no excuse"... just talking about it is an "excuse".... there should be no discussion of it. The comments at a press conference should be about where the Raiders need to improve... because there's lots of scope for it, and I didn't hear a thing about it tonight. The club supporters deserve a better explanation than we heard tonight.
We continue to **** about with blokes that are part of some fraternity. It's infuriating.
Re: The Jarrod Crocker binning
LP - love your posts mate.
Agree we were comprehensively outplayed and I have no excuses at all. But that doesn't mean the sin bin wasn't a disgrace. The incident within the 80 minutes was incorrect, it's fair to call it as such.
We continue to **** about with blokes that are part of some fraternity. It's infuriating.
Re: The Jarrod Crocker binning
Mate not as articulate as some of you, would love it if you posted more often.
I come here to read comments tbh, yourself, Pig, Rodman, Michael, Bay...the list goes on. I'm always entertained, there is always a lot of thought and effort in peoples post and as a supporter of this forum I appreciate it.
WorkChoice
Re: The Jarrod Crocker binning
I am in the 'harsh call' camp. Support players are often bumped by defenders and that doesn't rate a penalty let alone a sin bin. It wasn't as if the Souths player was tackled/bumped to the ground as Croker was in a number of his kick chases. The Raiders were already behind in the match and came out after half time with some renewed vigour. Then JC was sent to the bin and Souths scored a number of times while he was while he was in the bin. The decision was a factor in Souths being able to extend their lead. I find it amazing that this innocuous action warranted time in the bin when deliberate contact with the head (Burgess on Bateman, S.Burgess on Sezer) did not.
- gangrenous
- Laurie Daley
- Posts: 16586
- Joined: May 12, 2007, 10:42 pm
Re: The Jarrod Crocker binning
First live game for me this season and I really only have myself to blame.reptar wrote:Gangers i blame you for not having bonus haiku this week!
Had a lovely day though. Beautiful weather. Expected to lose so it didn’t hurt so bad.
-
- Brett Mullins
- Posts: 1526
- Joined: August 11, 2016, 8:16 am
- Favourite Player: Ruben Wiki
Re: The Jarrod Crocker binning
It was a laughable decision. If it was Billy Slater or Johnathan Thurston no chance they go to the bin.
But I also agree with GE - we were just plain soft today and no ref decisions cost us.
But I also agree with GE - we were just plain soft today and no ref decisions cost us.
Re: The Jarrod Crocker binning
RR, its something the NRL are looking at. Someone else has been binned this round(not sure of the game)for something similar. The facts are they had just made another line break.
If you are playing this bad you are not going to get the calls, the refs have to make a call and in all honesty with the run of play I'm happy with it.
If you are playing this bad you are not going to get the calls, the refs have to make a call and in all honesty with the run of play I'm happy with it.
WorkChoice
Re: The Jarrod Crocker binning
Latrell Mitchell in the Roosters game
- gangrenous
- Laurie Daley
- Posts: 16586
- Joined: May 12, 2007, 10:42 pm
Re: The Jarrod Crocker binning
The NRL refs are pretty good at lending a hand to self-fulfilling prophecies with the way they treat certain teams though.LP Raider wrote:RR, its something the NRL are looking at. Someone else has been binned this round(not sure of the game)for something similar. The facts are they had just made another line break.
If you are playing this bad you are not going to get the calls, the refs have to make a call and in all honesty with the run of play I'm happy with it.
Re: The Jarrod Crocker binning
It had absolutely no impact on the result.
It was a ridiculous call.
It was a ridiculous call.
Son, we live in a world that has forums, and those forums have to be guarded by Mods. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Nickman? I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. You weep for Lucy, and you curse GE. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know -- that GE’s moderation, while tragic, probably saved lives; and my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, keeps threads on track and under the appropriately sized, highlighted green headings.
You want moderation because deep down in places you don't talk about at parties, you want me on that forum -- you need me on that forum. We use words like "stay on topic," "use the appropriate forum," "please delete." We use these words as the backbone of a life spent defending something. You use them as a punch line. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very moderation that I provide and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather that you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest you get a green handle and edit a post. Either way, I don't give a DAMN what you think about moderation.
Re: The Jarrod Crocker binning
Mate the NRL has lost the plot on the sin binning this year, it's becoming a thing. Last week Bateman got binned because they wanted to square it up, the tackle they pinned him for was absurd, he layed on the tackled player for less than 80% of the tackles in that game but they felt they had to even up the penalties and sin binings so they sent him. It wasn't right at all. It didn't affect the result but the refs knew that so their stats aligned. It is out of control as far as i'm concerned.LP Raider wrote: ↑April 21, 2018, 9:34 pm RR, its something the NRL are looking at. Someone else has been binned this round(not sure of the game)for something similar. The facts are they had just made another line break.
If you are playing this bad you are not going to get the calls, the refs have to make a call and in all honesty with the run of play I'm happy with it.
What I want to say about the Croker one is don't worry about the run of play of any of that other BS. It's totally irrelevant. What is relevant is what actually occurred and it isn't a sin bin since the game was invented. If he tackles the lad before he receives the ball then we take our medicine but that's not the case. Our player went to the bin for tackling off the ball when it wasn't. That's the start and the end of the debate, everything outside that is noise.
We continue to **** about with blokes that are part of some fraternity. It's infuriating.
- gangrenous
- Laurie Daley
- Posts: 16586
- Joined: May 12, 2007, 10:42 pm
Re: The Jarrod Crocker binning
I saw raiderskater refer to it as a “Garbage” binning. That seems perfect.
Re: The Jarrod Crocker binning
No I spent all afternoon surrounded by 14,000 Rabbitohs fans in delerium, and I was watching a completely embarrassing performance being dished up yet again by my team. The culture of accountablity at our club is very poor. And I'm tired. I spend a lot of time and effort supporting the club, but performance is just not up to the mark and it has been going on for almost a quarter of a century. We have the longest premiership drought in the league, apart from the Eels. And they at least have made a Grand Final since our last premiership. Only we and the Titans have failed to make a decider since 1994. I'm tired, I'm dispirited, I'm despondent and can't see any way out of the mess.Woodgers wrote: ↑April 21, 2018, 8:46 pmGE...Please. Did you spend all arvo with Nickman and Pigman? Agree absolutely 100% on the accountability and whatever else, you won't get an argument (see my comments in the Game Day thread). But after the decisions you've blown up about over the years, this is right up there. As the break is made Croker has contact with the support player which happens as it is a contact sport but he doesn't pull him back or tackle him. But when the ball is passed and received and what Croker does, there is no way it is even a penalty. It's a clanger from any angle. I watched the game with a Tigers fan who thought it was absurd. If Croker had the minerals he should have blown a gasket and blasted the ref, he was already in the bin and he wasn't going to be sent.greeneyed wrote: ↑April 21, 2018, 8:12 pmNothing. Spending time talking about refereeing decisions absolves the club from accountability for the poor performance. There were some reasons why the Raiders were flogged today... and it had nothing to do with a single refereeing decision. Yet all we heard in the press conference were comments about refereeing decisions. It is a culture which doesn't encourage accountability... even if we add, "it's no excuse"... just talking about it is an "excuse".... there should be no discussion of it. The comments at a press conference should be about where the Raiders need to improve... because there's lots of scope for it, and I didn't hear a thing about it tonight. The club supporters deserve a better explanation than we heard tonight.