Re: Michael or other lawyers rip this a new one please
Posted: November 11, 2013, 3:49 pm
The link is for photobucket .... not some dodgy pron site etc....Shadow Boxer wrote:It will get flagged in the security filters.
The Greenhouse
The Canberra Raiders Supporters Forum
https://thegh.com.au/forum/
Michael or other lawyers rip this a new one please
Page 6 of 7
Re: Michael or other lawyers rip this a new one please
Posted: November 11, 2013, 3:51 pm
Yeah do regret it due to her being IMO very low risk for high reward, the offer my brothers had on the other hand I wouldn't touch with even Nickmans sperm, much too high a risk.Raider Bell wrote:Fair enough. With the power of hindsight do you feel like it was a good thing you didn't go through with it? Of course, its none of my business and respect if you don't want to answer that.Manbush wrote:Haven't really asked, haven't seen any posts on facebook about her being pregnant so I'm guessing it mightn't have worked, haven't really looked though as might raise some emotions better left burried.
Chick at work has just left on maternity leave (not mine) so has been in the back of my mind since she told me she was pregnant.
Re: Michael or other lawyers rip this a new one please
Posted: November 11, 2013, 4:34 pm
Yeh it's just the amount of flesh colour will get flagged and the. They will look and see I go to the gh 1000 times a dayShezza wrote:The link is for photobucket .... not some dodgy pron site etc....Shadow Boxer wrote:It will get flagged in the security filters.
Re: Michael or other lawyers rip this a new one please
Posted: November 11, 2013, 4:44 pm
Bahahahahahahaha that's awesome!!
Re: Michael or other lawyers rip this a new one please
Posted: November 11, 2013, 4:50 pm
What on earth is he getting out of this?Manbush wrote:Ok, how about finding out off a mate that my brother is considering doin something but 100 times riskier and I'm the one that's gotta try and warn him offShezza wrote:Tell us another story please Manbush....
While I considered mine to be low risk due to her being a wealthy well respected lady in her community who had already raised one quality kid as a solo mum without help and me not having much money to bleed anyway, he's seriously considering it with a pair of bogan, welfare dependent ex drug addict lesbians, one of whom already has two juvenile delinquent kids and has had the hots for him for years, while financially he's currently a lil bit better off than me he is looking at a multi million dollar workers comp lawsuit.
Do they have blackmail material on him?
Re: Michael or other lawyers rip this a new one please
Posted: November 11, 2013, 5:01 pm
What if they were wearing hats??Shadow Boxer wrote:Yeh it's just the amount of flesh colour will get flagged and the. They will look and see I go to the gh 1000 times a dayShezza wrote:The link is for photobucket .... not some dodgy pron site etc....Shadow Boxer wrote:It will get flagged in the security filters.
Re: Michael or other lawyers rip this a new one please
Posted: November 11, 2013, 5:03 pm
I seriously thought about photo shopping hats on to themRe: Michael or other lawyers rip this a new one please
Posted: November 11, 2013, 5:08 pm
Flesh colour? Does this mean you need to stay away from lovely desert panoramas? Or from a photo of a beach with scrolling sand dunes which just scream the colour of a 25-35 year old Caucasian male?Shadow Boxer wrote:Yeh it's just the amount of flesh colour will get flagged and the. They will look and see I go to the gh 1000 times a dayShezza wrote:The link is for photobucket .... not some dodgy pron site etc....Shadow Boxer wrote:It will get flagged in the security filters.
Re: Michael or other lawyers rip this a new one please
Posted: November 11, 2013, 5:29 pm
The tools are pretty sophisticated.Raider Bell wrote:Flesh colour? Does this mean you need to stay away from lovely desert panoramas? Or from a photo of a beach with scrolling sand dunes which just scream the colour of a 25-35 year old Caucasian male?Shadow Boxer wrote:Yeh it's just the amount of flesh colour will get flagged and the. They will look and see I go to the gh 1000 times a dayShezza wrote:The link is for photobucket .... not some dodgy pron site etc....Shadow Boxer wrote:It will get flagged in the security filters.
Re: Michael or other lawyers rip this a new one please
Posted: November 11, 2013, 5:41 pm
Sounds like BS to me.
Re: Michael or other lawyers rip this a new one please
Posted: November 11, 2013, 5:43 pm
I remember this thread. Those were simpler times.
Re: Michael or other lawyers rip this a new one please
Posted: November 11, 2013, 5:47 pm
Before we all had hats.
Re: Michael or other lawyers rip this a new one please
Posted: November 11, 2013, 5:53 pm
Yes. Before we all had hats.
Re: Michael or other lawyers rip this a new one please
Posted: November 11, 2013, 5:58 pm
Google email filtering on Wikipedia. Particularly the paragraph on customisation.The Nickman wrote:Sounds like BS to me.
In my last department they ran courses for the people that have to look at the thumbnails all day
Re: Michael or other lawyers rip this a new one please
Posted: November 11, 2013, 6:17 pm
Just spoke to him then about it, he hadnt decided yet or fully looked into it for him it was all about doing a friend a favor and he felt it an honor to be asked (they're compiling a list of potentials), unlike me he didn't want a kid. If theres no guarantee of a contract protecting him no way in hell he'll do it, unlike me who knew the contract wasnt a guarantee but was willing to take the risk due to her situation.Schifty wrote:What on earth is he getting out of this?Manbush wrote:Ok, how about finding out off a mate that my brother is considering doin something but 100 times riskier and I'm the one that's gotta try and warn him offShezza wrote:Tell us another story please Manbush....
While I considered mine to be low risk due to her being a wealthy well respected lady in her community who had already raised one quality kid as a solo mum without help and me not having much money to bleed anyway, he's seriously considering it with a pair of bogan, welfare dependent ex drug addict lesbians, one of whom already has two juvenile delinquent kids and has had the hots for him for years, while financially he's currently a lil bit better off than me he is looking at a multi million dollar workers comp lawsuit.
Do they have blackmail material on him?
Re: Michael or other lawyers rip this a new one please
Posted: November 11, 2013, 6:25 pm
So you were fine with NR's old avatar though??Shadow Boxer wrote:Google email filtering on Wikipedia. Particularly the paragraph on customisation.The Nickman wrote:Sounds like BS to me.
In my last department they ran courses for the people that have to look at the thumbnails all day
Re: Michael or other lawyers rip this a new one please
Posted: November 11, 2013, 6:28 pm
Some of the gym/fitness ads that appear have more flesh than Nickos av
Re: Michael or other lawyers rip this a new one please
Posted: November 11, 2013, 6:29 pm
Nick wrote:
that one is fine, carry onRe: Michael or other lawyers rip this a new one please
Posted: November 11, 2013, 7:58 pm
There'd be less flesh if Shez found one with shirts on and no pants..
Would that be better SB?
Would that be better SB?
Re: Michael or other lawyers rip this a new one please
Posted: November 12, 2013, 6:54 am
lol, no.
Sorry to be a pain guys but you'll just have to trust me on this one.
No-one wants to explain that photo to their boss. You'll also notice none of the public servants are arguing with me.
Sorry to be a pain guys but you'll just have to trust me on this one.
No-one wants to explain that photo to their boss. You'll also notice none of the public servants are arguing with me.
Re: Michael or other lawyers rip this a new one please
Posted: November 12, 2013, 7:03 am
Just use your phone SB
Re: Michael or other lawyers rip this a new one please
Posted: November 12, 2013, 7:06 am
Strangely enough Nick's Avatar is now even worse.
Re: Michael or other lawyers rip this a new one please
Posted: November 12, 2013, 7:08 am
Who is that Nickman is kissing?Raider Bell wrote:Strangely enough Nick's Avatar is now even worse.
Re: Michael or other lawyers rip this a new one please
Posted: November 12, 2013, 7:10 am
Looks like LuffyGreenbits wrote:Who is that Nickman is kissing?Raider Bell wrote:Strangely enough Nick's Avatar is now even worse.
Re: Michael or other lawyers rip this a new one please
Posted: November 12, 2013, 7:12 am
Luffty?
Edit, had the screen open while I checked who it looked like, Bushy beat me to it.
Edit, had the screen open while I checked who it looked like, Bushy beat me to it.
Re: Michael or other lawyers rip this a new one please
Posted: November 12, 2013, 7:13 am
That's Douglas.
For those who don't know, Nickman accidently liked a bloke called "Douglas" on tinder. It worked out for the best however.....
For those who don't know, Nickman accidently liked a bloke called "Douglas" on tinder. It worked out for the best however.....
Re: Michael or other lawyers rip this a new one please
Posted: November 12, 2013, 7:14 am
The skank! I thought that I was "The One"Manbush wrote:Looks like LuffyGreenbits wrote:Who is that Nickman is kissing?Raider Bell wrote:Strangely enough Nick's Avatar is now even worse.
Re: Michael or other lawyers rip this a new one please
Posted: March 24, 2014, 7:58 pm
This is a legit question, so here goes.
My sister is in debt up to her proverbial, she's asked for help from the family.
She has said she is paying off the family home, she has moved out of and left the ex partner and kids.
Her name is on the loan along with the ex's father, but her name is not on the deed to the house.
I feel she's been scammed.
question is she entitled to claim back the money she's paid towards the house?
Does she have any claim to the house or how does she get out of the loan?
I would like some feed back before I have to fork out for more dollars?
My sister is in debt up to her proverbial, she's asked for help from the family.
She has said she is paying off the family home, she has moved out of and left the ex partner and kids.
Her name is on the loan along with the ex's father, but her name is not on the deed to the house.
I feel she's been scammed.
question is she entitled to claim back the money she's paid towards the house?
Does she have any claim to the house or how does she get out of the loan?
I would like some feed back before I have to fork out for more dollars?
Re: Michael or other lawyers rip this a new one please
Posted: March 24, 2014, 9:43 pm
I do believe if has substantially contributed for a period then she is entitled to some form of remuneration for it. Of course, I am zero percent a lawyer and can't offer you anything concrete. Honestly, sometimes it pays to pay and by that I mean I would immediately see a local solicitor. Unless one of the resident lawyers is kind enough to give some goodwill.
Re: Michael or other lawyers rip this a new one please
Posted: March 24, 2014, 10:53 pm
Thanks for bumping my thread of shame
No idea on answering your question but as bell said if dont get a good answer seek a professionals guidance, there are a few free sites/forums also that could perhaps answer it (if moneys tight or just want a base idea to start with) here's a link to one.
http://www.aussielegal.com.au/forum/
No idea on answering your question but as bell said if dont get a good answer seek a professionals guidance, there are a few free sites/forums also that could perhaps answer it (if moneys tight or just want a base idea to start with) here's a link to one.
http://www.aussielegal.com.au/forum/
Re: Michael or other lawyers rip this a new one please
Posted: March 25, 2014, 7:49 am
Is this in the context of a divorce? If that's the case, the courts won't worry too much about who's name is on what document.dreaming09 wrote:This is a legit question, so here goes.
My sister is in debt up to her proverbial, she's asked for help from the family.
She has said she is paying off the family home, she has moved out of and left the ex partner and kids.
Her name is on the loan along with the ex's father, but her name is not on the deed to the house.
I feel she's been scammed.
question is she entitled to claim back the money she's paid towards the house?
Does she have any claim to the house or how does she get out of the loan?
I would like some feed back before I have to fork out for more dollars?
Re: Michael or other lawyers rip this a new one please
Posted: March 26, 2014, 9:11 pm
Hey, sorry Manbush for bumping your thread of shame, but didn't want to start a new tread.
The gathering was tonight, the issues are a lot clearer now, a tonne of weight lifted of her shoulders.
The house is in the ex's name not both names, but her name is also on the loan.
They had a "gentleman's agreement or hand shake agreement" to make the split 50/50 should the time come to do so.
The answer was a no brainer really, suggesting she see the bank and a solicitor to wind things up before it gets a lot messier.
Thanks guys for your thoughts, It's good to have a sounding board. I knew she had to see a solicitor.
but didn't want to start a new tread.The gathering was tonight, the issues are a lot clearer now, a tonne of weight lifted of her shoulders.
The house is in the ex's name not both names, but her name is also on the loan.
They had a "gentleman's agreement or hand shake agreement" to make the split 50/50 should the time come to do so.
The answer was a no brainer really, suggesting she see the bank and a solicitor to wind things up before it gets a lot messier.
Thanks guys for your thoughts, It's good to have a sounding board. I knew she had to see a solicitor.
Re: Michael or other lawyers rip this a new one please
Posted: March 28, 2014, 5:05 am
Thank you dreaming, without this bump I may never had read chapter 7 in the amusing adventures of manbush!
Re: Michael or other lawyers rip this a new one please
Posted: March 28, 2014, 12:58 pm
Direct her here. http://www.relationships.org.au/locatio ... nberra-frcdreaming09 wrote:This is a legit question, so here goes.
My sister is in debt up to her proverbial, she's asked for help from the family.
She has said she is paying off the family home, she has moved out of and left the ex partner and kids.
Her name is on the loan along with the ex's father, but her name is not on the deed to the house.
I feel she's been scammed.
question is she entitled to claim back the money she's paid towards the house?
Does she have any claim to the house or how does she get out of the loan?
I would like some feed back before I have to fork out for more dollars?
If she has money troubles this sounds like a better solution in the first instance than engaging a solicitor.
Re: Michael or other lawyers rip this a new one please
Posted: March 28, 2014, 2:49 pm
How it didn't win a boogs award is beyond me, no other thread has had such a huge plot twistpickles wrote:Thank you dreaming, without this bump I may never had read chapter 7 in the amusing adventures of manbush!