The Greenhouse

gangrenous

Here. All onside.

gangrenous

Is it? Where’s the pic? I specifically went back to look and they were all onside? [emoji848]

gangrenous

Here I am, stuck in the middle with you

gangrenous

I think they’ve ditched it because it makes it unnecessarily complicated to monitor and check. Plus there’s the issue of if the kicker is tackled/bumped then you’ve added another judgment as to whether they were sufficiently impaired from going through to run players onside. So I think the new inter...

gangrenous

The Rickman wrote: Exactly. It’s always that way. And that’s what some of us around here have been trying to say for years but we keep getting shouted down by the fergrenous gang

When was the last time prior to this that the NRL felt they had erred significantly in favour of the Raiders and apologised?

gangrenous

Three critical decisions in the game that all went our way! I hadn't noticed the Whitehead one live but that was a clear penalty that was missed. Not sure I agree about the sin bin of Croker as the Storm player could have clearly made it a lot easier for him to get his hand out. Maybe the luck is r...

gangrenous

That’s a pretty old pic of ANZ. That seating at the ends didn’t last too long after the Olympics.

gangrenous

pickles wrote:While the Bunnies got schooled one the weekend it was only a week before that they beat the Chooks by bashing them out of the game.

That game meant nothing to the Roosters. They gave as many asterisks as Raiders against Warriors. I wouldn’t base anything on that result.

gangrenous

Good question, not sure if there’s a plan on that front.

Beyond take over all bays [emoji6]

gangrenous

PigRickman wrote: Manly needed a 100 metre offside intercept to beat us

He wasn’t quite that far offside [emoji6]

Completely agree on the stuff about if we lose it’s because a good football team beat us.

gangrenous

Grand final tickets are already on sale to the public now. You can buy up to 8 at a time.

gangrenous

PigRickman wrote: I've personally experienced a more imporbable championship run from a team of mine than the one facing the Raiders today.

I remember that plucky bunch!

Quack, quack, quack, quack!

gangrenous

gangrenous

Come on, make them a bit more of a dilemma! [emoji16]

gangrenous

They’re next to the posts gonna be 58-0!

gangrenous

They’re gonna try and equal our 56-0 record here!

gangrenous

Pretty solid gap in ability between the top 6 and 7th down isn’t there

gangrenous

Ooh can we have 50+ please?

gangrenous

Looks like we’re not the only team with a clean sheet result now.

gangrenous

That didn’t work so well in 2017

gangrenous

Was chatting about that with the family. I think if Croker is striking at 100% you still have your backup kicker doing that practice.

You can’t risk Croker going down in a final and expecting your backup kicker to step in unpracticed.

But yes it’s probably more important in this case.

gangrenous

Please explain how I’m all over the place. Feel free to keep doubling down on Bull by all means. You don’t seem to have anything else. Thanks for putting rubbish in the Game Day thread of one of the greatest games in Raiders history by the way. I think I’d best Shadowbox out of here since I’m becomi...

gangrenous

I’ve already made it clear that in my view it’s a bad decision in favour of the Raiders.

gangrenous

That was exactly the point I was trying to make Gangers. I didn't have a problem with taking the shot for goal which potentially got us out to an 8 point lead and success or failure means we get the ball back. I just thought from a game management point of view, throwing the ball to the co-skipper ...

gangrenous

LastRaider wrote:God your bias to Croker GE, I see you even have him rated as a better player then Bateman and Hodgson this year as our 5th best

Think you’ll find you’re looking at the total points, which is impacted by number of games played.

GE has both above Croker on a points per game basis.

gangrenous

I think Croker is very good in pressure situations. He’s iced a lot of critical difficult kicks. But certainly he’s out of form, he knows it, and that seems to make it worse. I guarantee he is leaving no stone unturned to try and address it. It’s the type of guy he is. I think there’s definitely an ...

gangrenous

At the start of the season Nickman decided to go all in on the poso stuff, not because he believed it, but in a more sarcastic fashion. If he had been serious there wouldn’t have been the 7 week deadline for his new schtick ending. Lo and behold the team delivered, and he claims it like he’s a geniu...

gangrenous

You may also recall this being called in last time we met the Storm:

gangrenous

- we had a clearly defined gangrenous “howler” go our way in the closing stages of the game to deny the storm any chance of a comeback and possibly the worst error I’ve ever seen a touchie make. Probably unconscious bias because we’re one of the glamour clubs, I s’pose Yep, you finally found a howl...

gangrenous

-TW- wrote:
Dr Zaius wrote:How many tickets can one person buy?
8 or 10

Can't remember if it gets reduced for the prelims

Sent from my CPH1831 using Tapatalk

If I remember correctly it drops to 4 for the Prelim

gangrenous

Ultima wrote:Looking at a replay of that last kick off from the Storm, they had a player offside directly in front of the ref (to the left of Smith), where was our penalty?

I saw that claimed last night and had a look. All looked fine to me.

gangrenous

Roger Kenworthy wrote:
gangrenous wrote: ↑
September 14, 2019, 10:47 pm
Can’t fight logic like that
Are you trying to tell me that our victory over Souths in Round 19 1998 holds no relevance to our chances of beating them in a Prelim Final?

I wasn’t. But I’m happy to do that also.

gangrenous

Ruben Daley wrote:
Elcaptcroker wrote: ↑
September 14, 2019, 9:37 pm
The second best thing ive watched tonight was bellamys press conferencd

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
He was absolutely seething, wasn’t he?

Whoever it was who strayed outside his system is going to be solidly reamed on Monday.

If you think it’s you I just wouldn’t show up!

gangrenous

Can’t fight logic like that

gangrenous

I think Souths are the toughest out of that lot, so I want them. Then I want the Roosters in the final and I hope they play just as well as they did on Friday night. Leave zero questions that we are the best team in this **** competition That’s not possible. There’s just no way that people watching...

Search found 9756 matches

Re: 2019 Finals Week 1 V Storm: Game Day

Re: 2019 Finals Week 1 V Storm: Game Day

Re: Canterbury Bulldogs want to sign Canberra Raiders centre Joey Leilua

Re: 2019 Finals Week 1 V Storm: Game Day

Re: 2019 Finals Week 1 V Storm: Game Day

Re: 2019 Finals Week 1 V Storm: Game Day

Re: NEEDMEMBERSCODE - Grand Final tickets

Re: Who would you prefer to play in the Preliminary Final?

Re: Grand final tickets

Re: 2019 Preliminary Final: Teams and Previews

Grand final tickets

Re: Who would you prefer to play in the Preliminary Final?

Re: 2019 NRL Finals Week 1 - Teams and Game Day

Re: 2019 NRL Finals Week 1 - Teams and Game Day

Re: 2019 NRL Finals Week 1 - Teams and Game Day

Re: 2019 NRL Finals Week 1 - Teams and Game Day

Re: 2019 NRL Finals Week 1 - Teams and Game Day

Re: 2019 NRL Finals Week 1 - Teams and Game Day

2019 NRL Finals Week 1 - Teams and Game Day

Re: Canterbury Bulldogs want to sign Canberra Raiders centre Joey Leilua

Re: Croker's kicking

2019 Finals Week 1 V Storm: Game Day

Re: 2019 Finals Week 1 V Storm: Game Day

Re: Croker's kicking

Re: Through green eyes 2019

Re: Croker's kicking

Re: 2019 Finals Week 1 V Storm: Game Day

Re: 2019 Finals Week 1 V Storm: Game Day

Re: 2019 Finals Week 1 V Storm: Game Day

Re: Preliminary Final Tickets

Re: 2019 Finals Week 1 V Storm: Game Day

Re: Who would you prefer to play in the Preliminary Final?

Re: 2019 Finals Week 1 V Storm: Game Day

Re: Who would you prefer to play in the Preliminary Final?

Re: Who would you prefer to play in the prelim?