NRL ban Jack Wighton for 10 matches, impose $30,000 fine

All the news on the Canberra Raiders NRL team, all in one place

Moderator: GH Moderators

Locked
User avatar
Lucy
Brett Mullins
Posts: 1258
Joined: June 24, 2017, 8:47 pm
Favourite Player: Tarps

Re: NRL ban Jack Wighton for 10 matches, impose $30,000 fine

Post by Lucy »

Wighton has been at fullback for over 5 season and is still far from a decent, consistent fullback. Cotric has had one game.

I would love the club to sack him post sentencing because as far as fullbacks go, he can run out in another jumper next season and be someone else's mental midget and defensive liability.

Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk


User avatar
Lucy
Brett Mullins
Posts: 1258
Joined: June 24, 2017, 8:47 pm
Favourite Player: Tarps

Re: NRL ban Jack Wighton for 10 matches, impose $30,000 fine

Post by Lucy »

Pigman wrote:
papabear wrote: July 15, 2018, 10:22 am Am I the only one who thinks we should use this as an opportunity to can a crappy contract and use the salary cap space more productively.

Especially with citric available and abbey as a back up.
Nope. A few of us are in this boat
What he did was worthy of being sacked, and it would certainly help us rectify some other issues in the squad

Cotric with raps and oldfield on the wings is a-ok with me
Exactly.

Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk

User avatar
Manchild
Jason Croker
Posts: 4864
Joined: September 28, 2011, 11:29 am
Favourite Player: Past: Brad Clyde
Present: Shaun Fensom
Location: Darwin, NT

Re: NRL ban Jack Wighton for 10 matches, impose $30,000 fine

Post by Manchild »

New signingImage
LastRaider
John Ferguson
Posts: 2383
Joined: March 31, 2018, 9:30 pm

Re: NRL ban Jack Wighton for 10 matches, impose $30,000 fine

Post by LastRaider »

Yep I would be happy to move Jack on. Plenty of options available to us there at the moment.


Sent from my iPhone using The Greenhouse
sprintman
Brett Mullins
Posts: 1473
Joined: July 11, 2015, 5:57 pm
Favourite Player: Laurie Daley
Location: Canberra

Re: NRL ban Jack Wighton for 10 matches, impose $30,000 fine

Post by sprintman »

Should have been sacked. Sadly Raiders moral crusade is no more
User avatar
Dr Zaius
Mal Meninga
Posts: 22916
Joined: April 15, 2007, 11:03 am
Location: Queensland somewhere

Re: NRL ban Jack Wighton for 10 matches, impose $30,000 fine

Post by Dr Zaius »

Manchild wrote:New signingImage
Anyone seen this guy getting around in the Canberra Raiders Cup? Can he play?
User avatar
greeneyed
Don Furner
Posts: 145324
Joined: January 7, 2005, 4:21 pm

Re: NRL ban Jack Wighton for 10 matches, impose $30,000 fine

Post by greeneyed »

Captain Punish wrote: July 15, 2018, 11:04 am Wighton has been at fullback for over 5 season and is still far from a decent, consistent fullback. Cotric has had one game.

I would love the club to sack him post sentencing because as far as fullbacks go, he can run out in another jumper next season and be someone else's mental midget and defensive liability.

Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk
Why are you so consistently a horrible person on this forum?
Image
User avatar
Botman
Mal Meninga
Posts: 42202
Joined: June 18, 2013, 4:31 pm
Favourite Player: Elliott Whitehead

Re: NRL ban Jack Wighton for 10 matches, impose $30,000 fine

Post by Botman »

I’ve not seen him but I’ve heard he’s a very willing defender
Doesn’t mind hitting a bloke
User avatar
RTW
David Furner
Posts: 3762
Joined: July 29, 2008, 7:05 pm
Favourite Player: Laurie Daley
Location: Brisbane

Re: NRL ban Jack Wighton for 10 matches, impose $30,000 fine

Post by RTW »

sprintman wrote:Should have been sacked. Sadly Raiders moral crusade is no more

Players don’t get sacked from an NRL team on moral grounds. They get sacked when they **** up and the club are happy to move them on. A good club will media spin it in their favour.
User avatar
Dr Zaius
Mal Meninga
Posts: 22916
Joined: April 15, 2007, 11:03 am
Location: Queensland somewhere

Re: NRL ban Jack Wighton for 10 matches, impose $30,000 fine

Post by Dr Zaius »

Pigman wrote:I’ve not seen him but I’ve heard he’s a very willing defender
Doesn’t mind hitting a bloke
I've heard that he's big hits lack impact
User avatar
Dr Zaius
Mal Meninga
Posts: 22916
Joined: April 15, 2007, 11:03 am
Location: Queensland somewhere

Re: NRL ban Jack Wighton for 10 matches, impose $30,000 fine

Post by Dr Zaius »

greeneyed wrote:
Captain Punish wrote: July 15, 2018, 11:04 am Wighton has been at fullback for over 5 season and is still far from a decent, consistent fullback. Cotric has had one game.

I would love the club to sack him post sentencing because as far as fullbacks go, he can run out in another jumper next season and be someone else's mental midget and defensive liability.

Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk
Why are you so consistently a horrible person on this forum?
I'll give you the tip, it's not just on this forum!
User avatar
dubby
Don Furner
Posts: 34005
Joined: May 16, 2006, 12:14 pm
Favourite Player: Mal Meninga
Location: You have never heard of it.

Re: NRL ban Jack Wighton for 10 matches, impose $30,000 fine

Post by dubby »

Worst thread ever

Sent from my SM-G950F using The Greenhouse mobile app powered by Tapatalk

The spiral of silence refers to the idea that when people fail to speak, the price of speaking rises. As the price to speak rises, still fewer speak out, which further causes the price to rise, so that fewer people yet will speak out, until a whole culture or nation is silenced. This is what happened in Germany.

If you do not speak, you are not being neutral, but are contributing to the success of the thing you refuse to name and condemn.
User avatar
gangrenous
Laurie Daley
Posts: 16704
Joined: May 12, 2007, 10:42 pm

Re: NRL ban Jack Wighton for 10 matches, impose $30,000 fine

Post by gangrenous »

How quickly everyone forgets classics like the Gay marriage thread...
User avatar
-TW-
Mal Meninga
Posts: 35427
Joined: July 2, 2007, 11:41 am

Re: NRL ban Jack Wighton for 10 matches, impose $30,000 fine

Post by -TW- »

gangrenous wrote:How quickly everyone forgets classics like the Gay marriage thread...
That's the worst thread ever and will never be beaten
User avatar
bonehead
Laurie Daley
Posts: 17455
Joined: March 1, 2005, 5:29 am
Location: Smelling The Shiraz

Re: NRL ban Jack Wighton for 10 matches, impose $30,000 fine

Post by bonehead »

Dr Zaius wrote:
greeneyed wrote:
Captain Punish wrote: July 15, 2018, 11:04 am Wighton has been at fullback for over 5 season and is still far from a decent, consistent fullback. Cotric has had one game.

I would love the club to sack him post sentencing because as far as fullbacks go, he can run out in another jumper next season and be someone else's mental midget and defensive liability.

Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk
Why are you so consistently a horrible person on this forum?
I'll give you the tip, it's not just on this forum!
is 4th season over 5 seasons?

Sent from my SM-G950F using The Greenhouse mobile app powered by Tapatalk

Edrick The Entertainer
User avatar
greeneyed
Don Furner
Posts: 145324
Joined: January 7, 2005, 4:21 pm

Re: NRL ban Jack Wighton for 10 matches, impose $30,000 fine

Post by greeneyed »

Jack Wighton paying for NRL's handling of Matt Lodge case: Canberra Raiders CEO Don Furner

Canberra Raiders boss Don Furner has poured more fuel on the Jack Wighton-suspension fire, claiming they're paying for the NRL's and Brisbane Broncos' mishandling of Matt Lodge.

"The NRL were embarrassed by their and Broncos' handling of the Matt Lodge incident and it appears Jack has paid a higher price for that," he said on Sunday. But the NRL denied Furner's comments and said every incident was judged on a case-by-case basis.

Read more: https://www.canberratimes.com.au/sport/ ... 4zri9.html
Image
LastRaider
John Ferguson
Posts: 2383
Joined: March 31, 2018, 9:30 pm

Re: NRL ban Jack Wighton for 10 matches, impose $30,000 fine

Post by LastRaider »

Someone tell Don to pull his head in. Picking the wrong fight


Sent from my iPhone using The Greenhouse
User avatar
greeneyed
Don Furner
Posts: 145324
Joined: January 7, 2005, 4:21 pm

Re: NRL ban Jack Wighton for 10 matches, impose $30,000 fine

Post by greeneyed »

I'd say the NRL's decision has to do with the Raiders changing their approach to dealing with player misbehaviour... not taking the matter seriously enough... and not agreeing an appropriate penalty with the NRL before going out and announcing one. I do not understand why the Raiders are taking this approach. The penalty they proposed was too light, the NRL appropriately reined them in and over-ruled their decision. And, to be honest, we're lucky it wasn't worse.

I don't understand why they are claiming there are inconsistencies either. It was pointed out on the Sunday Footy Show today that Mitchell Pearce got 8 weeks and $125,000 fine for an incident where he was not found guilty of a crime. And they agreed Lodge's crime was far, far, far worse... but he didn't play NRL for two or three years.
Image
User avatar
Dr Zaius
Mal Meninga
Posts: 22916
Joined: April 15, 2007, 11:03 am
Location: Queensland somewhere

Re: NRL ban Jack Wighton for 10 matches, impose $30,000 fine

Post by Dr Zaius »

Shut up Don
User avatar
Lucy
Brett Mullins
Posts: 1258
Joined: June 24, 2017, 8:47 pm
Favourite Player: Tarps

Re: NRL ban Jack Wighton for 10 matches, impose $30,000 fine

Post by Lucy »

Yes, Don. Jack is the innocent one here. He is the poor victim in all of this.

What an embarrassment this club has become. On and off the field. An absolute shambles coached by dribbling, out of touch idiots, run by dribbling, out of touch idiots, managed by dribbling, out of touch idiots.

Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk

User avatar
Dr Zaius
Mal Meninga
Posts: 22916
Joined: April 15, 2007, 11:03 am
Location: Queensland somewhere

Re: NRL ban Jack Wighton for 10 matches, impose $30,000 fine

Post by Dr Zaius »

Shut up Lucy
Green eyed Mick
Laurie Daley
Posts: 13407
Joined: February 26, 2010, 6:01 pm
Favourite Player: Brett Mullins
Location: Canberra :(

Re: NRL ban Jack Wighton for 10 matches, impose $30,000 fine

Post by Green eyed Mick »

It's a very strange strategy from the club but a lot of what they do makes no sense
User avatar
Yap
Brett Mullins
Posts: 1162
Joined: May 2, 2009, 9:29 pm
Favourite Player: Dave Leave Nothing In The Tank Shillington
Location: Gold Coast

Re: NRL ban Jack Wighton for 10 matches, impose $30,000 fine

Post by Yap »

Manchild wrote: July 15, 2018, 11:50 am New signingImage
I have heard that no matter what happens, he gets paid each week
User avatar
BJ
Steve Walters
Posts: 7788
Joined: February 2, 2007, 12:14 pm

Re: NRL ban Jack Wighton for 10 matches, impose $30,000 fine

Post by BJ »

Manchild wrote:New signingImage
Didn’t fool me one bit!!!!

I could tell it was Junior Paulo in headgear straight away.
edwahu

Re: NRL ban Jack Wighton for 10 matches, impose $30,000 fine

Post by edwahu »

I'd say the club has lost the plot, but I think it's more likely they are following some bizzare plot they have made up on their own.
Old School Green
Dean Lance
Posts: 848
Joined: May 9, 2007, 11:20 am

Re: NRL ban Jack Wighton for 10 matches, impose $30,000 fine

Post by Old School Green »

I support the club with this. I say good on them. In my opinion the people on here who are calling for the club to sack Jack would be the first to blow up royal when the NRL re registered him with another club following a period of exile and a slew of 'changed man' 'I've learned my lesson' garbage news article in the Tele.
He would then carve up, carve us up, and it would be déjà vu for us whilst we all sit around bemoaning the situation and waxing lyrical about how he shouldn't have been re registered. Once (or several in our case) bitten, twice shy.
Clearly he has screwed up; clearly he is paying a penalty both professionally and legally and clearly he will make some type of approach to his victims (if he hasn't already) through a restorative process.
He is a young bloke, on the drink and he made really poor choices. Happens every weekend across the country. I'll save my judgement for how he responds. If he learns his lesson ala the Punter Ponting's of the world then that's all you can ask. If he doesn't, well he can face further consequences and deservedly so.But good on Dr Hawke et al for once for 1. Putting the club's interest first (they are the board tasked with this after all) 2. Standing up to the inconsistent and canberra-dismissive NRL who have little to no care for the raiders and their supporters and who have treated this club with borderline contempt for as long as I can remember.
6 weeks; 30k; undoubtedly a truckload of comm service and who knows what else from the court sounds more than fair to me.
I feel for the blokes who copped a belting but another four games on the sidelines is doing nothing for them. Let them see justice in the courts like all citizens have to.
87, 89, 90, 91, 94, 19
I was there. Go the Milk !!
User avatar
Roger Kenworthy
Laurie Daley
Posts: 11578
Joined: January 7, 2005, 10:18 pm
Favourite Player: Ruben Wiki, J-Lo, Jordan Rapana

Re: NRL ban Jack Wighton for 10 matches, impose $30,000 fine

Post by Roger Kenworthy »

Manchild wrote: July 15, 2018, 11:50 am New signingImage
"Win or lose I still get paid....... twice"

Image
User avatar
Schifty
Laurie Daley
Posts: 16467
Joined: March 14, 2010, 4:00 pm
Favourite Player: Josh Hodgson

Re: NRL ban Jack Wighton for 10 matches, impose $30,000 fine

Post by Schifty »

Tim Gavel


@TimGavel
2h2 hours ago
More
Raiders CEO Don Furner re Jack Wighton says Jack has paid the price following the fall out from the Broncos and the NRL’s handling of the Matt Lodge incident . Don Furner says he is happy to go on record with that assertion.
I've defended Don a lot in the past but seriously What on Earth is going on here????

Can we please just STFU and accept the decision? None of this is going to make it better.

Was our PR strategy cooked up at 130 AM after drinks at the QBN leagues club??
Last edited by Schifty on July 15, 2018, 9:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
VictorTheViking
Ricky Stuart
Posts: 9619
Joined: January 18, 2005, 6:35 pm
Location: Lismore NSW

Re: NRL ban Jack Wighton for 10 matches, impose $30,000 fine

Post by VictorTheViking »

Jesus rothfield dribbles some ****, who cares if wighton is getting paid whilst suspended....hes on a contract...numpty

Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk

User avatar
greeneyed
Don Furner
Posts: 145324
Joined: January 7, 2005, 4:21 pm

Re: NRL ban Jack Wighton for 10 matches, impose $30,000 fine

Post by greeneyed »

Old School Green wrote: July 15, 2018, 9:01 pm I support the club with this. I say good on them. In my opinion the people on here who are calling for the club to sack Jack would be the first to blow up royal when the NRL re registered him with another club following a period of exile and a slew of 'changed man' 'I've learned my lesson' garbage news article in the Tele.
He would then carve up, carve us up, and it would be déjà vu for us whilst we all sit around bemoaning the situation and waxing lyrical about how he shouldn't have been re registered. Once (or several in our case) bitten, twice shy.
Clearly he has screwed up; clearly he is paying a penalty both professionally and legally and clearly he will make some type of approach to his victims (if he hasn't already) through a restorative process.
He is a young bloke, on the drink and he made really poor choices. Happens every weekend across the country. I'll save my judgement for how he responds. If he learns his lesson ala the Punter Ponting's of the world then that's all you can ask. If he doesn't, well he can face further consequences and deservedly so.But good on Dr Hawke et al for once for 1. Putting the club's interest first (they are the board tasked with this after all) 2. Standing up to the inconsistent and canberra-dismissive NRL who have little to no care for the raiders and their supporters and who have treated this club with borderline contempt for as long as I can remember.
6 weeks; 30k; undoubtedly a truckload of comm service and who knows what else from the court sounds more than fair to me.
I feel for the blokes who copped a belting but another four games on the sidelines is doing nothing for them. Let them see justice in the courts like all citizens have to.
I’m certainly not calling for his sacking. The people who are... well they’re entitled to their opinion, but some of them are simply wanting to see him sacked as they either bizarrely dislike the player or dislike what he takes of the salary cap. At least one of them is extremely rude, hateful, and I’d rather walk over hot coals than read what he says on the forum. Sadly I have to as a moderator.
Image
User avatar
Lucy
Brett Mullins
Posts: 1258
Joined: June 24, 2017, 8:47 pm
Favourite Player: Tarps

Re: NRL ban Jack Wighton for 10 matches, impose $30,000 fine

Post by Lucy »

Old School Green wrote:I support the club with this. I say good on them. In my opinion the people on here who are calling for the club to sack Jack would be the first to blow up royal when the NRL re registered him with another club following a period of exile and a slew of 'changed man' 'I've learned my lesson' garbage news article in the Tele.
He would then carve up, carve us up, and it would be déjà vu for us whilst we all sit around bemoaning the situation and waxing lyrical about how he shouldn't have been re registered. Once (or several in our case) bitten, twice shy.
Clearly he has screwed up; clearly he is paying a penalty both professionally and legally and clearly he will make some type of approach to his victims (if he hasn't already) through a restorative process.
He is a young bloke, on the drink and he made really poor choices. Happens every weekend across the country. I'll save my judgement for how he responds. If he learns his lesson ala the Punter Ponting's of the world then that's all you can ask. If he doesn't, well he can face further consequences and deservedly so.But good on Dr Hawke et al for once for 1. Putting the club's interest first (they are the board tasked with this after all) 2. Standing up to the inconsistent and canberra-dismissive NRL who have little to no care for the raiders and their supporters and who have treated this club with borderline contempt for as long as I can remember.
6 weeks; 30k; undoubtedly a truckload of comm service and who knows what else from the court sounds more than fair to me.
I feel for the blokes who copped a belting but another four games on the sidelines is doing nothing for them. Let them see justice in the courts like all citizens have to.
Nope. I'm 100% in the "Jack can line up for anyone other than us and I'll be over the moon" corner.

Jack is a spud. Both on and off the field. Your assumption that we are all mindless fools who cry about the hardship faced by the club is somewhat naive. Most of us know the strict line taken by the club in the past, and that has always been something of a unicorn in regards to respecting club management, there is not much to respect. But now they have gone and put their eggs in the defend Jack basket and lost all credibility.

Deadset, the sooner this club is relocated, the sooner I can quit following rugby league at all levels (The Raiders are literally the only game I watch now) and put all my attention into amazingly run sports, not some back of bourke, country bumpkin, spud league like the NRL.

Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk

User avatar
Lucy
Brett Mullins
Posts: 1258
Joined: June 24, 2017, 8:47 pm
Favourite Player: Tarps

Re: NRL ban Jack Wighton for 10 matches, impose $30,000 fine

Post by Lucy »

Awww.. GE was talking about me up there.

Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk

User avatar
kiwi raider
Steve Walters
Posts: 7680
Joined: March 31, 2008, 7:59 pm
Location: Christchurch, NZ

Re: NRL ban Jack Wighton for 10 matches, impose $30,000 fine

Post by kiwi raider »

VictorTheViking wrote: July 15, 2018, 9:33 pm Jesus rothfield dribbles some ****, who cares if wighton is getting paid whilst suspended....hes on a contract...numpty

Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk
The guy has no idea, he’s saying wighton will take home 250k while suspended, if he earns 250k every 10 weeks then that makes him the highest paid player in the game. Muppet
User avatar
-TW-
Mal Meninga
Posts: 35427
Joined: July 2, 2007, 11:41 am

Re: NRL ban Jack Wighton for 10 matches, impose $30,000 fine

Post by -TW- »

No wonder our cap is **** if we're paying him 1.3mil a season
User avatar
Northern Raider
Mal Meninga
Posts: 32572
Joined: June 19, 2007, 8:17 am
Favourite Player: Dean Lance
Location: Greener pastures

Re: NRL ban Jack Wighton for 10 matches, impose $30,000 fine

Post by Northern Raider »

LastRaider wrote: July 15, 2018, 6:52 pm Someone tell Don to pull his head in. Picking the wrong fight
Yep, not going to win this one. Unless there’s some ulterior motive I’m very disappointed the club is making these kinds of noises.
* The author assumes no responsibility for the topicality, correctness, completeness or quality of information provided.
Locked