The Greenhouse

Oh God ..... I'm Crusher

dubby wrote:

T_R wrote:Ive got an out-of-left-field theory that the buildings went down as a result of two large planes flying into them.

Manbush wrote:

Dr Zaius wrote:Can TR be a verb for conspiracy loving crackpot?

And greens voter

Ooooof!

Manbush wrote:

Dr Zaius wrote:Can TR be a verb for conspiracy loving crackpot?

And greens voter

Hang on, you're thinking of albi

Nope TR voted Greens Dubby, he's turned!

Manbush wrote:Nope TR voted Greens Dubby, he's turned!

Manbush is right.

I've heard rumours that TR has been having lunch with left wing political antagonists who are trying to destabilise the Abbott government...

Schifty wrote:Manbush is right.

I've heard rumours that TR has been having lunch with left wing political antagonists who are trying to destabilise the Abbott government...

I was just taken with their good looks and charm

dubby wrote:

Manbush wrote:Nope TR voted Greens Dubby, he's turned!

T_R wrote:

Schifty wrote:Manbush is right.

I've heard rumours that TR has been having lunch with left wing political antagonists who are trying to destabilise the Abbott government...

I was just taken with their good looks and charm

Better not start leaking info.

This popper up on my fb feed today.. I must have become friends with Crusher without knowing.

Oh bollocks, he wasn't 'paid double' and he didn't 'win'.

He was paid $4.1 billion in an out of court settlement (not covering either full loss or rebuilding costs) after the insurance companies tried to pay $2.8 Billion, the limit imposed by a judge for a 'single' incident. Silverstein's company is still massively out of pocket.

Nickman had a Facebook post dealing with almost exactly this kind of graphic the other day.

Hahahahaha God I love this ****

People are SO STUPID

I bought a new house for $500k and then torched it. The insurance company would only give me $100k for it, so I sued them and got $200k. I doubled my money! I'm a business genius!

winning

I love how because the guy bought insurance on it for terrorism and then there was a terrorist attack it's clearly an inside job

Call a spade a spade here, Nickman. The context here is that he is a rich Jew, thus far more palatable to the conspiracy nuts.

Oh yes the Jewish aspect of 911, on the anniversary saw someone sarcasticly ask how many Jews died and said it was a coincidence, he never replied when I said 400-500 which coincidently was about the same percentage of Jews who worked there meaning Jews die as easily as anyone else.

T_R wrote:Call a spade a spade here, Nickman. The context here is that he is a rich Jew, thus far more palatable to the conspiracy nuts.

STEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEINBERGER!!!!!!!!!

Dr Zaius wrote:I bought a new house for $500k and then torched it. The insurance company would only give me $100k for it, so I sued them and got $200k. I doubled my money! I'm a business genius!

Pure genius Doc. Thats up there with making $100 by not backing the Raiders to make top 8.

Stuff Malcolm Turnbull. Its the GH that will come up with the solutions to fix the economy.

Guys, Guys. If you swap 9 and 11 you get 11/9. Which in American is the 9th of November. Coincidence? I think not.

I guess this is the nut job conspiracy thread?

I present you, random low resolution pixels on Mars= Secret undergroudn bases.

Pffft, that could be anybody's butt in that picture

Seems impossible to debate to me.

Where is crusher?? I'd love to hear his thoughts on the complex Syria situation

The Nickman wrote:Where is crusher?? I'd love to hear his thoughts on the complex Syria situation

Bombs in Syria can't cut beams like that!!!

Syria was an inside job .... NO Jews have been killed in the bombing. Figure THAT out!

I follow this guy's page on facebook just for the gold like this that comes up.


http://undergroundworldnews.com/2016/01 ... ound-scan/

That's satire right? Tell me that's satire.

Dr Zaius wrote:That's satire right? Tell me that's satire.

https://www.facebook.com/TheUnderground ... s/?fref=ts

It's better than the Onion.


ONly it is serious.

Been a while since one of these sprung up.

Former CIA and commercial pilot John Lear has come forward and sworn an affidavit stating that the Twin Towers were not bought to the ground by planes crashing into them.

In his expert opinion the official version of events that claims two planes crashed into the towers is actually “physically impossible.”

With reports from the Kremlin this week that President Putin is ready to release satellite images proving that the Twin Towers were destroyed by “controlled demolition” rather than by the force of two planes, enormous strides towards disproving the official 9/11 Commission version are taking place.

http://yournewswire.com/cia-pilot-swear ... wn-on-911/


The Russians releasing satellite images that prove a demolition is def a new one.

What is he trying to say, that the planes should have somehow bounced off the building and fallen to the ground.

One quick look at the video would seem to show this up as false.

I remember getting a tour of a friends house in chapman that was destroyed in the Canberra bushfires, all that remained was a concrete slab and a sludgy type material about 6 inches deep. Things like the fridge and washing machine simply vaporised in the heat.

This bloke has an opinion



Much the same argument exists for crashing into the building, the steel structure provides vertical rigidity but very little protection against shear.

Please

I beg you.

No.

Schifty wrote:Been a while since one of these sprung up.

Former CIA and commercial pilot John Lear has come forward and sworn an affidavit stating that the Twin Towers were not bought to the ground by planes crashing into them.

In his expert opinion the official version of events that claims two planes crashed into the towers is actually “physically impossible.”

With reports from the Kremlin this week that President Putin is ready to release satellite images proving that the Twin Towers were destroyed by “controlled demolition” rather than by the force of two planes, enormous strides towards disproving the official 9/11 Commission version are taking place.

http://yournewswire.com/cia-pilot-swear ... wn-on-911/


The Russians releasing satellite images that prove a demolition is def a new one.

Is this Russian thing an actual thing or is it just another conspiracy nut made up rubbish "fact"??

Nevermind, just Googled it, looks to be completely false BS.

You'll imagine my surprise, of course.