Pray for the Canberra Raiders
Moderator: GH Moderators
-
The Nickman
- Mal Meninga
- Posts: 51449
- Joined: June 25, 2012, 9:53 am
- Favourite Player: Hodgo
- Location: Rockhampton, Central Queensland
Re: Pray for the Canberra Raiders
It was never really a good thread to begin with, GE. Let's be honest here.
Re: Pray for the Canberra Raiders
Surely you don't think that someone logging into an internet rugby league forum with the sole purpose of earning imaginary internet points by trolling complete strangers is in someway unhinged?The Nickman wrote:Honestly, and just between you and I, I seriously worry about his mental health.T_R wrote:You don't find his application of the most pure form of online narcissism somehow compelling?The Nickman wrote:Speak for yourself, pal.T_R wrote:As fascinating as we find Lucy and all his alts, let's save this forum for talking about the Raiders and shift the conversation about GE's religious prejudices and my outright racial separatism to the Lime Lounge, please.
Son, we live in a world that has forums, and those forums have to be guarded by Mods. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Nickman? I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. You weep for Lucy, and you curse GE. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know -- that GE’s moderation, while tragic, probably saved lives; and my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, keeps threads on track and under the appropriately sized, highlighted green headings.
You want moderation because deep down in places you don't talk about at parties, you want me on that forum -- you need me on that forum. We use words like "stay on topic," "use the appropriate forum," "please delete." We use these words as the backbone of a life spent defending something. You use them as a punch line. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very moderation that I provide and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather that you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest you get a green handle and edit a post. Either way, I don't give a DAMN what you think about moderation.
Re: Pray for the Canberra Raiders
I feel that it has settled to it's rightful place at the darkest nether regions of the GH underworld, the Lime Lounge.greeneyed wrote:The thread has jumped the shark. Lime Lounge.
Son, we live in a world that has forums, and those forums have to be guarded by Mods. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Nickman? I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. You weep for Lucy, and you curse GE. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know -- that GE’s moderation, while tragic, probably saved lives; and my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, keeps threads on track and under the appropriately sized, highlighted green headings.
You want moderation because deep down in places you don't talk about at parties, you want me on that forum -- you need me on that forum. We use words like "stay on topic," "use the appropriate forum," "please delete." We use these words as the backbone of a life spent defending something. You use them as a punch line. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very moderation that I provide and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather that you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest you get a green handle and edit a post. Either way, I don't give a DAMN what you think about moderation.
-
The Nickman
- Mal Meninga
- Posts: 51449
- Joined: June 25, 2012, 9:53 am
- Favourite Player: Hodgo
- Location: Rockhampton, Central Queensland
Re: Pray for the Canberra Raiders
Honestly, he just sends alt after alt in to die like the diggers were sent in at Gallipoli.T_R wrote:Surely you don't think that someone logging into an internet rugby league forum with the sole purpose of earning imaginary internet points by trolling complete strangers is in someway unhinged?The Nickman wrote:Honestly, and just between you and I, I seriously worry about his mental health.T_R wrote:You don't find his application of the most pure form of online narcissism somehow compelling?The Nickman wrote:Speak for yourself, pal.T_R wrote:As fascinating as we find Lucy and all his alts, let's save this forum for talking about the Raiders and shift the conversation about GE's religious prejudices and my outright racial separatism to the Lime Lounge, please.
Re: Pray for the Canberra Raiders
I'm concerned for the mental health of 50% of this forum. I include myself in that btw.
Re: Pray for the Canberra Raiders
So the male hairdresser is another fear of yours mixed in with the coloured people.T_R wrote:Sorry, your posts just remind me of a deeply hysterical male hairdresser for some reason.Jeff Steinberger wrote:So, I was Bileduct and now I am this Lucy girl?
Who next?
Anyway.. Let us move to the lime lounge to continue this riveting "who dunnit" TR conspiracy..
I guess you're just naturally a bit shreeky.
My bad.
Let me guess, you are also somewhat afraid of dominant women and chose to marry the submissive stereotypical type?
Re: Pray for the Canberra Raiders
Yes, yes Lucy....we're all looking at you.Jeff Steinberger wrote:So the male hairdresser is another fear of yours mixed in with the coloured people.T_R wrote:Sorry, your posts just remind me of a deeply hysterical male hairdresser for some reason.Jeff Steinberger wrote:So, I was Bileduct and now I am this Lucy girl?
Who next?
Anyway.. Let us move to the lime lounge to continue this riveting "who dunnit" TR conspiracy..
I guess you're just naturally a bit shreeky.
My bad.
Let me guess, you are also somewhat afraid of dominant women and chose to marry the submissive stereotypical type?
You were bottle fed, I take it?
Son, we live in a world that has forums, and those forums have to be guarded by Mods. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Nickman? I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. You weep for Lucy, and you curse GE. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know -- that GE’s moderation, while tragic, probably saved lives; and my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, keeps threads on track and under the appropriately sized, highlighted green headings.
You want moderation because deep down in places you don't talk about at parties, you want me on that forum -- you need me on that forum. We use words like "stay on topic," "use the appropriate forum," "please delete." We use these words as the backbone of a life spent defending something. You use them as a punch line. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very moderation that I provide and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather that you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest you get a green handle and edit a post. Either way, I don't give a DAMN what you think about moderation.
Re: Pray for the Canberra Raiders
Agree with those who believe this is a poor thread and would be happy to see it "win" a "boogs"
Dont delete this GE
-
The Nickman
- Mal Meninga
- Posts: 51449
- Joined: June 25, 2012, 9:53 am
- Favourite Player: Hodgo
- Location: Rockhampton, Central Queensland
Re: Pray for the Canberra Raiders
Jeff Steinberger wrote:So the male hairdresser is another fear of yours mixed in with the coloured people.T_R wrote:Sorry, your posts just remind me of a deeply hysterical male hairdresser for some reason.Jeff Steinberger wrote:So, I was Bileduct and now I am this Lucy girl?
Who next?
Anyway.. Let us move to the lime lounge to continue this riveting "who dunnit" TR conspiracy..
I guess you're just naturally a bit shreeky.
My bad.
Let me guess, you are also somewhat afraid of dominant women and chose to marry the submissive stereotypical type?
Re: Pray for the Canberra Raiders
Wow.Jeff Steinberger wrote:
Let me guess, you are also somewhat afraid of dominant women and chose to marry the submissive stereotypical type?
Actual racism.
Stereotypes indeed.
Great post.
Son, we live in a world that has forums, and those forums have to be guarded by Mods. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Nickman? I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. You weep for Lucy, and you curse GE. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know -- that GE’s moderation, while tragic, probably saved lives; and my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, keeps threads on track and under the appropriately sized, highlighted green headings.
You want moderation because deep down in places you don't talk about at parties, you want me on that forum -- you need me on that forum. We use words like "stay on topic," "use the appropriate forum," "please delete." We use these words as the backbone of a life spent defending something. You use them as a punch line. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very moderation that I provide and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather that you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest you get a green handle and edit a post. Either way, I don't give a DAMN what you think about moderation.
-
Green eyed Mick
- Laurie Daley
- Posts: 13407
- Joined: February 26, 2010, 6:01 pm
- Favourite Player: Brett Mullins
- Location: Canberra :(
Re: Pray for the Canberra Raiders
Racism? How?T_R wrote:Wow.Jeff Steinberger wrote:
Let me guess, you are also somewhat afraid of dominant women and chose to marry the submissive stereotypical type?
Actual racism.
Stereotypes indeed.
Great post.
Care to explain? I just assumed that seeing as you are a bigot, and afraid of males in a female dominated industry that youd be afraid of the opposite also and the dominant woman.
That's not racism last time I checked..
Re: Pray for the Canberra Raiders
Imaginary internet points?T_R wrote:Surely you don't think that someone logging into an internet rugby league forum with the sole purpose of earning imaginary internet points by trolling complete strangers is in someway unhinged?The Nickman wrote:Honestly, and just between you and I, I seriously worry about his mental health.T_R wrote:You don't find his application of the most pure form of online narcissism somehow compelling?The Nickman wrote:Speak for yourself, pal.T_R wrote:As fascinating as we find Lucy and all his alts, let's save this forum for talking about the Raiders and shift the conversation about GE's religious prejudices and my outright racial separatism to the Lime Lounge, please.
This coming from the bloke who boasted about his racist scammer rubbish and then posted it for all and sundry on said internet forum.
Pot, kettle, anyone?
-
dubby
- Don Furner
- Posts: 34156
- Joined: May 16, 2006, 12:14 pm
- Favourite Player: Mal Meninga
- Location: You have never heard of it.
Re: Pray for the Canberra Raiders
Don't pick a fight you can't win, Jeff
The spiral of silence refers to the idea that when people fail to speak, the price of speaking rises. As the price to speak rises, still fewer speak out, which further causes the price to rise, so that fewer people yet will speak out, until a whole culture or nation is silenced. This is what happened in Germany.
If you do not speak, you are not being neutral, but are contributing to the success of the thing you refuse to name and condemn.
If you do not speak, you are not being neutral, but are contributing to the success of the thing you refuse to name and condemn.
Re: Pray for the Canberra Raiders
1/10. Would read again.
'I've got 17 blokes in that dressing room that are hurting'
Re: Pray for the Canberra Raiders
We've definitely bottomed out here
Son, we live in a world that has forums, and those forums have to be guarded by Mods. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Nickman? I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. You weep for Lucy, and you curse GE. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know -- that GE’s moderation, while tragic, probably saved lives; and my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, keeps threads on track and under the appropriately sized, highlighted green headings.
You want moderation because deep down in places you don't talk about at parties, you want me on that forum -- you need me on that forum. We use words like "stay on topic," "use the appropriate forum," "please delete." We use these words as the backbone of a life spent defending something. You use them as a punch line. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very moderation that I provide and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather that you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest you get a green handle and edit a post. Either way, I don't give a DAMN what you think about moderation.
Re: Pray for the Canberra Raiders
Lucky I'm definitely in the sane halfSchifty wrote:I'm concerned for the mental health of 50% of this forum. I include myself in that btw.
'I've got 17 blokes in that dressing room that are hurting'
Re: Pray for the Canberra Raiders
Here comes the cavalry.. Between you and Nickman, TR has his wenches well and truly trained.dubby wrote:Don't pick a fight you can't win, Jeff
Re: Pray for the Canberra Raiders
nope, still drifting southwardsSon, we live in a world that has forums, and those forums have to be guarded by Mods. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Nickman? I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. You weep for Lucy, and you curse GE. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know -- that GE’s moderation, while tragic, probably saved lives; and my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, keeps threads on track and under the appropriately sized, highlighted green headings.
You want moderation because deep down in places you don't talk about at parties, you want me on that forum -- you need me on that forum. We use words like "stay on topic," "use the appropriate forum," "please delete." We use these words as the backbone of a life spent defending something. You use them as a punch line. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very moderation that I provide and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather that you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest you get a green handle and edit a post. Either way, I don't give a DAMN what you think about moderation.
Re: Pray for the Canberra Raiders
dubby wrote:Don't pick a fight you can't win, Jeff
Every time. Dubby comes desperately wading into a fight trying to help when he needs no help.
ATAOATGI
Last edited by Botman on August 21, 2015, 3:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Pray for the Canberra Raiders
It's cute. Leave Dubby bePigman wrote:dubby wrote:Don't pick a fight you can't win, Jeff
Dubby comes desperately wading into a fight trying to help TR in a fight he needs no help in.
ATAOATGI
'I've got 17 blokes in that dressing room that are hurting'
Re: Pray for the Canberra Raiders
You'd be best to avoid the south, too many of dem n****'s down der boy!T_R wrote:
*used for lols and fanboi ratings on an anonymous forum is ok, right TR?
-
The Nickman
- Mal Meninga
- Posts: 51449
- Joined: June 25, 2012, 9:53 am
- Favourite Player: Hodgo
- Location: Rockhampton, Central Queensland
Re: Pray for the Canberra Raiders
Please stop
Re: Pray for the Canberra Raiders
I mean, I know we need to lock the thread, but I cant bring myself to
Son, we live in a world that has forums, and those forums have to be guarded by Mods. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Nickman? I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. You weep for Lucy, and you curse GE. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know -- that GE’s moderation, while tragic, probably saved lives; and my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, keeps threads on track and under the appropriately sized, highlighted green headings.
You want moderation because deep down in places you don't talk about at parties, you want me on that forum -- you need me on that forum. We use words like "stay on topic," "use the appropriate forum," "please delete." We use these words as the backbone of a life spent defending something. You use them as a punch line. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very moderation that I provide and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather that you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest you get a green handle and edit a post. Either way, I don't give a DAMN what you think about moderation.
-
dubby
- Don Furner
- Posts: 34156
- Joined: May 16, 2006, 12:14 pm
- Favourite Player: Mal Meninga
- Location: You have never heard of it.
Re: Pray for the Canberra Raiders
Pigman wrote:dubby wrote:Don't pick a fight you can't win, Jeff
Dubby comes desperately wading into a fight trying to help when he needs no help.
ATAOATGI
The spiral of silence refers to the idea that when people fail to speak, the price of speaking rises. As the price to speak rises, still fewer speak out, which further causes the price to rise, so that fewer people yet will speak out, until a whole culture or nation is silenced. This is what happened in Germany.
If you do not speak, you are not being neutral, but are contributing to the success of the thing you refuse to name and condemn.
If you do not speak, you are not being neutral, but are contributing to the success of the thing you refuse to name and condemn.
Re: Pray for the Canberra Raiders
I've read some stinkers of threads in my time but this one now takes the cake
Re: Pray for the Canberra Raiders
And here comes the second wave..The Nickman wrote:Please stop
What do you get for being such an obedient boy?
Re: Pray for the Canberra Raiders
don't stopSon, we live in a world that has forums, and those forums have to be guarded by Mods. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Nickman? I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. You weep for Lucy, and you curse GE. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know -- that GE’s moderation, while tragic, probably saved lives; and my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, keeps threads on track and under the appropriately sized, highlighted green headings.
You want moderation because deep down in places you don't talk about at parties, you want me on that forum -- you need me on that forum. We use words like "stay on topic," "use the appropriate forum," "please delete." We use these words as the backbone of a life spent defending something. You use them as a punch line. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very moderation that I provide and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather that you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest you get a green handle and edit a post. Either way, I don't give a DAMN what you think about moderation.
Re: Pray for the Canberra Raiders
I have absolutely no intentions to.T_R wrote:
Re: Pray for the Canberra Raiders
Lime Lounge would have to be my favourite part of the GH right now. Far more pleasant to pass the time reading threads like this rather than the 99784th thread about who we should get rid of in the team because we lost yet another 'won' game, don't lock it!
Re: Pray for the Canberra Raiders
It's been fun, but I reckon that might just about do us.
Son, we live in a world that has forums, and those forums have to be guarded by Mods. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Nickman? I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. You weep for Lucy, and you curse GE. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know -- that GE’s moderation, while tragic, probably saved lives; and my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, keeps threads on track and under the appropriately sized, highlighted green headings.
You want moderation because deep down in places you don't talk about at parties, you want me on that forum -- you need me on that forum. We use words like "stay on topic," "use the appropriate forum," "please delete." We use these words as the backbone of a life spent defending something. You use them as a punch line. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very moderation that I provide and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather that you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest you get a green handle and edit a post. Either way, I don't give a DAMN what you think about moderation.