Yep, I agree with Matt's position on Dak (thanks for sharing it). Its a lot to do with timing of his deal as the Cowboys are limited on options. A lot of top QBs are winding down their career (Brady, Brees, Rivers) and the other talent on the market is a step down from Dak (Tannehill, Winston etc). Means they will have to cough up the big $$ to keep him. He'll be over paid but the alternatives for the Cowboys are less desirable.Botman wrote: ↑February 24, 2020, 2:40 pmI think they put that notice as a outline of the proposal, but i dont think they'd bother to try and outline that level of the proposal unless they felt it was a deal with really considering. So a little of both? They want their members informed with a succinct summary of what the deal includes but negotiations have been ongoing for over a year now and this is the first proposal they've outlined to their players like this, so that probably indicates that the NFLPA feel this deal is worth taking to a vote.Northern Raider wrote: ↑February 24, 2020, 2:31 pm Thanks Pig. I'm hearing a lot of problems but is that notice from the NFLPA the position they are taking or does it outline to content of the proposal?
Also while you're there can you give me Matt's opinion on the next contract for Dak?
Matt's going to feel bad about the next Dak contract because it's going to make him the highest paid QB in the NFL, and he isnt the best. But the option of letting Dak walk and trying to get lucky in the draft again, or taking a swing at one of the veteran guys is not worth it.
So Matt, like Jerreh is going to hold his nose and accept the deal to make Dak the highest paid player in the NFL.
Their only other course of action is to trade. There are a number of decent QBs who probably need to separate from their current team (Stafford, Carr come to mind). Even take a flyer on some young, talented guys who may need a reboot (Trubisky, Dalton). Neither is ideal, which further highlights the position of strength for Dak in his negotiations.