Re: NRL ban Jack Wighton for 10 matches, impose $30,000 fine
Posted: August 8, 2018, 4:21 am
The Canberra Raiders Supporters Forum
https://thegh.com.au/forum/
It's too late Matt, I'm already thought of as crazy and senile. The good thing about senility though, is that in 5 minutes it's a whole new worldMatt wrote: ↑August 7, 2018, 10:11 pmBe careful with outrageous statements like body typing or playing style RR. People will think youre crazy...RedRaider wrote: ↑August 7, 2018, 9:58 pm I hope Cotric will continue to be picked at fullback for the rest of this year. I think he has the goods to be a top flight full back. He is already better under the high ball than Jack imo. This is a key skill for the role. Defensively he is up to the role as well. In attack he was getting more involved last weekend and I hope to see this continue in the coming weeks. As his confidence grows I think we will hear more talk from him which is another skill a fullback needs imo.
As for next year, I think Jack is more likely to find himself in the three quarter line. I have said before that I think BJ has the makings of a back rower. He is big enough and tough enough. He will not have to make as many defensive decisions either. Just tackle what is in front of him. At center he persistently stays out on his opposition center. This leaves a huge hole to his left which is often exploited by opposition sides including Penrith again last weekend. He would not displace any of the current starting International backrowers but would be a very good bench impact player imo.
What about we just put him at prop and rotate him with Bateman, whichever is on at the time can slot into Hooker like you've said. Also, let's not rule out Rapa for long kicks (40/20ʼs and such) and Whitehead for short kicks. BJ rolled one into the in goal on the weekend too didn't he?zim wrote: ↑August 7, 2018, 10:29 pmOne option would be to have Havili at lock to free up hodgo on the fifth to provide that extra option on both sides of the ruck but then you need to juggle your international back row around it.Pigman wrote:Wighton will need to improve his kicking game for sure.zim wrote: ↑August 7, 2018, 8:34 pmThat's the Q, well as far as I'm concerned.Matt wrote:Surely the Q is,
Williams at half.
Or
Oldie on a wing
I can see the pros and cons either way. But once a decision is made it needs to be stuck to.
Fortunately this seems less impactful than which 2 hookers to use instead of hodgo.
The biggest concern with the Williams / Wighton swap would be the kicking game. Sammy takes a lot of pressure off Sezer, but, our biggest issue is defence.
I dont think we can bank on Sezer recapturing his Titans form... even i've given up on that, which is a shame, because as primary kicker he was excellent. We'll need a secondary kicker, and honestly it cant be Hodgson. I love the guy and when he picks his spots, he's tremendous as a kicker... but you want him taking 2, maybe 3 a game... so we need a secondary kicker in the halves to ease the pressure on Sezer... it'd help if we ever positioned well to make a good kick too, feels like 1/3 times our kicker, whoever it is, is getting the ball high, low or wide and it throws their motion off.
yep
RedRaider wrote: ↑August 8, 2018, 5:53 amIt's too late Matt, I'm already thought of as crazy and senile. The good thing about senility though, is that in 5 minutes it's a whole new worldMatt wrote: ↑August 7, 2018, 10:11 pmBe careful with outrageous statements like body typing or playing style RR. People will think youre crazy...RedRaider wrote: ↑August 7, 2018, 9:58 pm I hope Cotric will continue to be picked at fullback for the rest of this year. I think he has the goods to be a top flight full back. He is already better under the high ball than Jack imo. This is a key skill for the role. Defensively he is up to the role as well. In attack he was getting more involved last weekend and I hope to see this continue in the coming weeks. As his confidence grows I think we will hear more talk from him which is another skill a fullback needs imo.
As for next year, I think Jack is more likely to find himself in the three quarter line. I have said before that I think BJ has the makings of a back rower. He is big enough and tough enough. He will not have to make as many defensive decisions either. Just tackle what is in front of him. At center he persistently stays out on his opposition center. This leaves a huge hole to his left which is often exploited by opposition sides including Penrith again last weekend. He would not displace any of the current starting International backrowers but would be a very good bench impact player imo.
I think Jack has a pretty good footy brain.gangrenous wrote: ↑August 8, 2018, 6:26 pm I agree with Woodgers except for the part about Jack having the brains to make the right plays, and his spelling of Hingano.
Norman's football intelligence leaves Jack's for dead. Also we saw Jack at 5/8 and he was garbage and we wanted him out.Green eyed Mick wrote:I think Jack has a pretty good footy brain.gangrenous wrote: ↑August 8, 2018, 6:26 pm I agree with Woodgers except for the part about Jack having the brains to make the right plays, and his spelling of Hingano.
I'd prefer jack at 6 over any of the currently off contract halves.
Is that an option?Captain Punish wrote:Norman's football intelligence leaves Jack's for dead. Also we saw Jack at 5/8 and he was garbage and we wanted him out.Green eyed Mick wrote:I think Jack has a pretty good footy brain.gangrenous wrote: ↑August 8, 2018, 6:26 pm I agree with Woodgers except for the part about Jack having the brains to make the right plays, and his spelling of Hingano.
I'd prefer jack at 6 over any of the currently off contract halves.
This has McCrone to hooker written all over it.
Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk
I guess it's not critical to have a specialized option in at hooker to provide the occasional 5th tackle feed, and Havili will rotate in eventually during the course of the game to provide it if needed.Archer wrote: ↑August 8, 2018, 7:47 amWhat about we just put him at prop and rotate him with Bateman, whichever is on at the time can slot into Hooker like you've said. Also, let's not rule out Rapa for long kicks (40/20ʼs and such) and Whitehead for short kicks. BJ rolled one into the in goal on the weekend too didn't he?zim wrote: ↑August 7, 2018, 10:29 pmOne option would be to have Havili at lock to free up hodgo on the fifth to provide that extra option on both sides of the ruck but then you need to juggle your international back row around it.Pigman wrote:Wighton will need to improve his kicking game for sure.zim wrote: ↑August 7, 2018, 8:34 pmThat's the Q, well as far as I'm concerned.Matt wrote:Surely the Q is,
Williams at half.
Or
Oldie on a wing
I can see the pros and cons either way. But once a decision is made it needs to be stuck to.
Fortunately this seems less impactful than which 2 hookers to use instead of hodgo.
The biggest concern with the Williams / Wighton swap would be the kicking game. Sammy takes a lot of pressure off Sezer, but, our biggest issue is defence.
I dont think we can bank on Sezer recapturing his Titans form... even i've given up on that, which is a shame, because as primary kicker he was excellent. We'll need a secondary kicker, and honestly it cant be Hodgson. I love the guy and when he picks his spots, he's tremendous as a kicker... but you want him taking 2, maybe 3 a game... so we need a secondary kicker in the halves to ease the pressure on Sezer... it'd help if we ever positioned well to make a good kick too, feels like 1/3 times our kicker, whoever it is, is getting the ball high, low or wide and it throws their motion off.
Seiffert82 wrote: ↑August 9, 2018, 6:34 pm I've seen nothing in Cotric's game or style that indicates to me he is a long term fullback for the Raiders. Centre or Second Row maybe, but not fullback.
If the club sticks by Wighton, my big home is that he pulls his head in and realises what he needs to do to become a top 5 fullback in the NRL, which is what he absolutely could be if his head was screwed on.
I'd say you are spot on there.Coastalraider wrote: ↑October 8, 2018, 11:39 am Methinks the Raiders are about to look pretty stupid.
My gut tells me when this is released to public their initial reaction of a 6 week ban is going to look very poor indeed.
Well, there's Ricky's excuse at the very least.SeeBee101 wrote:............And that's our 2019 season gone before it starts.....
Zero chance. The club and NRL have seen the CCTV vision in determining their (different) penalties.Dusty wrote: ↑October 8, 2018, 1:03 pm Is he still a chance of being sacked?
I don’t believe so, he’s been punished by the NRL and the club (I think?). The only
Punishment left is from the courts. I guess, depending on the punishment, he could be punished further.
Sent from my iPhone using The Greenhouse
Well the club insisted the footage isn't that bad so really how bad could it be? I mean really, what young man hasn't assaulted 5 blokes on a big night out in Civic? Well maybe 4 blokes now that GE doesn't go out after dark anymore.edwahu wrote:No matter what gets shown there will be outrage but what's on the video is pretty clearly described already. Nobody should be too shocked at what it shows when it is released.
NRL just make stuff on the fly. I could see them saying new information has come to light and we have extended the penalty. I am sure this is part of the reason why the NRL made it 10 weeks in the first place, given we only had 10 weeks to go. They knew he wouldn't be back playing before the court date. I would hope that if this does happen the NRL is question what new information as they had the video etc before they made their decision.Northern Raider wrote: ↑October 8, 2018, 2:22 pm NRL has handed down their punishment. Can't change that due to retrospective public outrage.
They normally make it up on the fly based on outrage at the time. It's always a reaction to the story breaking e.g. the Monaghan situation.kona_dream wrote:NRL just make stuff on the fly. I could see them saying new information has come to light and we have extended the penalty. I am sure this is part of the reason why the NRL made it 10 weeks in the first place, given we only had 10 weeks to go. They knew he wouldn't be back playing before the court date. I would hope that if this does happen the NRL is question what new information as they had the video etc before they made their decision.Northern Raider wrote: ↑October 8, 2018, 2:22 pm NRL has handed down their punishment. Can't change that due to retrospective public outrage.
Also, are they government issued, or does someone have to pay for them?Begbie wrote:Will the NRL let Jack play wearing an ankle bracelet if he is ordered to do so?