irvste wrote:Aww come on pigman don't let the team down again...I've only posted a few times and its so far mostly for your posts as much as I like matts ..and he did welcome me too
I'll deliver tonight. Just for you, old friend
Moderator: GH Moderators
irvste wrote:Aww come on pigman don't let the team down again...I've only posted a few times and its so far mostly for your posts as much as I like matts ..and he did welcome me too
Link them!greeneyed wrote:I laughed out loud. Honestly. And the people in this pub are wondering why.
Sent from my iPhone using The Greenhouse mobile app powered by Tapatalk
We're gonna lose 40-10.. book itCJ42 wrote:This knights squad is worse than their two squads we played last year. It SHOULD be a blood bath.
We should be running all over lamb and feeney all game.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Safety bet on knights 13+-TW- wrote:We're gonna lose 40-10.. book itCJ42 wrote:This knights squad is worse than their two squads we played last year. It SHOULD be a blood bath.
We should be running all over lamb and feeney all game.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Haha yepArcher wrote: You had a lot of material to work with this week Pig so i was expecting top shelf stuff and boy did you deliver. Favourite moments were Soli V SMat, Bateman V make believe, stealing Tapine and 90's Magpies vs 2017 Knights.
We are absolutely no chance this week.
Yep, and what happened on the weekend? He skooled us!Northern Raider wrote:Tells him to watch more footy.Matt wrote:Watch more footy then mate.Notaroboticfish wrote:**** me, Brock Lamb!? Luke Yates would be making a Who the **** is this ****? if I did it
Sent from my iPad using The Greenhouse mobile app powered by Tapatalk
Stone and Yates look solid finds. Probably going to be in the realm of Priest, Bateman, Fensom types - as in solid FGer's, but not rep level. Guys Brown doesn't have to worry about until he has pugged a for more holes, spine esp.
Rates Brock Lamb over Blake Austin because of Try Assist stats.
Nearly right TW-TW- wrote:We're gonna lose 40-10.. book itCJ42 wrote:This knights squad is worse than their two squads we played last year. It SHOULD be a blood bath.
We should be running all over lamb and feeney all game.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Peter Mat, and Ross Dog for the W.greeneyed wrote:In hindsight, how would the skins change for the Knights game? I reckon the Knights would be awarded even more skins.
CJR wrote:All I'm going to say is I respect all of the Eels players and hope they have a fun time out on the field
(please don't sling **** at their players and voodoo them into motm performances in here like every week. It's getting scary)
Sent from my SM-G925I using The Greenhouse mobile app powered by Tapatalk
Its actually a tougher call than u think.Archer wrote:Matt, just out of curiosity who do you give the skin to between Sezer and Moses assuming he does in fact run out for them?
pickles wrote:Matt, do us all a favor and give every skin to the eels! Our players have talent but on current form there's not many players worse!
Advantage? More like clawed one back. You're still down 2 sets and at 2-5 in the 3rd.Matt wrote:Yep, and what happened on the weekend? He skooled us!Northern Raider wrote:Tells him to watch more footy.Matt wrote:Watch more footy then mate.Notaroboticfish wrote:**** me, Brock Lamb!? Luke Yates would be making a Who the **** is this ****? if I did it
Sent from my iPad using The Greenhouse mobile app powered by Tapatalk
Stone and Yates look solid finds. Probably going to be in the realm of Priest, Bateman, Fensom types - as in solid FGer's, but not rep level. Guys Brown doesn't have to worry about until he has pugged a for more holes, spine esp.
Rates Brock Lamb over Blake Austin because of Try Assist stats.
Advantage Matt
Actually I'm not sure i disagree. If it was based purely on stats alone then i think Sezer takes it, 11 missed tackles are pretty important on their own as I'd be interested to know how many of those have led to a try (either directly or on the back of a LB from that missed tackle). The TA's surprise me, i would have guessed more than that had you asked me. That said I wouldn't be surprised in the slightest if both of those stats look very different come the end of the seasonMatt wrote:Its actually a tougher call than u think.Archer wrote:Matt, just out of curiosity who do you give the skin to between Sezer and Moses assuming he does in fact run out for them?
On a quick look, Sezers 10 TAs to 2 is a big one, and Sezers 11 fewer missed tackles is a plus.
Moses has more than twice the kick meters. He has more than 100m more running meters. Also made 30 more tackles - more traffic comes his way, so 11 more missed for 30 more made is a bit each way. Moses also has 3 tries.
Both are pretty reasonable goal kickers too.
Sezer is the steady choice. Moses the more dynamic, but also potentially a liability.
TBH, right now id take a punt on Moses. Change of scenery, better supporting crew. More upside.
If u look up Foxspots lab u can find out the LB and Try causes. Id say they are high for Moses, but its a guess.Archer wrote:Actually I'm not sure i disagree. If it was based purely on stats alone then i think Sezer takes it, 11 missed tackles are pretty important on their own as I'd be interested to know how many of those have led to a try (either directly or on the back of a LB from that missed tackle). The TA's surprise me, i would have guessed more than that had you asked me. That said I wouldn't be surprised in the slightest if both of those stats look very different come the end of the seasonMatt wrote:Its actually a tougher call than u think.Archer wrote:Matt, just out of curiosity who do you give the skin to between Sezer and Moses assuming he does in fact run out for them?
On a quick look, Sezers 10 TAs to 2 is a big one, and Sezers 11 fewer missed tackles is a plus.
Moses has more than twice the kick meters. He has more than 100m more running meters. Also made 30 more tackles - more traffic comes his way, so 11 more missed for 30 more made is a bit each way. Moses also has 3 tries.
Both are pretty reasonable goal kickers too.
Sezer is the steady choice. Moses the more dynamic, but also potentially a liability.
TBH, right now id take a punt on Moses. Change of scenery, better supporting crew. More upside.