NRL Coverage could be split up under new TV deals

Talk about NRL, State of Origin, Tests, Four Nations, World Cup, everything rugby league

Moderator: GH Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
greeneyed
Don Furner
Posts: 145361
Joined: January 7, 2005, 4:21 pm

NRL Coverage could be split up under new TV deals

Post by greeneyed »

Interesting story in today's Sun Herald, regarding the next deals for NRL coverage on free to air and pay television. The pay TV deal with Foxtel runs out at the end of 2006 and the free to air deal at the end of 2007.

The NRL wants to bring the deals into line in the future, so they expire at the same time.

Nine has the option of matching the best rival offer for the free to air deal and keeping the NRL for another five years.

However, the article suggests that anything could happen, with competition expected to be intense - including a carve up between channels, as with the AFL deal. The NRL is said to be impressed with the amount of free to air coverage for AFL under the AFL deal. David Gallop said the NRL is interested in "striving for a balance between making our game available to a large number of viewers and maximising our revenue".

The present deals deliver $33m annually from Foxtel and only $12m annually from Nine. Industry analysts suggest that the free to air rights should deliver at least as much as the pay TV deal in the future.

I hope what ever happens, we get at least free to air coverage on Saturday nights, as well as Fridays and Sundays.
User avatar
Sasha
Laurie Daley
Posts: 15428
Joined: January 6, 2005, 9:27 pm
Favourite Player: Woodgers

Post by Sasha »

More free to air coverage can only be a good thing, the current deal is disgraceful, showing just 2/7 matches each week. :roll:
Image
Inactive

Post by Inactive »

But then I cant really justify paying $84/month for Fox :?
User avatar
SOULS 04
Jason Croker
Posts: 4320
Joined: January 25, 2005, 1:00 am
Location: Central Coast

Post by SOULS 04 »

yeh more free to air would be good

i got fox right now so im not too worried
THE GREEN MACHINE PODCAST - https://soundcloud.com/user-792269565
Boing Boing
Simon Woolford
Posts: 471
Joined: January 13, 2005, 9:27 am

Post by Boing Boing »

I want it taken away from channel nine. I hate channel nine. they think thyey own australian sport and can do what ever they want with it. It's a joke. That's why I have foxtel. No idiots like phil gould or fatty vautin.
Image
Catherine
John Ferguson
Posts: 2095
Joined: January 10, 2005, 9:00 am
Location: Canberra

Post by Catherine »

Free to air would be good if they had more live games!!
User avatar
Sasha
Laurie Daley
Posts: 15428
Joined: January 6, 2005, 9:27 pm
Favourite Player: Woodgers

Post by Sasha »

Catherine wrote:Free to air would be good if they had more live games!!
It would be better if they had ANY Live games during the regular season.
Last edited by Sasha on January 31, 2005, 4:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
Nick
Mal Meninga
Posts: 54995
Joined: January 6, 2005, 7:21 pm
Favourite Player: Jack Wighton

Post by Nick »

hmm ive got foxtel but more FTA would be nice
User avatar
jedski
Ricky Stuart
Posts: 9003
Joined: January 8, 2005, 9:35 pm
Favourite Player: The Veloci-Rapana

Post by jedski »

Bay56 wrote:But then I cant really justify paying $84/month for Fox :?
Free's much better than $84. :D 8)
Post Reply