2016 US Elections
Moderator: GH Moderators
Re: 2016 US Elections
I'd say the far left are just as responsible for Trumps rise as the far right are.
I bow down to thee oh great Nickman, the wisest of the wise, your political adroitness is unsurpassed, your sagacity is unmatched, your wisdom shines through on this forum amongst us mere mortals as bright as your scalp under the light of a full moon, never shall I doubt your analytical prowess again. You are my hero, my lord, my savior, may you accept my offerings so you continue to bless us with your genius.
Re: 2016 US Elections
Well it seems we are now one attack ad away from Trump coming out and saying he ****** Cruz's wife.
Re: 2016 US Elections
i don't think Trump tweets at a presidential level.
Son, we live in a world that has forums, and those forums have to be guarded by Mods. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Nickman? I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. You weep for Lucy, and you curse GE. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know -- that GE’s moderation, while tragic, probably saved lives; and my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, keeps threads on track and under the appropriately sized, highlighted green headings.
You want moderation because deep down in places you don't talk about at parties, you want me on that forum -- you need me on that forum. We use words like "stay on topic," "use the appropriate forum," "please delete." We use these words as the backbone of a life spent defending something. You use them as a punch line. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very moderation that I provide and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather that you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest you get a green handle and edit a post. Either way, I don't give a DAMN what you think about moderation.
Re: 2016 US Elections
If he becomes President there is a chance he'll declare war with Putin over twitter..T_R wrote:i don't think Trump tweets at a presidential level.
Re: 2016 US Elections
I'm going to need a coffee or some stuff from Manbush with this breaking news..
http://heavy.com/news/2016/03/ted-cruz- ... carpenter/
http://heavy.com/news/2016/03/ted-cruz- ... carpenter/
Re: 2016 US Elections
24000 signatures on peitition to allows guns at Republican National Convention.
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016 ... are_btn_tw
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016 ... are_btn_tw
Last edited by Schifty on March 27, 2016, 4:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: 2016 US Elections
Can only hope that they do us all a favour and allow it in the hope that someone gets trigger happy
Re: 2016 US Elections
To be fair shifty, you could probably get 2000 rednecks from qld to sign a petition to allow guns at the equivalent Australian convention (which would be the same proportion to total populations).
So of all the stats/facts that highlight america's issues with gun control, this is not the best one.
So of all the stats/facts that highlight america's issues with gun control, this is not the best one.
Re: 2016 US Elections
the bone wrote:To be fair shifty, you could probably get 2000 rednecks from qld to sign a petition to allow guns at the equivalent Australian convention (which would be the same proportion to total populations).
So of all the stats/facts that highlight america's issues with gun control, this is not the best one.
I actually don't think you would find that.
Even if you went to the far North Queensland I don't think you would find people who would want to take their gun to a Bob Kattar event. I don't even think you'd find many that would want to openly carry them down the street.
Then again the only person from North Queensland I know is the ultra left wing Nickman...
Re: 2016 US Elections
I guess my point is, 24000 out of 300 million isn't really that muchSchifty wrote:the bone wrote:To be fair shifty, you could probably get 2000 rednecks from qld to sign a petition to allow guns at the equivalent Australian convention (which would be the same proportion to total populations).
So of all the stats/facts that highlight america's issues with gun control, this is not the best one.
I actually don't think you would find that.
Even if you went to the far North Queensland I don't think you would find people who would want to take their gun to a Bob Kattar event. I don't even think you'd find many that would want to openly carry them down the street.
Then again the only person from North Queensland I know is the ultra left wing Nickman...
-
- Laurie Daley
- Posts: 13407
- Joined: February 26, 2010, 6:01 pm
- Favourite Player: Brett Mullins
- Location: Canberra :(
Re: 2016 US Elections
http://www.isidewith.com/
Pretty cool website. No surprises. I am 97% compatible with Sanders. 27% with Trump and is last Cruz with 22%.
They have one for Australia as well.
https://australia.isidewith.com/political-quiz
Pretty cool website. No surprises. I am 97% compatible with Sanders. 27% with Trump and is last Cruz with 22%.
They have one for Australia as well.
https://australia.isidewith.com/political-quiz
Re: 2016 US Elections
As we would all expect, I am a far better rounded individual than GEM;
Sanders 90%
Clinton 88%
Trump 59%
Cruz 31%
Sanders 90%
Clinton 88%
Trump 59%
Cruz 31%
Son, we live in a world that has forums, and those forums have to be guarded by Mods. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Nickman? I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. You weep for Lucy, and you curse GE. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know -- that GE’s moderation, while tragic, probably saved lives; and my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, keeps threads on track and under the appropriately sized, highlighted green headings.
You want moderation because deep down in places you don't talk about at parties, you want me on that forum -- you need me on that forum. We use words like "stay on topic," "use the appropriate forum," "please delete." We use these words as the backbone of a life spent defending something. You use them as a punch line. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very moderation that I provide and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather that you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest you get a green handle and edit a post. Either way, I don't give a DAMN what you think about moderation.
Re: 2016 US Elections
On the Australian one, I am apparently
84% Labor
74% Liberal
60% Green
84% Labor
74% Liberal
60% Green
Son, we live in a world that has forums, and those forums have to be guarded by Mods. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Nickman? I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. You weep for Lucy, and you curse GE. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know -- that GE’s moderation, while tragic, probably saved lives; and my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, keeps threads on track and under the appropriately sized, highlighted green headings.
You want moderation because deep down in places you don't talk about at parties, you want me on that forum -- you need me on that forum. We use words like "stay on topic," "use the appropriate forum," "please delete." We use these words as the backbone of a life spent defending something. You use them as a punch line. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very moderation that I provide and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather that you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest you get a green handle and edit a post. Either way, I don't give a DAMN what you think about moderation.
Re: 2016 US Elections
So you're a fence sitter? Or is that a reflection of the two major parties being super similar?T_R wrote:On the Australian one, I am apparently
84% Labor
74% Liberal
60% Green
'I've got 17 blokes in that dressing room that are hurting'
Re: 2016 US Elections
I'm fairly sure I'm not a fence sitterToviii wrote:So you're a fence sitter? Or is that a reflection of the two major parties being super similar?T_R wrote:On the Australian one, I am apparently
84% Labor
74% Liberal
60% Green
I normally tend towards Labor (or even to the left of them) on most social issues, and am fairly strongly the other way on economic stuff. I think that came out fairly clearly in the survey.
What I'm NOT is 60% Green, in that I have, you know, a job. And shower a bit.
Son, we live in a world that has forums, and those forums have to be guarded by Mods. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Nickman? I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. You weep for Lucy, and you curse GE. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know -- that GE’s moderation, while tragic, probably saved lives; and my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, keeps threads on track and under the appropriately sized, highlighted green headings.
You want moderation because deep down in places you don't talk about at parties, you want me on that forum -- you need me on that forum. We use words like "stay on topic," "use the appropriate forum," "please delete." We use these words as the backbone of a life spent defending something. You use them as a punch line. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very moderation that I provide and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather that you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest you get a green handle and edit a post. Either way, I don't give a DAMN what you think about moderation.
Re: 2016 US Elections
T_R wrote:I'm fairly sure I'm not a fence sitterToviii wrote:So you're a fence sitter? Or is that a reflection of the two major parties being super similar?T_R wrote:On the Australian one, I am apparently
84% Labor
74% Liberal
60% Green
I normally tend towards Labor (or even to the left of them) on most social issues, and am fairly strongly the other way on economic stuff. I think that came out fairly clearly in the survey.
What I'm NOT is 60% Green, in that I have, you know, a job. And shower a bit.
Agreed, you're at least 75% Greens
#TRlefty
Re: 2016 US Elections
Bernie 97%
Clinton 97%
Trump 33%
Cruz 28%
Surprised Clinton, Trump and Cruz were so high
Side note I see Bernie's been winning a lot lately.
Clinton 97%
Trump 33%
Cruz 28%
Surprised Clinton, Trump and Cruz were so high
Side note I see Bernie's been winning a lot lately.
I bow down to thee oh great Nickman, the wisest of the wise, your political adroitness is unsurpassed, your sagacity is unmatched, your wisdom shines through on this forum amongst us mere mortals as bright as your scalp under the light of a full moon, never shall I doubt your analytical prowess again. You are my hero, my lord, my savior, may you accept my offerings so you continue to bless us with your genius.
Re: 2016 US Elections
He has been doing well lately! For some reason Clinton was slightly higher for me when I tried the quiz. Both Clinton and Sanders were high 90s though.
Greens and Labor drammatically outweighed the LNP in the Australian one, so definitely not similar :p
Greens and Labor drammatically outweighed the LNP in the Australian one, so definitely not similar :p
'I've got 17 blokes in that dressing room that are hurting'
Re: 2016 US Elections
Ouch I feel dirty
Greens 87%
Labor 78%
Liberals 44%
Greens 87%
Labor 78%
Liberals 44%
I bow down to thee oh great Nickman, the wisest of the wise, your political adroitness is unsurpassed, your sagacity is unmatched, your wisdom shines through on this forum amongst us mere mortals as bright as your scalp under the light of a full moon, never shall I doubt your analytical prowess again. You are my hero, my lord, my savior, may you accept my offerings so you continue to bless us with your genius.
- gangrenous
- Laurie Daley
- Posts: 16705
- Joined: May 12, 2007, 10:42 pm
Re: 2016 US Elections
Labor 88%
Greens 85%
Liberal 14%
No enormous surprises there.
Greens 85%
Liberal 14%
No enormous surprises there.
-
- Mal Meninga
- Posts: 51208
- Joined: June 25, 2012, 9:53 am
- Favourite Player: Hodgo
- Location: Rockhampton, Central Queensland
Re: 2016 US Elections
Ugh, I am 88% Green, 75% Labor, 53% Liberal.
Someone kill me now.
Someone kill me now.
Re: 2016 US Elections
Guys! We can all vote Greens together now!
'I've got 17 blokes in that dressing room that are hurting'
-
- Mal Meninga
- Posts: 51208
- Joined: June 25, 2012, 9:53 am
- Favourite Player: Hodgo
- Location: Rockhampton, Central Queensland
Re: 2016 US Elections
This is crazy
Re: 2016 US Elections
Does it scare you our results are so close ?The Nickman wrote:This is crazy
I bow down to thee oh great Nickman, the wisest of the wise, your political adroitness is unsurpassed, your sagacity is unmatched, your wisdom shines through on this forum amongst us mere mortals as bright as your scalp under the light of a full moon, never shall I doubt your analytical prowess again. You are my hero, my lord, my savior, may you accept my offerings so you continue to bless us with your genius.
-
- Mal Meninga
- Posts: 51208
- Joined: June 25, 2012, 9:53 am
- Favourite Player: Hodgo
- Location: Rockhampton, Central Queensland
Re: 2016 US Elections
Makes me want to top myself.
Re: 2016 US Elections
Clinton 98%
Sanders 98%
Trump 15%
Cruz 15%
60% for whoever the hell Gary Johnson is.
Sanders 98%
Trump 15%
Cruz 15%
60% for whoever the hell Gary Johnson is.
-
- Mal Meninga
- Posts: 51208
- Joined: June 25, 2012, 9:53 am
- Favourite Player: Hodgo
- Location: Rockhampton, Central Queensland
Re: 2016 US Elections
He's a gay pornstarSchifty wrote:Clinton 98%
Sanders 98%
Trump 15%
Cruz 15%
60% for whoever the hell Gary Johnson is.
Re: 2016 US Elections
15% Cruz and Trump, I'm so jealous Schifty
I bow down to thee oh great Nickman, the wisest of the wise, your political adroitness is unsurpassed, your sagacity is unmatched, your wisdom shines through on this forum amongst us mere mortals as bright as your scalp under the light of a full moon, never shall I doubt your analytical prowess again. You are my hero, my lord, my savior, may you accept my offerings so you continue to bless us with your genius.
Re: 2016 US Elections
Manbush wrote:15% Cruz and Trump, I'm so jealous Schifty
that 15% still makes me feel dirty.
Anyway for Auspol I got
91% Green
81% Labor
16% Liberal
Re: 2016 US Elections
So, politically speaking, you're perpetually 19 years old, lying around in your filthy sharehouse, smoking pot and bitching about Centrelink to GEM.Schifty wrote:Manbush wrote:15% Cruz and Trump, I'm so jealous Schifty
that 15% still makes me feel dirty.
Anyway for Auspol I got
91% Green
81% Labor
16% Liberal
Son, we live in a world that has forums, and those forums have to be guarded by Mods. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Nickman? I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. You weep for Lucy, and you curse GE. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know -- that GE’s moderation, while tragic, probably saved lives; and my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, keeps threads on track and under the appropriately sized, highlighted green headings.
You want moderation because deep down in places you don't talk about at parties, you want me on that forum -- you need me on that forum. We use words like "stay on topic," "use the appropriate forum," "please delete." We use these words as the backbone of a life spent defending something. You use them as a punch line. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very moderation that I provide and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather that you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest you get a green handle and edit a post. Either way, I don't give a DAMN what you think about moderation.
Re: 2016 US Elections
T_R wrote:So, politically speaking, you're perpetually 19 years old, lying around in your filthy sharehouse, smoking pot and bitching about Centrelink to GEM.Schifty wrote:Manbush wrote:15% Cruz and Trump, I'm so jealous Schifty
that 15% still makes me feel dirty.
Anyway for Auspol I got
91% Green
81% Labor
16% Liberal
I think the putting some social issues as most important skewed that.
I actually said marijuana should only be legalised for medical use so stunned that didn't drop the greens vote.
Re: 2016 US Elections
**** did I just read, supposedly when Swanson introduced Cruz the other day he mentioned the bible verse where homosexuals are worthy of death
I know evangelicals are against homosexuality but seriously do they really want to hear that
I know evangelicals are against homosexuality but seriously do they really want to hear that
I bow down to thee oh great Nickman, the wisest of the wise, your political adroitness is unsurpassed, your sagacity is unmatched, your wisdom shines through on this forum amongst us mere mortals as bright as your scalp under the light of a full moon, never shall I doubt your analytical prowess again. You are my hero, my lord, my savior, may you accept my offerings so you continue to bless us with your genius.
Re: 2016 US Elections
90% Greens
71% ALP
57% LNP
I feel dirty.
71% ALP
57% LNP
I feel dirty.
Re: 2016 US Elections
One post on this only as I don't want to derail the thread.Schifty wrote:
I actually said marijuana should only be legalised for medical use so stunned that didn't drop the greens vote.
Schifty must say I'm surprised and disappointed, with even the UNs experts calling for all drugs to be legalised/decriminalised in their members countries, the examples around the world of it working etc that someone like yourself would vote against even pot, guess the experts have a long way to go if even you are against it
TR, Nickman and co troll away, I'll ignore
I bow down to thee oh great Nickman, the wisest of the wise, your political adroitness is unsurpassed, your sagacity is unmatched, your wisdom shines through on this forum amongst us mere mortals as bright as your scalp under the light of a full moon, never shall I doubt your analytical prowess again. You are my hero, my lord, my savior, may you accept my offerings so you continue to bless us with your genius.